A comparison of past and present computational methods for shape analysis of double-shell x-ray radiographs

被引:2
|
作者
Goodarzi, Saba [1 ]
Levesque, Joseph M. [1 ]
Merritt, Elizabeth C. [1 ]
Sauppe, Joshua P. [1 ]
Montgomery, David S. [1 ]
Loomis, Eric N. [1 ]
Dunkley, Noah K. [1 ]
Keiter, Paul A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
来源
REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS | 2023年 / 94卷 / 05期
关键词
25;
D O I
10.1063/5.0123931
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
Implosion symmetry is a key requirement in achieving a robust burning plasma in inertial confinement fusion experiments. In double-shell capsule implosions, we are interested in the shape of the inner shell as it pushes on the fuel. Shape analysis is a popular technique for studying said symmetry during implosion. Combinations of filtering and contour-finding algorithms are studied for their promise in reliably recovering Legendre shape coefficients from synthetic radiographs of double-shell capsules with applied levels of noise. A radial lineout max(slope) method when used on an image pre-filtered with non-local means and a variant of the marching squares algorithm are able to recover p(0), p(2), and p(4) maxslope Legendre shape coefficients with mean pixel discrepancy errors of 2.81 and 3.06, respectively, for the noisy synthetic radiographs we consider. This improves upon prior radial lineout methods paired with Gaussian filtering, which we show to be unreliable and whose performance is dependent on input parameters that are difficult to estimate.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Replicated grazing incidence X-ray optics:: Past, present and future
    Hudec, R
    Pína, L
    Inneman, A
    X-RAY OPTICS, INSTRUMENTS, AND MISSIONS II, 1999, 3766 : 62 - 71
  • [32] Biological X-ray microanalysis: The past, present practices, and future prospects
    Echlin, P
    MICROSCOPY AND MICROANALYSIS, 2001, 7 (02) : 211 - 219
  • [33] Contact X-ray brachytherapy for rectal cancer: Past, present, and future
    Gerard, J-P
    Barbet, N.
    Dejean, C.
    Montagne, L.
    Benezery, K.
    Coquard, R.
    Doyen, J.
    Labrunie, J. Durand
    Hannoun-Levi, J-M
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2021, 25 (08): : 795 - 800
  • [34] X-RAY METHODS IN CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
    LIEBHAFSKY, HA
    ZEMANY, PD
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1955, 27 (02) : 313 - 313
  • [35] X-RAY METHODS IN CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
    LIEBHAFSKY, HA
    ZEMANY, PD
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1955, 27 (07) : 1205 - 1205
  • [36] X-RAY DETERMINATION OF SULFUR IN OILS - COMPARISON OF X-RAY EMISSION AND ABSORPTION METHODS
    DOUGHMAN, WR
    SULLIVAN, AP
    HIRT, RC
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1958, 30 (12) : 1924 - 1925
  • [37] Diagnostic x-ray spectra: A comparison of spectra generated by different computational methods with a measured spectrum
    Bhat, M
    Pattison, J
    Bibbo, G
    Caon, M
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (01) : 114 - 120
  • [38] Structural characterisation of a cyanomesogen by X-ray diffraction and computational methods
    Vinutha, N.
    Kumara, Karthik
    Thiyagaraj, S.
    Usha, M. K.
    Revannasiddaiah, D.
    Lokanath, N. K.
    MOLECULAR PHYSICS, 2024,
  • [39] Advances in Computational Methods for X-Ray Optics III Introduction
    del Rio, Manuel Sanchez
    Chubar, Oleg
    ADVANCES IN COMPUTATIONAL METHODS FOR X-RAY OPTICS III, 2014, 9209
  • [40] COMPARISON OF POWER SUPPLIES AND X-RAY TUBES FOR X-RAY SPECTROCHEMICAL ANALYSIS
    SPIELBERG, N
    MACK, M
    SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA, 1958, 12 (04): : 382 - 382