Biomechanical effects of iatrogenic muscle-ligaments complex damage on adjacent segments following posterior lumbar interbody fusion: A finite element analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Wei, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Tianhao [2 ]
Li, Jian [1 ]
Liu, Jianheng [2 ]
Mao, Keya [2 ]
Pan, Chun'ang [3 ,4 ]
Li, Hui [3 ,4 ]
Zhao, Yongfei [2 ]
机构
[1] China Aerosp Sci & Ind Corp 731 Hosp, Dept Orthopaed 2, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Med Ctr 4, Dept Orthopaed, 28 Fuxing Rd, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Engn & Technol Res Ctr Med Endoplants, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Engn Lab Funct Med Mat & Instruments, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Lumbar; finite element analysis; adjacent segment; multifidus; posterior ligament complex; RISK-FACTORS; PARASPINAL MUSCLE; DEGENERATION; LAMINECTOMY; MULTIFIDUS; SPINE; DISEASE; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1177/03913988231203586
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective: To analyze the biomechanical effects of proximal iatrogenic muscle-ligaments complex (MLC) damage on adjacent segments following posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) by finite element (FE) analysis. Methods: The multifidus muscle force was loaded in the validated intact lumbosacral finite element model. Based on whether undergoing PLIF or the proximal MLC damage, three models were established. Range of motion (ROM) and the maximum von Mises (VM) stress of adjacent segments were analyzed, as well as the average muscle force and work capacity in four loading directions. Results: PLIF results in significant changes in ROM and stress. ROM changed significantly in the upper adjacent segment, the PLIF model changed the most in extension, and the largest change in the lower adjacent segment occurred after MLC damage. The VM stress of the upper adjacent segment occurred in extension of the PLIF model, and that of the lower adjacent segment occurred in rotation after MLC damage. In flexion, ROM, and stress of the damaged MLC fusion model were significantly increased compared with the normal and PLIF models, there was a stepwise amplification. The average muscle force comparison of three models was 5.8530, 12.3185, and 13.4670 N, respectively. The total work capacity comparison was close to that of muscle force. Conclusion: PLIF results in increased ROM and the VM stress of adjacent segments, the proximal MLC damage will aggravate this change. This may increase the risk of ASD and chronic low back pain. Preserving the proximal MLC reduces the biomechanical effects on adjacent segments.
引用
收藏
页码:562 / 568
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biomechanical comparison of instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion with one or two cages by finite element analysis
    Chiang, Ming-Fu
    Zhong, Zheng-Cheng
    Chen, Chen-Sheng
    Cheng, Cheng-Kung
    Shih, Shih-Liang
    SPINE, 2006, 31 (19) : E682 - E689
  • [22] Biomechanical evaluation of autologous bone-cage in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis
    Haodong Zhu
    Weibin Zhong
    Ping Zhang
    Xiaoming Liu
    Junming Huang
    Fatai Liu
    Jian Li
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21
  • [23] Biomechanical evaluation of anterior and posterior lumbar surgical approaches on the adjacent segment: a finite element analysis
    Wang, Bingjin
    Ke, Wencan
    Hua, Wenbin
    Lu, Saideng
    Zeng, Xianlin
    Yang, Cao
    COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 23 (14) : 1109 - 1116
  • [24] Biomechanical evaluation of four different posterior instrumentation techniques for single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis
    Guo, Hui-Zhi
    Tang, Yong-Chao
    Guo, Dan-Qing
    Liang, De
    Zhang, Shun-Cong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 12 (10): : 6160 - 6169
  • [25] Comparative Finite Element Analysis of Lumbar Cortical Screws and Pedicle Screws in Transforaminal and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Sin, Dong Ah
    Heo, Dong Hwa
    NEUROSPINE, 2019, 16 (02) : 298 - 304
  • [26] Impact of cage position on biomechanical performance of stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis
    Nan, Chong
    Ma, Zhanbei
    Liu, Yuxiu
    Ma, Liang
    Li, Jiaqi
    Zhang, Wei
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [27] Biomechanical Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With 1 or 2 Cages by Finite-Element Analysis
    Xu, Hao
    Ju, Wen
    Xu, Neng
    Zhang, Xiaojian
    Zhu, Xiaodong
    Zhu, Lifan
    Qian, Xuefeng
    Wen, Fengbiao
    Wu, Weidong
    Jiang, Fugui
    NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 73 : 198 - 205
  • [28] Determining a relative total lumbar range of motion to alleviate adjacent segment degeneration after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis
    Li, Ke
    Cao, Shuai
    Chen, Jing
    Qin, Jie
    Yuan, Bo
    Li, Jie
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [29] Biomechanical evaluation of modified and traditional cortical bone trajectory technique on adjacent segment degeneration in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-finite element analysis
    Tuoheti, Abudusalamu
    Xiao, Yang
    Wang, Yixi
    Maimaiti, Abulikemu
    Zhang, Rui
    Kahaer, Alafate
    Tuoheti, Abuduaini
    Wu, Xianghui
    Rexiti, Paerhati
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [30] Biomechanical assessment of different transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion constructs in normal and osteoporotic condition: a finite element analysis
    Liu, Chen
    Zhao, Mengmeng
    Zhang, Wencan
    Wang, Chongyi
    Hu, Bingtao
    Wang, Kaibin
    Xu, Wanlong
    Li, Le
    Si, Haipeng
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 24 (06) : 1121 - 1131