Suboptimal performance of LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates

被引:1
|
作者
Oh, Na Eun [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Sang Hyun [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Sehee [3 ]
Lee, Habeen [4 ]
Jang, Hyeon Ji [1 ,2 ]
Byun, Jae Ho [1 ,2 ]
Won, Hyung Jin [1 ,2 ]
Shin, Yong Moon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Res Inst Radiol, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[3] Asan Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[4] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Seoul 05505, South Korea
关键词
Liver; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Transplantation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPA; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; MILAN CRITERIA; CT; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-023-10014-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic performance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, comparing liver transplant candidates (LT group) with patients who underwent surgical resection (SR group), and to determine significant clinical factors for diagnostic performance of LI-RADS v2018.MethodsPatients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and subsequent SR or LT for HCC were retrospectively included between January 2019 and December 2020. The sensitivity and specificity of LI-RADS LR-5 for HCC were compared between the two groups using generalized estimating equations. The accuracy of patient allocation according to the Milan criteria was calculated for the LT group. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine significant clinical factors associated with the sensitivity of LI-RADS.ResultsOf the 281 patients, 237 were assigned to the SR group, and 44 were assigned to the LT group. The LT group showed significantly lower per-patient (48.5% vs. 79.6%, p < .001) and per-lesion sensitivity (31.0% vs. 75.9%, p < .001) than the SR group, whereas no significant difference in both per-patient (100.0% vs. 91.7%, p > .99) and per-lesion specificities (100.0% vs. 94.1%, p > .99). The accuracy of patient allocation was 50.0%. Sensitivity was significantly lower in patients with a smaller lesion size (p < .001), a larger lesion number (p = .002), and a higher Child-Pugh score (p = .009).ConclusionLI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI might be insufficient in liver transplant candidates and other diagnostic imaging tests should be considered in patients with these significant clinical factors.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 474
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Inter-observer agreement and accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 for differentiating tumor in vein from bland thrombus using gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Ichikawa, Shintaro
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Cunha, Guilherme Moura
    Wolfson, Tanya
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Morisaka, Hiroyuki
    Onohara, Kojiro
    Shimizu, Tatsuya
    Omiya, Yoshie
    Sugiyama, Hiroki
    Okumura, Akihiro
    Onishi, Hiroshi
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2023, 48 (08) : 2557 - 2569
  • [42] Inter-observer agreement and accuracy of LI-RADS v2018 for differentiating tumor in vein from bland thrombus using gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Shintaro Ichikawa
    Claude B. Sirlin
    Guilherme Moura Cunha
    Tanya Wolfson
    Kathryn J. Fowler
    Hiroyuki Morisaka
    Kojiro Onohara
    Tatsuya Shimizu
    Yoshie Omiya
    Hiroki Sugiyama
    Akihiro Okumura
    Hiroshi Onishi
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 2557 - 2569
  • [43] Usefulness of Arterial Subtraction in Applying Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Treatment Response Algorithm to Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI
    Youn, Seo Yeon
    Kim, Dong Hwan
    Choi, Joon-Il
    Choi, Moon Hyung
    Kim, Bohyun
    Shin, Yu Ri
    Oh, Soon Nam
    Rha, Sung Eun
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (08) : 1289 - 1299
  • [44] Subtraction Images From Portal Venous Phase Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI for Observing Washout and Enhancing Capsule Features in LI-RADS Version 2018
    Chung, Jae Won
    Yu, Jeong-Sik
    Choi, Jeong Min
    Cho, Eun-Suk
    Kim, Joo Hee
    Chung, Jae-Joon
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2020, 214 (01) : 72 - 80
  • [45] Hepatic Angiomyolipoma Versus Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Noncirrhotic Liver on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI: A Diagnostic Challenge
    Lee, So Jung
    Kim, So Yeon
    Kim, Kyoung Won
    Kim, Jin Hee
    Kim, Hyoung Jung
    Lee, Moon-Gyu
    Yu, Eun Sil
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 207 (03) : 562 - 570
  • [46] Diagnostic accuracy of liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2014 for intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinomas in patients with chronic liver disease on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI
    Joo, Ijin
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Lee, Sang Min
    Lee, Jeong Sub
    Park, Jin Young
    Han, Joon Koo
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2016, 44 (05) : 1330 - 1338
  • [47] A New Diagnostic Criterion with Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI May Improve the Diagnostic Performance for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Wei, Yi
    Ye, Zheng
    Yuan, Yuan
    Huang, Zixing
    Wei, Xiaocheng
    Zhang, Tong
    Wan, Shang
    Tang, Hehan
    He, Xiaopeng
    Song, Bin
    LIVER CANCER, 2020, 9 (04) : 414 - 425
  • [48] Diagnostic performance of CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 in non-cirrhotic hepatitis C virus infection
    Cao, Jennie J.
    Shon, Andy
    Yoon, Luke
    Kamaya, Aya
    Tse, Justin R.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, : 1615 - 1623
  • [49] A Semi-Automatic Step-by-Step Expert-Guided LI-RADS Grading System Based on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI
    Sheng, Ruofan
    Huang, Jing
    Zhang, Weiguo
    Jin, Kaipu
    Yang, Li
    Chong, Huanhuan
    Fan, Jia
    Zhou, Jian
    Wu, Dijia
    Zeng, Mengsu
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA, 2021, 8 : 671 - 683
  • [50] Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI with respect to the severity of liver cirrhosis
    Kim, Ah Yeong
    Kim, Young Kon
    Lee, Min Woo
    Park, Min Jung
    Hwang, Jiyoung
    Lee, Mi Hee
    Lee, Won Jae
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2012, 53 (08) : 830 - 838