A prototype variable corresponding to the proportion of ischemia for the comparison between robotic and open partial nephrectomy: a meta-analysis accompanied by sensitivity analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Artsitas, Sotirios [1 ,2 ]
Artsitas, Dimitrios [3 ]
Koronaki, Irene [4 ]
Toutouzas, Konstantinos G. [1 ,2 ]
Zografos, George C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Geniko Nosokomeio Athenon Ippokrateio, Propaedeut Dept Surg 1, Vasilisis Sofias Str 114, Athens 11527, Greece
[2] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens NKUA, Sch Med, 75 Mikras Asias Str, Athens 11527, Greece
[3] KAT Hosp, Dept Orthopaed 2, Nikis Str 2, Athens 14561, Greece
[4] Natl Tech Univ Athens NTUA, Sch Mech Engn, Lab Appl Thermodynam, Zografou Campus,Heroon Polytech Str 9, Athens 15780, Greece
关键词
Robotic partial nephrectomy; Open partial nephrectomy; Surgical precision; Ischemia; Operative time; Meta-analysis; ASSISTED PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; TRIFECTA OUTCOMES; SINGLE-SURGEON; TUMORS; EXPERIENCE; ACHIEVE; MARGIN; IRON;
D O I
10.1186/s43088-023-00431-3
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe primary objective of this study involves the formulation of a novel variable, derived from initial data related to ischemia duration and operative time in partial nephrectomies. The aim was to determine the proportion of ischemia for the comparison between robotic and open approaches in terms of their relative ischemic requirements.Main bodyThe literature search was conducted from August 2022 to June 2023, primarily encompassing non-randomized comparative studies in the English language. Ultimately, a total of 62 studies involving data from 26,072 patients were included. Following appropriate transformation of the original data under the assumption of normal distribution, the proportion of ischemia (I) was formulated for each study and comparison arm, using estimator functions. Subsequent analysis of the generated data was performed for both the original variables and the I outcome. Statistical significance was only observed regarding the surgical duration, with a mean difference of 19.74 min (CI95% = [11.56; 27.92]) in favor of robotic access. The mean difference in I was estimated on the entire dataset as well as carefully selected subgroups based on publication year, patient matching, the number of referral centers, and risk of bias class. Additionally, meta-regression analysis and four-level sensitivity analysis were conducted. In none of these investigations did statistically significant differences emerge between the two surgical approaches. These findings lead us to hypothesize that the proportion of ischemia in partial nephrectomies may represent an inherent characteristic of the procedure, typically manifesting as baseline ischemia (12-13% of operative time), with fluctuations depending on the chosen strategy or the complexity of the specific intervention.Short conclusionThere is no difference in the proportion of ischemia between robotic and open partial nephrectomies. In overall, ischemia time appears to be primarily determined by the overall duration of the procedure and the effectiveness in achieving adequate hemostasis.
引用
收藏
页数:39
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Fan
    Hu, Jiang-sheng
    Zhang, Kai-yu
    Liu, Xiao-hua
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 13
  • [32] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies Reporting Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy
    Xia, Leilei
    Wang, Xianjin
    Xu, Tianyuan
    Guzzo, Thomas J.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 (09) : 893 - 909
  • [33] Trifecta Outcomes in Multifocal Tumors: A Comparison Between Robotic and Open Partial Nephrectomy
    Yerram, Nitin K.
    Dagenais, Julien
    Bryk, Darren J.
    Nandanan, Naveen
    Maurice, Matthew J.
    Mouracade, Pascal
    Kara, Onder
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2018, 32 (07) : 615 - 620
  • [34] Comparison of perioperative outcomes with or without renorrhaphy during open partial nephrectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis
    Tachibana, Hidekazu
    Takagi, Toshio
    Kondo, Tsunenori
    Ishida, Hideki
    Tanabe, Kazunari
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2018, 44 (03): : 467 - 474
  • [35] Comparison of Radical Nephrectomy and Partial Nephrectomy for T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Chao
    Liao, Zhaolin
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2018, 101 (02) : 175 - 183
  • [36] Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Aboumarzouk, Omar M.
    Stein, Robert J.
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Chlosta, Piotr L.
    Somani, Bhaskar K.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (09) : 1244 - 1250
  • [37] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transaxillary Robotic Thyroidectomy Versus Open Thyroidectomy
    Shen, Hongliang
    Shan, Chengxiang
    Qiu, Ming
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2014, 24 (03) : 199 - 206
  • [38] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparison of Outcomes of Robot-Assisted versus Open Partial Nephrectomy in Clinical T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients
    Ni, Yixiu
    Yang, Xiaohua
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2022, 106 (08) : 757 - 767
  • [39] Trifecta Outcomes in Renal Hilar Tumors: A Comparison Between Robotic and Open Partial Nephrectomy
    Sagalovich, Daniel
    Dagenais, Julien
    Bertolo, Riccardo
    Garisto, Juan D.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2018, 32 (09) : 831 - 836
  • [40] Preoperative embolization of renal cell carcinoma prior to partial nephrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shanmugasundaram, Srinidhi
    Cieslak, John A.
    Sare, Antony
    Chandra, Vishnu
    Shukla, Pratik A.
    Kumar, Abhishek
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 76 : 205 - 212