Artificial intelligence education for radiographers, an evaluation of a UK postgraduate educational intervention using participatory action research: a pilot study

被引:18
作者
van de Venter, Riaan [1 ,2 ]
Skelton, Emily [2 ,3 ]
Matthew, Jacqueline [3 ,4 ]
Woznitza, Nick [5 ,6 ]
Tarroni, Giacomo [7 ,8 ]
Hirani, Shashivadan P. [9 ]
Kumar, Amrita [10 ]
Malik, Rizwan [2 ,11 ]
Malamateniou, Christina [2 ,3 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Nelson Mandela Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Clin Care Sci, Dept Radiog, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
[2] City Univ London, Sch Hlth & Psychol Sci, Div Midwifery & Radiog, London, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Dept Perinatal Imaging & Hlth, London, England
[4] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[5] Univ Coll London Hosp, Radiol Dept, London, England
[6] Canterbury Christ Church Univ, Sch Allied & Publ Hlth Profess, Canterbury, England
[7] City Univ London, Dept Comp Sci, Cit AI, London, England
[8] Imperial Coll London, Dept Comp, BioMedIA, London, England
[9] City Univ London, Ctr Healthcare Innovat Res, London, England
[10] Frimley Hlth NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[11] Royal Bolton Hosp, Farnworth, England
[12] HESAV Univ, Dept Radiog, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Radiography; Education; Evaluation; Action research; HEALTH-CARE; TELEHEALTH; INNOVATION; ONLINE;
D O I
10.1186/s13244-023-01372-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI)-enabled applications are increasingly being used in providing healthcare services, such as medical imaging support. Sufficient and appropriate education for medical imaging professionals is required for successful AI adoption. Although, currently, there are AI training programmes for radiologists, formal AI education for radiographers is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate and discuss a postgraduate-level module on AI developed in the UK for radiographers.MethodologyA participatory action research methodology was applied, with participants recruited from the first cohort of students enrolled in this module and faculty members. Data were collected using online, semi-structured, individual interviews and focus group discussions. Textual data were processed using data-driven thematic analysis.ResultsSeven students and six faculty members participated in this evaluation. Results can be summarised in the following four themes: a. participants' professional and educational backgrounds influenced their experiences, b. participants found the learning experience meaningful concerning module design, organisation, and pedagogical approaches, c. some module design and delivery aspects were identified as barriers to learning, and d. participants suggested how the ideal AI course could look like based on their experiences.ConclusionsThe findings of our work show that an AI module can assist educators/academics in developing similar AI education provisions for radiographers and other medical imaging and radiation sciences professionals. A blended learning delivery format, combined with customisable and contextualised content, using an interprofessional faculty approach is recommended for future similar courses.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2016, DOING QUALITATIVE RE, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781473921955
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, The Topol Review: Preparing the healthcare workforce to deliver the digital future
  • [3] Factors affecting frontline staff acceptance of telehealth technologies: a mixed-method systematic review
    Brewster, Liz
    Mountain, Gail
    Wessels, Bridgette
    Kelly, Ciara
    Hawley, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2014, 70 (01) : 21 - 33
  • [4] Brink H., 2018, Fundamentals of research methodology for health care professionals
  • [5] Digital Education for Health Professionals: An Evidence Map, Conceptual Framework, and Research Agenda
    Car, Lorainne Tudor
    Poon, Selina
    Kyaw, Bhone Myint
    Cook, David A.
    Ward, Victoria
    Atun, Rifat
    Majeed, Azeem
    Johnston, Jamie
    van der Kleij, Rianne M. J. J.
    Molokhia, Mariam
    Wangenheim, Florian, V
    Lupton, Martin
    Chavannes, Niels
    Ajuebor, Onyema
    Prober, Charles G.
    Car, Josip
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (03)
  • [6] Carr W., 2003, Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research
  • [7] Chan Kai Siang, 2019, JMIR Med Educ, V5, pe13930, DOI 10.2196/13930
  • [8] Artificial Intelligence Education Programs for Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review
    Charow, Rebecca
    Jeyakumar, Tharshini
    Younus, Sarah
    Dolatabadi, Elham
    Salhia, Mohammad
    Al-Mouaswas, Dalia
    Anderson, Melanie
    Balakumar, Sarmini
    Clare, Megan
    Dhalla, Azra
    Gillan, Caitlin
    Haghzare, Shabnam
    Jackson, Ethan
    Lalani, Nadim
    Mattson, Jane
    Peteanu, Wanda
    Tripp, Tim
    Waldorf, Jacqueline
    Williams, Spencer
    Tavares, Walter
    Wiljer, David
    [J]. JMIR MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 7 (04):
  • [9] Thematic analysis
    Clarke, Victoria
    Braun, Virginia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 12 (03) : 297 - 298
  • [10] Cohen ManionL., 2011, Research methods in education, V7th, DOI [10.4324/9780203029053-29, DOI 10.4324/9780203029053]