Management of Lobular Neoplasia Diagnosed by Core Biopsy

被引:3
|
作者
Jani, Chinmay [1 ,2 ]
Lotz, Margaret [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Keates, Sarah [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gupta, Yasha [2 ,5 ]
Walker, Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Al Omari, Omar [1 ,2 ]
Parvez, Arshi [1 ,2 ]
Patel, Dipesh [2 ,5 ]
Gnata, Maria [4 ]
Perry, John [6 ]
Khorashadi, Leila [2 ,5 ]
Weissmann, Lisa [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pories, Susan E. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Mt Auburn Hosp, Dept Internal Med, 300 Mt Auburn St, Cambridge, MA USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Mt Auburn Hosp, Div Hematol Oncol, 300 Mt Auburn St, Cambridge, MA USA
[4] Mt Auburn Hosp, Hoffman Breast Ctr, Dept Surg, 300 Mt Auburn St, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[5] Mt Auburn Hosp, Dept Radiol, 300 Mt Auburn St, Cambridge, MA USA
[6] Mt Auburn Hosp, Dept Pathol, 300 Mt Auburn St, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词
NEEDLE-BIOPSY; IN-SITU; BREAST; CARCINOMA; RISK;
D O I
10.1155/2023/8185446
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Lobular neoplasia (LN) involves proliferative changes within the breast lobules. LN is divided into lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH). LCIS can be further subdivided into three subtypes: classic LCIS, pleomorphic LCIS, and LCIS with necrosis (florid type). Because classic LCIS is now considered as a benign etiology, current guidelines recommend close follow-up with imaging versus surgical excision. The goal of our study was to determine if the diagnosis of classic LN on core needle biopsy (CNB) merits surgical excision. This is a retrospective, observational study conducted at Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, MA, from May 17, 2017, through June 30, 2020. We reviewed the data of breast biopsies conducted at our hospital over this period and included patients who were diagnosed with classic LN (LCIS and/or ALH) and excluded patients having any other atypical lesions on CNB. All known cancer patients were excluded. Of the 2707 CNBs performed during the study period, we identified 68 women who were diagnosed with ALH or LCIS on CNB. CNB was performed for an abnormal mammogram in the majority of patients (60; 88%) while 7(10.3%) had an abnormal breast magnetic resonance imaging study (MRI), and 1 had an abnormal ultrasound (US). A total of 58 patients (85%) underwent excisional biopsy, of which 3 (5.2%) showed malignancy, including 2 cases of DCIS and 1 invasive carcinoma. In addition, there was 1 case (1.7%) with pleomorphic LCIS and 11 cases with ADH (15.5%). The management of LN found on core biopsy is evolving, with some advocating surgical excision and others recommending observation. Our data show a change in diagnosis with excisional biopsy in 13 (22.4%) of patients with 2 cases of DCIS, 1 invasive carcinoma, 1 pleomorphic LCIS, and 9 cases of ADH, diagnosed on excisional biopsy. While ALH and classic LCIS are considered benign, the choice of ongoing surveillance versus excisional biopsy should be made with shared decision making with the patient, with consideration of personal and family history, as well as patient preferences.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Low Frequency of Cancer Occurrence in Same Breast Quadrant Diagnosed with Lobular Neoplasia at Percutaneous Needle Biopsy
    Provencher, Louise
    Jacob, Simon
    Cote, Gary
    Hogue, Jean-Charles
    Desbiens, Christine
    Poirier, Brigitte
    Raiche, Isabelle
    Le Regent, Linda
    Diorio, Caroline
    RADIOLOGY, 2012, 263 (01) : 43 - 52
  • [22] Lobular neoplasia in breast core needle biopsy specimens is not associated with an increased risk of ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive carcinoma
    Renshaw, AA
    Cartagena, N
    Derhagopian, RP
    Gould, EW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2002, 117 (05) : 797 - 799
  • [23] Surgical Outcome of Biopsy-Proven Lobular Neoplasia: Is There Any Difference Between Lobular Carcinoma In Situ and Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia?
    Ibrahim, Nathalie
    Bessissow, Ali
    Lalonde, Lucie
    Mesurolle, Benoit
    Trop, Isabelle
    Lisbona, Andre
    El-Khoury, Mona
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (02) : 288 - 291
  • [24] Most lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia diagnosed on core needle biopsy can be managed clinically with radiologic follow-up in a multidisciplinary setting
    Middleton, Lavinia P.
    Sneige, Nour
    Coyne, Robin
    Shen, Yu
    Dong, Wenli
    Dempsey, Peter
    Bevers, Therese B.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2014, 3 (03): : 492 - 499
  • [25] Flat Ductal Intraepithelial Neoplasia 1A Diagnosed at Stereotactic Core Needle Biopsy: Is Excisional Biopsy Indicated?
    Becker, Annalisa K.
    Gordon, Paula B.
    Harrison, Dorothy A.
    Hassell, Patricia R.
    Hayes, Malcolm M.
    van Niekerk, Dirk
    Wilson, Christine M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 200 (03) : 682 - 688
  • [26] Lobular neoplasia in breast core needle biopsy specimens is associated with a low risk of ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive carcinoma on subsequent excision
    Renshaw, Andrew A.
    Derhagopian, Robert P.
    Martinez, Pilar
    Gould, Edwin W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2006, 126 (02) : 310 - 313
  • [27] Descriptive study comparing outcomes of classic and nonclassic lobular carcinoma in situ (florid and pleomorphic) initially diagnosed on core needle biopsy
    Singh, Kamaljeet
    Sung, C. James
    Quddus, M. Ruhul
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (12) : 2350 - 2356
  • [28] Pleomorphic Lobular Carcinoma in Situ Diagnosed by Breast Core Biopsy: Clinicopathologic Features and Correlation With Subsequent Excision
    Guo, Tianhua
    Wang, Yihong
    Shapiro, Nella
    Fineberg, Susan
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2018, 18 (04) : E449 - E454
  • [29] Papillary breast lesions diagnosed by core biopsy require complete excision
    Fu, C. -Y.
    Chen, T. -W.
    Hong, Z. -J.
    Chan, D. -C.
    Young, C. -Y.
    Chen, C. -J.
    Hsieh, C. -B.
    Hsu, H. -H.
    Peng, Y. -J.
    Lu, H. -E.
    Yu, J. -C.
    EJSO, 2012, 38 (11): : 1029 - 1035
  • [30] Lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical lobular hyperplasia at core-needle biopsy: Is excisional biopsy necessary?
    Foster, MC
    Helvie, MA
    Gregory, NE
    Rebner, M
    Nees, AV
    Paramagul, C
    RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (03) : 813 - 819