A prototype variable corresponding to the proportion of ischemia for the comparison between robotic and open partial nephrectomy: a meta-analysis accompanied by sensitivity analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Artsitas, Sotirios [1 ,2 ]
Artsitas, Dimitrios [3 ]
Koronaki, Irene [4 ]
Toutouzas, Konstantinos G. [1 ,2 ]
Zografos, George C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Geniko Nosokomeio Athenon Ippokrateio, Propaedeut Dept Surg 1, Vasilisis Sofias Str 114, Athens 11527, Greece
[2] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens NKUA, Sch Med, 75 Mikras Asias Str, Athens 11527, Greece
[3] KAT Hosp, Dept Orthopaed 2, Nikis Str 2, Athens 14561, Greece
[4] Natl Tech Univ Athens NTUA, Sch Mech Engn, Lab Appl Thermodynam, Zografou Campus,Heroon Polytech Str 9, Athens 15780, Greece
关键词
Robotic partial nephrectomy; Open partial nephrectomy; Surgical precision; Ischemia; Operative time; Meta-analysis; ASSISTED PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; TRIFECTA OUTCOMES; SINGLE-SURGEON; TUMORS; EXPERIENCE; ACHIEVE; MARGIN; IRON;
D O I
10.1186/s43088-023-00431-3
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe primary objective of this study involves the formulation of a novel variable, derived from initial data related to ischemia duration and operative time in partial nephrectomies. The aim was to determine the proportion of ischemia for the comparison between robotic and open approaches in terms of their relative ischemic requirements.Main bodyThe literature search was conducted from August 2022 to June 2023, primarily encompassing non-randomized comparative studies in the English language. Ultimately, a total of 62 studies involving data from 26,072 patients were included. Following appropriate transformation of the original data under the assumption of normal distribution, the proportion of ischemia (I) was formulated for each study and comparison arm, using estimator functions. Subsequent analysis of the generated data was performed for both the original variables and the I outcome. Statistical significance was only observed regarding the surgical duration, with a mean difference of 19.74 min (CI95% = [11.56; 27.92]) in favor of robotic access. The mean difference in I was estimated on the entire dataset as well as carefully selected subgroups based on publication year, patient matching, the number of referral centers, and risk of bias class. Additionally, meta-regression analysis and four-level sensitivity analysis were conducted. In none of these investigations did statistically significant differences emerge between the two surgical approaches. These findings lead us to hypothesize that the proportion of ischemia in partial nephrectomies may represent an inherent characteristic of the procedure, typically manifesting as baseline ischemia (12-13% of operative time), with fluctuations depending on the chosen strategy or the complexity of the specific intervention.Short conclusionThere is no difference in the proportion of ischemia between robotic and open partial nephrectomies. In overall, ischemia time appears to be primarily determined by the overall duration of the procedure and the effectiveness in achieving adequate hemostasis.
引用
收藏
页数:39
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laparoscopic Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes
    You, Chengyu
    Du, Yuelin
    Wang, Hui
    Peng, Lei
    Wei, Tangqiang
    Zhang, Xiaojun
    Li, Xianhui
    Wang, Anguo
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [22] Impact of Surgical Factors on Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Outcomes: Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
    Medina, Luis G.
    Gill, Tania
    Abreu, Andre
    Sotelo, Rene
    Artibani, Walter
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (02) : 258 - 274
  • [23] Impact of Host Factors on Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Outcomes: Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
    Gill, Tania
    Medina, Luis
    Ashrafi, Akbar
    Winter, Matthew
    Sotelo, Rene
    Artibani, Walter
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (04) : 716 - 730
  • [24] Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Recurrence and Overall Survival Following Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Omrani, Mohmmad Amin
    Basiri, Abbas
    Rahimlou, Mehran
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2024, 22 (01) : 14 - 24
  • [25] Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Large (>4 Cm) Kidney Tumors: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Pavan, Nicola
    Derweesh, Ithaar H.
    Maria Mir, Carme
    Novara, Giacomo
    Hampton, Lance J.
    Ferro, Matteo
    Perdona, Sisto
    Parekh, Dipen J.
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Autorino, Riccardo
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (08) : 2420 - 2428
  • [26] Trifecta achievement in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive factors
    Bai, Nigemutu
    Qi, Muge
    Shan, Dan
    Liu, Suo
    Na, Ta
    Chen, Liang
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2022, 48 (04): : 625 - 636
  • [27] Impact of Renal Hilar Control on Outcomes of Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Systematic Review and Cumulative Meta-analysis
    Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
    Medina, Luis G.
    Gill, Tania S.
    Mendelsohn, Alec
    Husain, Fatima
    Bhardwaj, Lokesh
    Artibani, Walter
    Sotelo, Rene
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2019, 5 (04): : 619 - 635
  • [28] A meta-analysis between robotic hepatectomy and conventional open hepatectomy
    He, Zhi-Qiang
    Mao, Ya-Ling
    Lv, Tian-Run
    Liu, Fei
    Li, Fu-Yu
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [29] Comparison of Off-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy and On-Clamp Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Trehan, Abhishek
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2014, 93 (02) : 125 - 134
  • [30] Comparison of Sutureless Versus Suture Partial Nephrectomy for Clinical T1 Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of Retrospective Studies
    Zhang, Wenjun
    Che, Bangwei
    Xu, Shenghan
    Mu, Yi
    He, Jun
    Tang, Kaifa
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11