Machine learning-based ground motion models for predicting PSAs of borehole motions in Japan

被引:0
作者
Kang, Sinhang [1 ]
Mun, Eunbi [2 ]
Phuong, Dung Tran Thi [2 ]
Kim, Byungmin [2 ]
机构
[1] Hannam Univ, 70,Hannam Ro, Daejeon 34430, South Korea
[2] Ulsan Natl Inst Sci & Technol, 50,UNIST Gil,Eonyang Eup,Ulju Gun, Ulsan 44919, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Borehole motion; Ground motion model; KiK-net; Machine learning; Japan; SUBDUCTION INTERFACE EARTHQUAKES; 5-PERCENT-DAMPED PSA; NGA-WEST2; EQUATIONS; CRUSTAL; PGA; ACCELERATION; COMPONENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10950-024-10203-w
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Numerous ground-motion models (GMMs) that predict the intensities of surface ground motions have been previously developed based on regression analysis (RA). This study develops GMMs to estimate 5% damped pseudo-spectral accelerations (PSAs) for 30 periods (0.01-7.0 s) for within-rock ground motions, based on machine learning (ML) methods (i.e., two ensemble methods (random forest (RF) and gradient boosting (GB)) and an artificial neural network (ANN)). GMMs are developed separately for four earthquake types (main and aftershocks of active crustal region events and those of subduction zone interface events), considering the differences in the characteristics of each earthquake type. We utilize 20,041 ground motions recorded at 575 borehole stations in Japan during 602 earthquakes with moment magnitudes greater than 5.0 and rupture distances shorter than 300 km. The prediction performances of GMMs based on RF, GB, ANN, and RA are evaluated by the standard deviations of the total, between-event, and within-event residuals. The GMMs based on the three ML methods (RF, GB, and ANN) perform better than the RA-based models. The RF-based GMMs resulted in the most accurate prediction of the PSAs of within-rock ground motions with a small bias and variance, which can enhance the seismic designs and seismic hazard assessments for underground structures.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 518
页数:28
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] ABRAHAMSON NA, 1992, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V82, P505
  • [2] ATKINSON GM, 1993, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V83, P1778
  • [3] Complexity of training ReLU neural network
    Boob, Digvijay
    Dey, Santanu S.
    Lan, Guanghui
    [J]. DISCRETE OPTIMIZATION, 2022, 44
  • [4] Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s
    Boore, David M.
    Atkinson, Gail M.
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2008, 24 (01) : 99 - 138
  • [5] NGA-West2 Equations for Predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% Damped PSA for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes
    Boore, David M.
    Stewart, Jonathan P.
    Seyhan, Emel
    Atkinson, Gail M.
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2014, 30 (03) : 1057 - 1085
  • [6] Orientation-Independent, Nongeometric-Mean Measures of Seismic Intensity from Two Horizontal Components of Motion
    Boore, David M.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2010, 100 (04) : 1830 - 1835
  • [7] BOORE DM, 1989, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V79, P1736
  • [8] NGA-West2 Research Project
    Bozorgnia, Yousef
    Abrahamson, Norman A.
    Al Atik, Linda
    Ancheta, Timothy D.
    Atkinson, Gail M.
    Baker, Jack W.
    Baltay, Annemarie
    Boore, David M.
    Campbell, Kenneth W.
    Chiou, Brian S. -J.
    Darragh, Robert
    Day, Steve
    Donahue, Jennifer
    Graves, Robert W.
    Gregor, Nick
    Hanks, Thomas
    Idriss, I. M.
    Kamai, Ronnie
    Kishida, Tadahiro
    Kottke, Albert
    Mahin, Stephen A.
    Rezaeian, Sanaz
    Rowshandel, Badie
    Seyhan, Emel
    Shahi, Shrey
    Shantz, Tom
    Silva, Walter
    Spudich, Paul
    Stewart, Jonathan P.
    Watson-Lamprey, Jennie
    Wooddell, Kathryn
    Youngs, Robert
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2014, 30 (03) : 973 - 987
  • [9] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [10] A horizontal ground-motion model for crustal and subduction earthquakes in Taiwan
    Chao, Shu-Hsien
    Chiou, Brian
    Hsu, Chiao-Chu
    Lin, Po-Shen
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2020, 36 (02) : 463 - 506