Promoting equity, inclusion, and efficiency: A team science approach to the development of authorship guidelines for a multi-disciplinary research team

被引:1
作者
Lewis, Hannah [1 ]
Biesecker, Barbara [2 ]
Lee, Sandra Soo-Jin [3 ]
Anderson, Katherine [4 ]
Joseph, Galen [5 ]
Jenkins, Charisma L. [6 ]
Bulkley, Joanna E. [6 ]
Leo, Michael C. [6 ]
Goddard, Katrina A. B. [6 ,7 ]
Wilfond, Benjamin S. [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Seattle Childrens Res Inst, Treuman Katz Ctr Pediat Bioeth, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[2] RTI Int, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Med Humanities & Ethics, New York, NY USA
[4] Denver Hlth Med Ctr, Denver, CO USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Humanities & Social Sci, San Francisco, CA USA
[6] Kaiser Permanente Ctr Hlth Res, Dept Translat & Appl Genom, Portland, OR USA
[7] NCI, Div Canc Control & Populat Sci, NIH, Rockville, MD USA
[8] Univ Washington, Dept Pediat, Div Bioeth & Palliat Care, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Team science; authorship; multidisciplinary research; equity; CO-AUTHORSHIP; COLLABORATION;
D O I
10.1017/cts.2023.685
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Large research teams and consortia present challenges for authorship. The number of disciplines involved in the research can further complicate approaches to manuscript development and leadership. The CHARM team, representing a multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional genomics implementation study, participated in facilitated discussions inspired by team science methodologies. The discussions were centered on team members' past experiences with authorship and perspectives on authorship in a large research team context. Team members identified challenges and opportunities that were used to create guidelines and administrative tools to support manuscript development. The guidelines were organized by the three values of equity, inclusion, and efficiency and included eight principles. A visual dashboard was created to allow all team members to see who was leading or involved in each paper. Additional tools to promote equity, inclusion, and efficiency included providing standardized project management for each manuscript and making "concept sheets" for each manuscript accessible to all team members. The process used in CHARM can be used by other large research teams and consortia to equitably distribute lead authorship opportunities, foster coauthor inclusion, and efficiently work with large authorship groups.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium: Integrating Genomic Sequencing in Diverse and Medically Underserved Populations
    Amendola, Laura M.
    Berg, Jonathan S.
    Horowitz, Carol R.
    Angelo, Frank
    Bensen, Jeannette T.
    Biesecker, Barbara B.
    Biesecker, Leslie G.
    Cooper, Gregory M.
    East, Kelly
    Filipski, Kelly
    Fullerton, Stephanie M.
    Gelb, Bruce D.
    Goddard, Katrina A. B.
    Hailu, Benyam
    Hart, Ragan
    Hassmiller-Lich, Kristen
    Joseph, Galen
    Kenny, Eimear E.
    Koenig, Barbara A.
    Knight, Sara
    Kwok, Pui-Yan
    Lewis, Katie L.
    McGuire, Amy L.
    Norton, Mary E.
    Ou, Jeffrey
    Parsons, Donald W.
    Powell, Bradford C.
    Risch, Neil
    Robinson, Mimsie
    Rini, Christine
    Scollon, Sarah
    Slavotinek, Anne M.
    Veenstra, David L.
    Wasserstein, Melissa P.
    Wilfond, Benjamin S.
    Hindorff, Lucia A.
    Plon, Sharon E.
    Jarvik, Gail P.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2018, 103 (03) : 319 - 327
  • [2] What does it mean to be an author? The intersection of credit, contribution, and collaboration in science
    Birnholtz, Jeremy P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 57 (13): : 1758 - 1770
  • [3] Trouble in Paradise: Problems in Academic Research Co-authoring
    Bozeman, Barry
    Youtie, Jan
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2016, 22 (06) : 1717 - 1743
  • [4] Managing Opportunities and Challenges of Co-Authorship
    Conn, Vicki S.
    Ward, Sandra
    Herrick, Linda
    Topp, Robert
    Alexander, Gregory L.
    Anderson, Cindy M.
    Smith, Carol E.
    Benefield, Lazelle E.
    Given, Barbara
    Titler, Marita
    Larson, Janet L.
    Fahrenwald, Nancy L.
    Cohen, Marlene Z.
    Georgesen, Sharlene
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2015, 37 (02) : 134 - 163
  • [5] Writers Blocked: On the Wrongs of Research Co-authorship and Some Possible Strategies for Improvement
    Cutas, Daniela
    Shaw, David
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2015, 21 (05) : 1315 - 1329
  • [6] Editors ICoMJ, 2023, Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals
  • [7] Measuring dissatisfaction with coauthorship: An empirical approach based on the researchers' perception
    Gomez-Ferri, Javier
    Gonzalez-Alcaide, Gregorio
    LLopis-Goig, Ramon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2019, 13 (04)
  • [8] Say my name, say my name: Academic authorship conventions between editorial policies and disciplinary practices
    Hesselmann, Felicitas
    Schendzielorz, Cornelia
    Sorgatz, Nikita
    [J]. RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2021, 30 (03) : 382 - 392
  • [9] Koepsell D., 2017, Scientific Integrity and Research Ethics: An Approach from the Ethos of Science, P25
  • [10] Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM): A clinical trial assessing a multimodal cancer genetics services delivery program and its impact on diverse populations
    Mittendorf, Kathleen F.
    Kauffman, Tia L.
    Amendola, Laura M.
    Anderson, Katherine P.
    Biesecker, Barbara B.
    Dorschner, Michael O.
    Duenas, Devan M.
    Eubanks, Donna J.
    Feigelson, Heather Spencer
    Gilmore, Marian J.
    Hunter, Jessica Ezzell
    Joseph, Galen
    Kraft, Stephanie A.
    Lee, Sandra Soo Jin
    Leo, Michael C.
    Liles, Elizabeth G.
    Lindberg, Nangel M.
    Muessig, Kristin R.
    Okuyama, Sonia
    Porter, Kathryn M.
    Riddle, Leslie S.
    Rolf, Bradley A.
    Rope, Alan F.
    Zepp, Jamilyn M.
    Jarvik, Gail P.
    Wilfond, Benjamin S.
    Goddard, Katrina A. B.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 106