Differentiating Radiation Necrosis and Metastatic Progression in Brain Tumors Using Radiomics and Machine Learning

被引:8
作者
Salari, Elahheh [1 ]
Elsamaloty, Haitham [2 ]
Ray, Aniruddha [3 ,4 ]
Hadziahmetovic, Mersiha [1 ]
Parsai, E. Ishmael [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toledo, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toledo, OH USA
[2] Univ Toledo Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Sylvania, SK, Canada
[3] Univ Toledo, Adjunct Fac, Dept Phys & Astron, Toledo, OH USA
[4] Univ Toledo, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toledo, OH USA
[5] Univ Toledo Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 8874 Linden Lake Rd, Sylvania, OH 43560 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS | 2023年 / 46卷 / 11期
关键词
brain metastasis progression; machine learning; radiation necrosis; radiomics; STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY; RADIONECROSIS; FEATURES; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1097/COC.0000000000001036
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: Distinguishing between radiation necrosis (RN) and metastatic progression is extremely challenging due to their similarity in conventional imaging. This is crucial from a therapeutic point of view as this determines the outcome of the treatment. This study aims to establish an automated technique to differentiate RN from brain metastasis progression using radiomics with machine learning.Methods: Eighty-six patients with brain metastasis after they underwent stereotactic radiosurgery as primary treatment were selected. Discrete wavelets transform, Laplacian-of-Gaussian, Gradient, and Square were applied to magnetic resonance post-contrast T1-weighted images to extract radiomics features. After feature selection, dataset was randomly split into train/test (80%/20%) datasets. Random forest classification, logistic regression, and support vector classification were trained and subsequently validated using test set. The classification performance was measured by area under the curve (AUC) value of receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.Results: The best performance was achieved using random forest classification with a Gradient filter (AUC=0.910 +/- 0.047, accuracy 0.8 +/- 0.071, sensitivity=0.796 +/- 0.055, specificity=0.922 +/- 0.059). For, support vector classification the best result obtains using wavelet_HHH with a high AUC of 0.890 +/- 0.89, accuracy of 0.777 +/- 0.062, sensitivity=0.701 +/- 0.084, and specificity=0.85 +/- 0.112. Logistic regression using wavelet_HHH provides a poor result with AUC=0.882 +/- 0.051, accuracy of 0.753 +/- 0.08, sensitivity=0.717 +/- 0.208, and specificity=0.816 +/- 0.123.Conclusion: This type of machine-learning approach can help accurately distinguish RN from recurrence in magnetic resonance imaging, without the need for biopsy. This has the potential to improve the therapeutic outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 495
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Andres L., 2016, Chapter 5: Assessment of Cellular and Organ Function and Dysfunction using Direct and Derived MRI Methodologies
[2]   Differentiation between glioblastoma, brain metastasis and subtypes using radiomics analysis [J].
Artzi, Moran ;
Bressler, Idan ;
Ben Bashat, Dafna .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 50 (02) :519-528
[3]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[4]  
Chernov Mikhail F, 2013, Acta Neurochir Suppl, V116, P193, DOI 10.1007/978-3-7091-1376-9_29
[5]  
Cinarer G., 2020, Appl Sci, V10, P1
[6]   SUPPORT-VECTOR NETWORKS [J].
CORTES, C ;
VAPNIK, V .
MACHINE LEARNING, 1995, 20 (03) :273-297
[7]   The effect of preprocessing filters on predictive performance in radiomics [J].
Demircioglu, Aydin .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL, 2022, 6 (01)
[8]  
Fink Kathleen R, 2013, Surg Neurol Int, V4, pS209, DOI 10.4103/2152-7806.111298
[9]   Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data [J].
Gillies, Robert J. ;
Kinahan, Paul E. ;
Hricak, Hedvig .
RADIOLOGY, 2016, 278 (02) :563-577
[10]   Differentiation between intra-axial metastatic tumor progression and radiation injury following fractionated radiation therapy or stereotactic radiosurgery using MR spectroscopy, perfusion MR imaging or volume progression modeling [J].
Huang, Jiayi ;
Wang, Ay-Ming ;
Shetty, Anil ;
Maitz, Ann H. ;
Yan, Di ;
Doyle, Danielle ;
Richey, Kenneth ;
Park, Sean ;
Pieper, Daniel R. ;
Chen, Peter Y. ;
Grills, Inga Siiner .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 29 (07) :993-1001