Conventional and advanced exergy-exergoeconomic-exergoenvironmental analyses of an organic Rankine cycle integrated with solar and biomass energy sources

被引:9
|
作者
Qi, Xinrui [1 ]
Yang, Chunsheng [2 ]
Huang, Mingyang [3 ]
Ma, Zhenjun [3 ]
Hnydiuk-Stefan, Anna [4 ]
Feng, Ke [5 ]
Siarry, Patrick [6 ]
Krolczyk, Grzegorz [7 ]
Li, Z. [7 ]
机构
[1] Ocean Univ China, Sch Engn, Qingdao 266100, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Univ, Inst Artificial Intelligence, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Wollongong, Sustainable Bldg Res Ctr, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[4] Opole Univ Technol, Fac Prod Engn & Logist, PL-45758 Opole, Poland
[5] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Ind Syst Engn & Management, Singapore 117576, Singapore
[6] Univ Paris Est Creteil Val de Marne, Lab Images Signals & Intelligent Syst, F-94010 Creteil, France
[7] Opole Univ Technol, Fac Mech Engn, PL-45758 Opole, Poland
关键词
Exergoenvironmental analysis; Exergoeconomic analysis; Advanced exergy; Two-state ORC; FUEL-CELL; POWER; OPTIMIZATION; HEAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2023.129657
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Considering the huge consumption of traditional energy and the rising demand for electricity, the development of renewable energy is very necessary. In this paper, an energy system integrating biomass energy, solar and twostage organic Rankine cycle (ORC) is proposed, which uses the stable energy output of biomass energy to compensate for the volatility of solar modules. The proposed system comprises a biomass boiler, photovoltaic thermal panels (PV/T), evaporators, condensers, working medium pumps, turbines, a preheater and an air preheater. In addition, conventional and advanced exergy, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental (3E) analyses are carried out. Conventional 3E analyses reveal two components that require priority improvement. They are respectively evaporator 1 with the largest exergy destruction (708.2 kW) and exergy destruction environmental impact rate (775.3 mPt/h) and evaporator 2 with the largest exergy destruction cost rate (19.15$/h). The results of advanced 3E analyses show that the largest avoidable endogenous exergy destruction is condenser 1 (136.6 kW), the largest avoidable endogenous exergy destruction cost rate is condenser 2 (3.377$/h), and the largest avoidable endogenous exergy destruction environmental impact rate is condenser 1 (196.1mPt/h). These mean that these components have great potential for improvement in reducing exergy destruction, saving cost and protecting the environment. In addition, the avoidable endogenous exergy destruction/cost/environmental impact rate of evaporator 2 are negative, so evaporator 2 is not suitable as a priority component for improvement, which is contrary to the conclusions of conventional 3E analyses. It is found that conventional 3E analyses can only point out the biggest exergy destruction point, but cannot indicate whether the components with the greatest exergy destruction have the greatest potential for improvement. However, advanced 3E analyses can show the improvement potential of each component by improving its own performance and the external conditions. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct advanced 3E analyses.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analyses of novel solar-and biomass-driven trigeneration system integrated with organic Rankine cycle
    Yang, Kun
    He, Yiyun
    Du, Na
    Yan, Ping
    Zhu, Neng
    Chen, Yuzhu
    Wang, Jun
    Lund, Peter D.
    ENERGY, 2024, 301
  • [2] Conventional and advanced exergy, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analysis of a biomass integrated gasification combined cycle plant
    Manesh, Mohammad Hasan Khoshgoftar
    Jadidi, Esmaeil
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2024, 46 (01) : 7235 - 7256
  • [3] Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses of solar and biomass electricityed trigeneration system integrated with organic Rankine cycle under thermodynamic function
    Yang, Kun
    Yang, Ziwei
    Du, Na
    Chen, Yuzhu
    Chai, Yufei
    Wang, Jiangjiang
    Cao, Lixiao
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2025, 243
  • [4] Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of an integrated solar combined cycle system
    Cidade Cavalcanti, Eduardo Jose
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 67 : 507 - 519
  • [5] Exergy and exergoeconomic analyses and optimization of geothermal organic Rankine cycle
    El-Emam, Rami Salah
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 59 (1-2) : 435 - 444
  • [6] Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic (3E) analyses of an organic Rankine cycle integrated combined cycle power plant
    Gogoi, T. K.
    Lahon, Dibyani
    Nondy, J.
    THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2023, 41
  • [7] Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic and Emergy-Based Exergoeconomic (Emergoeconomic) Analyses of a Biomass Combustion Waste Heat Recovery Organic Rankine Cycle
    Effatpanah, Saeed Khojaste
    Ahmadi, Mohammad Hossein
    Delbari, Seyed Hamid
    Lorenzini, Giulio
    ENTROPY, 2022, 24 (02)
  • [8] Evaluation of organic Rankine cycle by using hydrocarbons as working fluids: Advanced exergy and advanced exergoeconomic analyses
    Dai, Baomin
    Zhu, Kai
    Wang, Yabo
    Sun, Zhili
    Liu, Zekuan
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 197
  • [9] Investigation of concentrating solar-biomass-fired power technologies based on advanced exergy, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses
    Biboum, Alain
    Yilanci, Ahmet
    Thierry, Sosso Mayi Olivier
    Yimen, Nasser
    Mouangue, Ruben
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2023, 45 (04) : 9668 - 9683
  • [10] Conventional and advanced exergy analyses of an organic Rankine cycle by using the thermodynamic cycle approach
    Wang, Yi
    Qin, Guoliang
    Zhang, Yong
    Yang, Shuhua
    Liu, Changsheng
    Jia, Cheng
    Cui, Qin
    ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (12) : 2474 - 2492