Social Pressure in the International Human Rights Regime: Why States Withdraw Treaty Reservations

被引:4
|
作者
Boyes, Christina [1 ]
Eldredge, Cody D. [2 ]
Shannon, Megan [3 ]
Zvobgo, Kelebogile [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Invest & Docencia Econ AC, Div Estudios Int, Mexico City 01210, Mexico
[2] Oakland Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Rochester, MI 48309 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Polit Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[4] William & Mary, Govt Dept, Williamsburg, VA 23185 USA
[5] William & Mary, Global Res Inst, Williamsburg, VA 23185 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
treaty reservations; objections; withdrawal; human rights treaties; international law; SELECTION BIAS; COURT;
D O I
10.1017/S0007123423000339
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
States often use reservations to modify their treaty obligations. Prior research demonstrates why states enter reservations and why states object to reservations, but little work explains why states withdraw them. We argue that states withdraw reservations in response to international social pressure. Using novel data on reservations and reservation withdrawals for the nine core international human rights treaties, our analyses reveal two factors that compel states to withdraw reservations: (1) pressure from peer states and (2) pressure from human rights treaty bodies conducting periodic reviews. While previous work emphasizes domestic factors, our research shows that the international community encourages states to withdraw reservations and strengthen their commitments to human rights and international law.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 259
页数:19
相关论文
共 13 条