The complexities of integrating evidence-based preventative health into England's NHS: lessons learnt from the case of PrEP

被引:2
作者
Khan, Tehseen [1 ,3 ]
Coultas, Clare [1 ,4 ]
Kieslich, Katharina [2 ]
Littlejohns, Peter [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, London, England
[2] Univ Vienna, Dept Polit Sci, Univ Str 7, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[3] 57 Stamford Hill, London N16 5SR, England
[4] Kings Coll London, Sch Educ Commun & Soc, Waterloo Bridge Wing,Waterloo Rd, London SE1 9NS, England
[5] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, Ctr Implementat Sci, Publ Hlth, 16 Crespigny Pk, London SE5 8AB, England
关键词
PrEP; Evidence-based policy; Preventative health; NHS commissioning; HIV; PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; PUBLIC-HEALTH; POLICY; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12961-023-00998-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe integration of preventative health services into England's National Health Service is one of the cornerstones of current health policy. This integration is primarily envisaged through the removal of legislation that blocks collaborations between NHS organisations, local government, and community groups.Aims and objectivesThis paper aims to illustrate why these actions are insufficient through the case study of the PrEP judicial review.MethodsThrough an interview study with 15 HIV experts (commissioners, activists, clinicians, and national health body representatives), we explore the means by which the HIV prevention agenda was actively blocked, when NHS England denied responsibility for funding the clinically effective HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) drug in 2016, a case that led to judicial review. We draw on Wu et al.'s (Policy Soc 34:165-171, 2016) conceptual framing of 'policy capacity' in undertaking this analysis.ResultsThe analyses highlight three main barriers to collaborating around evidence-based preventative health which indicate three main competence/capability issues in regard to policy capacity: latent stigma of 'lifestyle conditions' (individual-analytical capacity); the invisibility of prevention in the fragmented health and social care landscape related to issues of evidence generation and sharing, and public mobilisation (organizational-operational capacity); and institutional politics and distrust (systemic-political capacity).Discussion and conclusionWe suggest that the findings hold implications for other 'lifestyle' conditions that are tackled through interventions funded by multiple healthcare bodies. We extend the discussion beyond the 'policy capacity and capabilities' approach to connect with a wider range of insights from the policy sciences, aimed at considering the range of actions needed for limiting the potential of commissioners to 'pass the buck' in regard to evidence-based preventative health.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, 5 YEAR FORW VIEW
[2]  
ASH UK - Action on Smoking and Health and Cancer Research UK, 2019, CHANGING LANDSCAPE S
[3]  
BBC, 2022, PION MIDDL HER ADD C
[4]   Ideas and social policy: An institutionalist perspective [J].
Beland, D .
SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2005, 39 (01) :1-18
[5]   The Politics of Policy Paradigms [J].
Beland, Daniel ;
Cox, Robert Henry .
GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS, 2013, 26 (02) :193-195
[6]   Personal responsibility for health as a rationing criterion: why we don't like it and why maybe we should [J].
Buyx, A. M. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2008, 34 (12) :871-874
[7]   Cost effective but unaffordable: an emerging challenge for health systems [J].
Charlton, Victoria ;
Littlejohns, Peter ;
Kieslich, Katharina ;
Mitchell, Polly ;
Rumbold, Benedict ;
Weale, Albert ;
Wilson, James ;
Rid, Annette .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 356
[8]  
Clark Sarah, 2012, J Health Organ Manag, V26, P293
[9]  
Cook J, 2019, GP ONLINE
[10]   Limits to health care: Fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers [J].
Daniels, N ;
Sabin, J .
PHILOSOPHY & PUBLIC AFFAIRS, 1997, 26 (04) :303-350