The Effects of Exoskeleton Assistance at the Ankle on Sensory Integration During Standing Balance

被引:0
|
作者
Canete, Santiago [1 ]
Wilson, Elizabeth B. [2 ]
Wright, W. Geoffrey [3 ,4 ]
Jacobs, Daniel A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Temple Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Mech Engn, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[2] Temple Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Bioengn, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[3] Temple Univ, Dept Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Temple Univ, Dept Bioengn, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[5] Temple Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Assistive devices; ankle exoskeleton; sensory information; postural control; quiet standing; POSTURAL CONTROL; ORGANIZATION TEST; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; POSTUROGRAPHY; EQUILIBRIUM; ORIENTATION; SUPPORT; WALKING; MUSCLE; INJURY;
D O I
10.1109/TNSRE.2023.3330846
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Exoskeleton devices can reduce metabolic cost, increase walking speed, and augment load-carrying capacity. However, little is known about the effects of powered assistance on the sensory information required to achieve these tasks. To learn how to use an assistive device, humans must integrate novel sensory information into their internal model. This process may be disrupted by challenges to the sensory systems used for posture. We investigated the exoskeleton-induced changes to balance performance and sensory integration during quiet standing. We asked 11 unimpaired adults to perform a virtual reality-based test of sensory integration in balance (VRSIB) on two days while wearing the exoskeleton either unpowered, using proportional myoelectric control, or with regular shoes. We measured postural biomechanics, muscle activity, equilibrium scores, postural control strategy, and sensory ratios. Results showed improvement in balance performance when wearing the exoskeleton on firm ground. The opposite occurred when standing on an unstable platform with eyes closed or when the visual information was non-veridical. The balance performance was equivalent when the exoskeleton was powered versus unpowered in all conditions except when both the support surface and the visual information were altered. We argue that in stable ground conditions, the passive stiffness of the device dominates the postural task. In contrast, when the ground becomes unstable the passive stiffness negatively affects balance performance. Furthermore, when the visual input to the user is non-veridical, exoskeleton assistance can magnify erroneous muscle inputs and negatively impact the user's postural control.
引用
收藏
页码:4428 / 4438
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Virtual Neuromuscular Control for Robotic Ankle Exoskeleton Standing Balance
    Yin, Kaiyang
    Jin, Yantao
    Du, Haojie
    Xue, Yaxu
    Li, Pengfei
    Ma, Zhengsen
    MACHINES, 2022, 10 (07)
  • [2] Experimental characterization of the T-FLEX ankle exoskeleton for gait assistance*
    Gomez-Vargas, Daniel
    Ballen-Moreno, Felipe
    Rodriguez-Guerrero, Carlos
    Munera, Marcela
    Cifuentes, Carlos A.
    MECHATRONICS, 2021, 78
  • [3] Sensory integration training improves balance in older individuals
    Thompson, Lara A.
    Savadkoohi, Marzieh
    de Paiva, Gabriel Velluto
    Brusamolin, Joao Augusto Renno
    Guise, Jelani
    Suh, Pius
    Guerrero, Pablo Sanchez
    42ND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY: ENABLING INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR GLOBAL HEALTHCARE EMBC'20, 2020, : 3811 - 3814
  • [4] Sensory integration of a light touch reference in human standing balance
    Asslaender, Lorenz
    Smith, Craig P.
    Reynolds, Raymond F.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (06):
  • [5] Effects of ankle exoskeleton assistance during human walking on lower limb muscle contractions and coordination patterns
    Wang W.
    Ding J.
    Wang Y.
    Liu Y.
    Zhang J.
    Liu J.
    Shengwu Yixue Gongchengxue Zazhi/Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2022, 39 (01): : 75 - 83
  • [6] Quantification and Modeling of Ankle Stiffness During Standing Balance
    Nalam, Varun
    Adjei, Ermyntrude
    Lee, Hyunglae
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 68 (06) : 1828 - 1837
  • [7] The energy cost for balance control during upright standing
    Houdijk, Han
    Fickert, Richard
    van Velzen, Judith
    van Bennekom, Coen
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2009, 30 (02) : 150 - 154
  • [8] Effects of Concurrent and Terminal Visual Feedback on Ankle Co-Contraction in Older Adults during Standing Balance
    Vitali, Rachel V.
    Barone, Vincent J.
    Ferris, Jamie
    Stirling, Leia A.
    Sienko, Kathleen H.
    SENSORS, 2021, 21 (21)
  • [9] Changes in sensory reweighting of proprioceptive information during standing balance with age and disease
    Pasma, J. H.
    Engelhart, D.
    Maier, A. B.
    Schouten, A. C.
    van der Kooij, H.
    Meskers, C. G. M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 114 (06) : 3220 - 3233
  • [10] Design and Evaluation of an Active Ankle Exoskeleton in Gait Assistance
    Dong, Wenchao
    Liu, Chongchong
    Zhang, Qin
    Xiong, Caihua
    2019 IEEE/ASME INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INTELLIGENT MECHATRONICS (AIM), 2019, : 318 - 322