Impact of Scleral Lens Front Surface Eccentricity on Visual Acuity, Contrast Sensitivity, and Higher-Order Aberrations in Eyes With Keratoconus

被引:1
作者
Badrinarayanan, Aparna [1 ]
Balakrishnan, Akshaya C. [1 ]
Dutta, Ronit [1 ]
Kumar, R. Mahesh [1 ]
Iqbal, Asif [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sankara Nethralaya, Unit Med Res Fdn, Dept Contact Lens, Chennai, India
[2] Sankara Nethralaya Med Res Fdn, Dept Contact Lens, 18,Coll Rd, Chennai 600006, Tamilnadu, India
来源
EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE | 2023年 / 49卷 / 09期
关键词
Scleral lens; Keratoconus; Front surface eccentricity; Higher-order aberration; Visual acuity; Contrast sensitivity; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; REHABILITATION; ASPHERICITY; ANTERIOR;
D O I
10.1097/ICL.0000000000001007
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the effect of front surface eccentricity (FSE) of scleral lenses (SLs) on corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), contrast sensitivity (CS), and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) in keratoconic eyes.Methods: Fifteen keratoconic eyes fitted with BostonSight SCLERAL lenses of different eccentricity values (FSE0=0, FSE1=0.30, and FSE2=0.60). CDVA, CS, and HOAs were measured at baseline and after 30 min of SL wear. CDVA and CS were measured with the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study and Pelli-Robson chart, respectively, and iTrace aberrometer was used to evaluate the HOAs.Results: Baseline CDVA was 0.30 +/- 0.29, which significantly improved to 0.10 +/- 0.11, 0.05 +/- 0.06, and 0.05 +/- 0.08 logMAR with FSE0, FSE1, and FSE2, respectively (P<0.05). The post hoc showed no significant difference between eccentricities. Baseline CS was 1.19 +/- 0.47, which improved to 1.54 +/- 0.12, 1.59 +/- 0.10, and 1.60 +/- 0.11 with FSE0, FSE1, and FSE2, respectively (P<0.01), but post hoc showed no significant difference between eccentricities. A statistically significant reduction was found in HOAs when compared with baseline (P<0.01). Comparison between eccentricities showed a significant difference only between FSE0 and FSE1 for RMS coma (P=0.01) and RMS spherical aberrations (P=0.004) where FSE1 showed better performance in reducing HOAs compared with FSE0. HO-RMS, RMS secondary astigmatism, and RMS trefoil showed no significant difference between eccentricities, but FSE1 and FSE2 performed superior to FSE0.Conclusion: BostonSight SCLERAL lenses with varying eccentricities corrected a significant amount of HOAs and improved CDVA and CS in keratoconus patients. Practitioners should be aware of this distinct feature of SLs and use it as needed to improve visual performance.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 378
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [11] The Impact of the Boston Ocular Surface Prosthesis on Wavefront Higher-Order Aberrations
    Gumus, Koray
    Gire, Anisa
    Pflugfelder, Stephen C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 151 (04) : 682 - 690
  • [12] Comparison of Wavefront-guided and Best Conventional Scleral Lenses after Habituation in Eyes with Corneal Ectasia
    Hastings, Gareth D.
    Applegate, Raymond A.
    Lan Chi Nguyen
    Kauffman, Matthew J.
    Hemmati, Roxana T.
    Marsack, Jason D.
    [J]. OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2019, 96 (04) : 238 - 247
  • [13] Corneal topography using the Holladay Diagnostic Summary
    Holladay, JT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1997, 23 (02) : 209 - 221
  • [14] Hussoin TR., 2009, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, V50, P6349
  • [15] The Effect of Optic Asphericity on Visual Rehabilitation of Corneal Ectasia With a Prosthetic Device
    Hussoin, Trisha
    Le, Hong-Gam
    Carrasquillo, Karen G.
    Johns, Lynette
    Rosenthal, Perry
    Jacobs, Deborah S.
    [J]. EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 38 (05): : 300 - 305
  • [16] Jagadeesh Divya, 2014, J Optom, V7, P108, DOI 10.1016/j.optom.2013.04.001
  • [17] The effect of scleral lenses on vision, refraction and aberrations in post-LASIK ectasia, keratoconus and pellucid marginal degeneration
    Kumar, Mukesh
    Shetty, Rohit
    Lalgudi, Vaitheeswaran G.
    Khamar, Pooja
    Vincent, Stephen J.
    Atchison, David A.
    [J]. OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2021, 41 (04) : 664 - 672
  • [18] Effects of a semi-scleral contact lens on refraction and higher order aberrations
    Kumar, Mukesh
    Shetty, Rohit
    Dutta, Debarun
    Rao, Harsha L.
    Jayadev, Chaitra
    Atchison, David A.
    [J]. CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2019, 42 (06) : 670 - 674
  • [19] Kumar P., 2019, Contact Lens Anterior Eye, V42, pe27
  • [20] Do visual performance and optical quality vary across different contact lens correction modalities in keratoconus?
    Kumar, Preetam
    Bandela, Praveen K.
    Bharadwaj, Shrikant R.
    [J]. CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE, 2020, 43 (06) : 568 - 576