The Gender-Specific Binegativity Scale: Validation in a Spanish Sample of University Students and Proposal of a Brief Version

被引:0
作者
Castillo-Mayen, Rosario [1 ,2 ]
Vivas, Sebastian [1 ,2 ]
Garcia-Torres, Francisco [1 ,2 ]
Tabernero, Carmen [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Santiago-Sillero, Sandra [2 ]
Onieva-Caston, Laura [2 ]
Luque, Barbara [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Maimonides Biomed Res Inst Cordoba IMIB, Cordoba, Spain
[2] Univ Cordoba, Dept Psychol, Avda San Alberto Magno S-N, Cordoba 14071, Spain
[3] Univ Salamanca, Inst Neurociencias Castilla & Leon INCYL, Salamanca, Spain
[4] Univ Salamanca, Dept Social Psychol & Anthropol, Salamanca, Spain
关键词
Gender-Specific Binegativity Scale; Validation; Confirmatory factor analysis; Reliability; External validation; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; ATTITUDES; HEALTH; BISEXUALITY; RECOMMENDATIONS; ORIENTATION; TRANSGENDER; EXPERIENCES; HOMOPHOBIA; INVENTORY;
D O I
10.1007/s13178-023-00912-1
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
IntroductionBisexuality is a more frequent and vulnerable sexual orientation than homosexuality. Yet it has received considerably less attention, resulting in the limited availability of valid measures to detect negative attitudes toward bisexual individuals, even in countries where social rights are notably promoted. This study aims to provide validation of a Spanish version of the Gender-Specific Binegativity Scale and propose a brief version to assess binegativity toward bisexual women and men separately.MethodsIn 2019, 495 university students completed the women's and men's subscales for the Gender-Specific Binegativity Scale and other measures (social dominance orientation, homonegativity, ambivalent sexism, social desirability) for external validity.ResultsExploratory factor analysis supported the one-factor solution of the original 30-item measure. However, confirmatory factor analysis indicated a poor model fit for this version but a satisfactory fit for an 8-item version with parallel items for both subscales. Reliability and external validity were confirmed for both subscales in both versions. Bisexual men were rated more negatively than bisexual women, and men rated bisexual women and men more negatively than women.ConclusionsThe results support a validation of the Gender-Specific Binegativity Scale in Spanish. Moreover, the proposed brief version appears more psychometrically sound and efficient, facilitating its use in research and applied contexts.Policy ImplicationsOnly valid and efficient tools allow for a confident assessment of current attitudes toward minorities. This is the first step to understanding attitudes particular societies might hold, which is essential for the development of coherent policies and competent assessment of social interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 296
页数:18
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   The role of entitlement, social dominance orientation, and right-wing authoritarianism in the prediction of homonegativity for heterosexual white men [J].
Adelman, Andrew L. ;
Awad, Germine H. ;
Bennett, Ashley ;
Nguyen, Hien .
ANALYSES OF SOCIAL ISSUES AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2021, 21 (01) :784-805
[2]   Correlates of Attitudes Toward Bisexuality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Anderson, Joel ;
Maugeri, Julia .
JOURNAL OF HOMOSEXUALITY, 2024, 71 (01) :259-292
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, INVISIBLE MAJORITY D
[4]  
Bennett K., 1992, Closer To Home, P205
[5]  
Castromonte BJB, 2017, PROPOS REPRESENT, V5, P245, DOI 10.20511/pyr2017.v5n2.162
[6]   How well are outgroup attitudes and behaviours toward bisexual individuals measured? A systematic review of the psychometric properties of binegativity measures [J].
Bishop, C. J. ;
Pynoo, Emily .
PSYCHOLOGY & SEXUALITY, 2022, 13 (02) :182-200
[7]  
Cabrera-Nguyen P, 2010, J Soc Social Work Res, V1, P99, DOI [DOI 10.5243/JSSWR.2010.8, 10.5243/jsswr.2010.8]
[8]   A POWER PRIMER [J].
COHEN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) :155-159
[9]  
Comrey A. L., 1992, 1 COURSE FACTOR ANAL, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315827506-16
[10]   A NEW SCALE OF SOCIAL DESIRABILITY INDEPENDENT OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY [J].
CROWNE, DP ;
MARLOWE, D .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING PSYCHOLOGY, 1960, 24 (04) :349-354