Recoupling livestock and feed production in the Netherlands to reduce environmental impacts

被引:18
|
作者
van Selm, Benjamin [1 ,2 ]
Hijbeek, Renske [2 ]
van Ittersum, Martin K.
van Hal, Ollie [1 ]
van Middelaar, Corina E. [1 ]
de Boer, Imke J. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Anim Prod Syst Grp, POB 338, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, Plant Prod Syst Grp, POB 430, NL-6700 AK Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Feed production; Greenhouse gas emissions; Nitrogen emissions; Circular food systems; FOODSOM; SYSTEM; FLOWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165540
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In many places on earth, livestock and feed production are decoupled, as feed is grown in one region and fed to livestock in another. This disrupts nutrient cycles by depleting resources in feed producing regions and accumulating resources in livestock areas, which leads to environmental degradation. One solution is to recouple livestock and feed production at a more local level, which enhances nutrient circularity. Recoupling livestock and feed production creates a natural ceiling for livestock numbers based on the feed producing capacity of a region. In this study we assess the consequences of recoupling livestock and feed production (i.e., by avoiding the import and export of animal feed) on ammonia and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with and without feed-food competition. To this end, we used FOODSOM, an agro-ecological food system optimisation model representing the Dutch food system in this study. The Netherlands is one example of a region with high livestock densities and resource accumulation. We found that recoupling decreased livestock numbers (beef cattle: -100 %; dairy cattle: -29 %; broiler chickens: -57 %; laying hens: -67 %; pigs: -62 %; sheep -100 %) and animal-sourced food exports (-59 %) while still meeting the current human diet in the Netherlands. Consequently, ammonia emissions and GHG emissions decreased, and the nitrogen use efficiency increased from 31 % to 38 % at the food systems level. Recoupling alone was almost sufficient to meet national emission targets. Fully meeting these targets required further small changes in livestock numbers. Avoiding feed-food competition decreased livestock productivity and GHG emissions but did not improve nitrogen use efficiency. Total meat production could not meet domestic consumption levels while avoiding feed-food competition, and resulted in additional beef cattle. We show that recoupling livestock and feed production is a promising next step to enhance circularity while decreasing agricultures environmental impact.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Environmental performance of feed production for broiler in Piaui state, Brazil
    Pacheco, Jossivaldo de Carvalho
    Moita Neto, Jose Machado
    da Silva, Elaine Aparecida
    ENGENHARIA SANITARIA E AMBIENTAL, 2018, 23 (04) : 707 - 716
  • [22] Life cycle environmental impacts of saffron production in Iran
    Khanali, Majid
    Farahani, Saeid Shahvarooghi
    Shojaei, Hamidreza
    Elhami, Behzad
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2017, 24 (05) : 4812 - 4821
  • [23] Agricultural Biogas Production-Climate and Environmental Impacts
    Moller, Henrik B.
    Sorensen, Peter
    Olesen, Jorgen E.
    Petersen, Soren O.
    Nyord, Tavs
    Sommer, Sven G.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [24] Mitigation options to reduce nitrogen losses to water from crop and livestock production in China
    Lu, Jie
    Bai, Zhaohai
    Chadwick, Dave
    Velthof, Gerard L.
    Zhao, Hao
    Li, Xiaoxin
    Hu, Chunsheng
    Ma, Lin
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 40 : 95 - 107
  • [25] Coupling of crop and livestock production can reduce the agricultural GHG emission from smallholder farms
    Xu, Xiangbo
    Xu, Yan
    LI, Jing
    lU, Yonglong
    Jenkins, Alan
    Ferrier, Robert C.
    Li, Hong
    Stenseth, Nils Chr
    Hessen, Dag O.
    Zhang, Linxiu
    Li, Chang
    Gu, Baojing
    Jin, Shuqin
    Sun, Mingxing
    Ouyang, Zhu
    Mathijs, Erik
    ISCIENCE, 2023, 26 (06)
  • [26] Quantifying the environmental impacts of alfalfa production in different farming systems
    Ghaderpour, Omid
    Rafiee, Shahin
    Sharifi, Mohammad
    Mousavi-Avval, Seyed Hashem
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2018, 27 : 109 - 118
  • [27] On farm biogas production: A method to reduce GHG emissions and develop more sustainable livestock operations
    Masse, D. I.
    Talbot, G.
    Gilbert, Y.
    ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 166-67 : 436 - 445
  • [28] Environmental impacts associated with hydrogen production in La Guajira, Colombia
    Ullman, Amanda N.
    Kittner, Noah
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 4 (05):
  • [29] Environmental impacts of eucalypt and maritime pine wood production in Portugal
    Dias, Ana Claudia
    Arroja, Luis
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 37 : 368 - 376
  • [30] OpenConcrete: a tool for estimating the environmental impacts from concrete production
    Kim, Alyson
    Cunningham, Patrick R.
    Kamau-Devers, Kanotha
    Miller, Sabbie A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH: INFRASTRUCTURE AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 2 (04):