Exploring Relationship Among Self-Regulated Learning, Self-Efficacy and Engagement in Blended Collaborative Context

被引:15
作者
Zhao, Shu-rong [1 ]
Cao, Cui-hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Womens Univ, 399 Daxue Rd, Jinan 250002, Peoples R China
来源
SAGE OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
collaborative blended learning; self-regulated learning; self-efficacy; engagement; workload; interaction; FLIPPED-CLASSROOM APPROACH; HIGHER-EDUCATION; ENVIRONMENT; ANALYTICS; PERCEPTIONS; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGIES; EXPERIENCE; UNIVERSITY; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1177/21582440231157240
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Collaboration proves to be an effective way to facilitate students' engagement and solve the mostly-mentioned problems of blended learning (BL). For collaborative BL, self-regulated learning (SRL), self-efficacy and engagement are frequently referred to in BL studies and represent key elements of effective BL. Furthermore, the interaction of these elements correlates closely with the performance of students. There have been few research attempts to draw synergies and explore the relationship among these key elements. To address this gap, data were collected through a questionnaire and records on LMS from 125 students in a Chinese university. Descriptive analytics show that students fully recognize the positive effects of collaborative BL. Correlation analysis and regression analysis find that self-regulated learning (SRL) is significantly correlated with all factors except workload. It is also a significant predictor of behavioral engagement. Therefore, SRL proves to be central among the essential BL elements. Emotional engagement is significantly correlated to and interact with multiple key BL factors. Specifically, emotional engagement is a significant predictor of behavioral engagement. The findings offer insight into the interactions of key elements of BL and provide practical implications for improving BL learning design.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
[11]  
Chen J. W., 2017, J XIAN INT STUDIES U, V25, P58, DOI [10.16362/j.cnki.cn61-1457/h.2017.04.012, DOI 10.16362/J.CNKI.CN61-1457/H.2017.04.012]
[12]   Students' self-regulation for interaction with others in online learning environments [J].
Cho, Moon-Heum ;
Kim, B. Joon .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 17 :69-75
[13]  
Clow D., 2012, 2 INT C LEARN AN KNO, DOI [10.1145/2330601.2330636, DOI 10.1145/2330601.2330636]
[14]  
Coates H., 2006, STUDENT ENGAGEMENT C
[15]  
Conole G., 2011, LAK 11 P 1 INT C LEA
[16]  
Conrad D. L., 2002, American Journal of Distance Education, V16, P205, DOI 10.1207/S15389286AJDE1604_2
[17]   Challenges in assessing the nature of effective collaboration in blended university courses [J].
Ellis, Robert ;
Bliuc, Ana-Maria ;
Han, Feifei .
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 37 (01) :1-14
[18]   Applications of learning analytics in Latin America [J].
Falcao, Taciana Pontual ;
Mello, Rafael Ferreira ;
Rodrigues, Rodrigo Lins .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 51 (04) :871-874
[19]   School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence [J].
Fredricks, JA ;
Blumenfeld, PC ;
Paris, AH .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 74 (01) :59-109
[20]   Optimization design of the online learning environment for ethnic college students: the perspective of the emotional participation [J].
Gao, Jie ;
Zhao, Bo ;
Xiong, Ying ;
Gan, Jianhou .
INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2021, 29 (08) :1288-1300