Suboptimal performance of LI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates

被引:1
|
作者
Oh, Na Eun [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Sang Hyun [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Sehee [3 ]
Lee, Habeen [4 ]
Jang, Hyeon Ji [1 ,2 ]
Byun, Jae Ho [1 ,2 ]
Won, Hyung Jin [1 ,2 ]
Shin, Yong Moon [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Dept Radiol, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Res Inst Radiol, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[3] Asan Med Ctr, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Seoul 05505, South Korea
[4] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Seoul 05505, South Korea
关键词
Liver; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Transplantation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPA; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; MILAN CRITERIA; CT; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-023-10014-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic performance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) version 2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, comparing liver transplant candidates (LT group) with patients who underwent surgical resection (SR group), and to determine significant clinical factors for diagnostic performance of LI-RADS v2018.MethodsPatients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and subsequent SR or LT for HCC were retrospectively included between January 2019 and December 2020. The sensitivity and specificity of LI-RADS LR-5 for HCC were compared between the two groups using generalized estimating equations. The accuracy of patient allocation according to the Milan criteria was calculated for the LT group. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine significant clinical factors associated with the sensitivity of LI-RADS.ResultsOf the 281 patients, 237 were assigned to the SR group, and 44 were assigned to the LT group. The LT group showed significantly lower per-patient (48.5% vs. 79.6%, p < .001) and per-lesion sensitivity (31.0% vs. 75.9%, p < .001) than the SR group, whereas no significant difference in both per-patient (100.0% vs. 91.7%, p > .99) and per-lesion specificities (100.0% vs. 94.1%, p > .99). The accuracy of patient allocation was 50.0%. Sensitivity was significantly lower in patients with a smaller lesion size (p < .001), a larger lesion number (p = .002), and a higher Child-Pugh score (p = .009).ConclusionLI-RADS v2018 on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI might be insufficient in liver transplant candidates and other diagnostic imaging tests should be considered in patients with these significant clinical factors.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 474
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Optimal lexicon of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma modified from LI-RADS
    Hwang, Shin Hye
    Park, Sumi
    Han, Kyunghwa
    Choi, Jin-young
    Park, Young-Nyun
    Park, Mi-Suk
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (09) : 3078 - 3088
  • [22] LI-RADS category 5 hepatocellular carcinoma: preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for early recurrence risk stratification after curative resection
    Wei, Hong
    Jiang, Hanyu
    Zheng, Tianying
    Zhang, Zhen
    Yang, Caiwei
    Ye, Zheng
    Duan, Ting
    Song, Bin
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (04) : 2289 - 2302
  • [23] Diagnostic Performance of 2018 KLCA-NCC Practice Guideline for Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B or Cirrhosis: Comparison with LI-RADS Version 2018
    Lee, Sang Min
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Ahn, Su Joa
    Kang, Hyo-Jin
    Yang, Hyun Kyung
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (07) : 1066 - 1076
  • [24] Added Value of a Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced Hepatocyte-phase Image to the LI-RADS System for Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Chen, Ningxin
    Motosugi, Utaroh
    Morisaka, Hiroyuki
    Ichikawa, Shintaro
    Sano, Katsuhiro
    Ichikawa, Tomoaki
    Matsuda, Masanori
    Fujii, Hideki
    Onishi, Hiroshi
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 15 (01) : 49 - 59
  • [25] Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: LI-RADS v2017 categorisation for differential diagnosis and prognostication on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging
    Jeon, Sun Kyung
    Joo, Ijin
    Lee, Dong Ho
    Lee, Sang Min
    Kang, Hyo-Jin
    Lee, Kyoung-Bun
    Lee, Jeong Min
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) : 373 - 382
  • [26] Diagnostic performance of CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 in non-cirrhotic steatotic liver disease
    Cao, Jennie
    Shon, Andy
    Yoon, Luke
    Kamaya, Aya
    Tse, Justin R.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (12) : 7622 - 7631
  • [27] Additional value of 10-min far-delayed phase in extracellular contrast agent-enhanced MRI for diagnostic performance of hepatocellular carcinoma based on LI-RADS v2018
    Wang, Jiahui
    Sun, Wei
    Qiu, Qiansai
    Dong, Sanyuan
    Chen, Xiaoshan
    Wang, Wentao
    Yang, Yutao
    Rao, Shengxiang
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2025, 8 (01) : 24 - 34
  • [28] Comparison of guidelines for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in transplantation candidates
    Jeon, Sun Kyung
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Joo, Ijin
    Yoo, Jeongin
    Park, Jin-Young
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (09) : 4762 - 4771
  • [29] LI-RADS treatment response categorization on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: diagnostic performance compared to mRECIST and added value of ancillary features
    Se Woo Kim
    Ijin Joo
    Hyo-Cheol Kim
    Su Joa Ahn
    Hyo-Jin Kang
    Sun Kyung Jeon
    Jeong Min Lee
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 2861 - 2870
  • [30] New strategy of LI-RADS v2018 to improve the sensitivity for small hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 3.0 cm on extracellular-contrast enhanced MRI
    Zhou, Jinhui
    Zhang, Yao
    Zhang, Jing
    Chen, Jingbiao
    Jiang, Hang
    Zhang, Linqi
    Zhong, Xi
    Zhang, Tianhui
    Chen, Lichun
    Wang, Yufeng
    Xu, Yikai
    Wang, Jin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 181