Environmental Impact Assessment of Low-Density Polyethylene and Polyethylene Terephthalate Containers Using a Life Cycle Assessment Technique

被引:5
作者
Abbasi, Tayebeh [1 ]
Fard, Neamatollah Jaafarzadeh Haghighi [2 ]
Madadizadeh, Farzan [3 ,4 ]
Eslami, Hadi [5 ,6 ]
Ebrahimi, Ali Asghar [1 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci, Environm Sci & Technol Res Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth Engn, Yazd, Iran
[2] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Environm Technol Res Ctr, Ahvaz, Iran
[3] Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci, Ctr Healthcare Data Modeling, Sch publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Yazd, Iran
[4] Shahid Sadoughi Univ Med Sci, Sch publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Yazd, Iran
[5] Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci, Occupat Safety & Hlth Res Ctr, Sch Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth Engn,NICICO, Rafsanjan, Iran
[6] World Safety Org, Occupat Safety & Hlth Res Ctr, Sch Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth Engn,NICICO, Rafsanjan, Iran
关键词
Life cycle assessment (LCA); Environmental Impact Assessment; Polyethylene terephthalate (PET); Low-density polyethylene (LDPE); Waste management; WASTE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS; PLASTIC WASTE; INCINERATION; POLICY; CITY; LCA; MSW;
D O I
10.1007/s10924-023-02806-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the present study, the life cycle of two milk packaging containers (Polyethylene terephthalate PET and low-density polyethylene; LDPE) was assessed with an emphasis on different product-life scenarios in Iran. The functional unit was adjusted to work on one ton of plastic milk packaging containers. The system boundary included all life cycle stages, including resin production, packaging production, collection, transportation, and waste management (mechanical recycling, landfill, incineration). In the production sector, the resin was produced from raw materials and mechanical recycling was defined as producing granules from milk packaging containers. The granules obtained from recycling were used in the production of fruit baskets and disposable agricultural irrigation pipes. The first waste scenario included 10% recycling, 80% landfill, and 10% incineration. The second scenario consisted of 50% recycling, 20% landfill, and 30% incineration. The third scenario had 65% recycling, 10% landfill, and 25% incineration. Input data included using resources (water, raw materials), energy (electricity, fuels), and all emissions based on the function unit. The impact categories consisted of global warming, ozone depletion, fuel consumption, and toxicity to humans. SimaPro 9 software was run and the IMPACT + 2002 assessment method was employed to assess the environmental impact. According to the findings, the recycling process performed better than the landfill and incineration processes in all scenarios. The third scenario was determined as the most beneficent one in waste disposal of the two containers. In all effective categories, except air pollutants, the life cycle impact of PET was greater than that of LDPE. Furthermore, the life cycle impact of PET was greater than that of LDPE in all phases of the cycle except transportation.
引用
收藏
页码:3493 / 3508
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Effects of energy consumption and ecological footprint on CO2 emissions: an empirical evidence from Pakistan
    Abbas, Sohail
    Kousar, Shazia
    Pervaiz, Amber
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 23 (09) : 13364 - 13381
  • [2] Environmental impact assessment of converting flexible packaging plastic waste to pyrolysis oil and multi-walled carbon nanotubes
    Ahamed, Ashiq
    Veksha, Andrei
    Yin, Ke
    Weerachanchai, Piyarat
    Giannis, Apostolos
    Lisak, Grzegorz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2020, 390
  • [3] Review of municipal solid waste management options in Malaysia, with an emphasis on sustainable waste-to-energy options
    Aja, Ogboo Chikere
    Al-Kayiem, Hussain H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CYCLES AND WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2014, 16 (04) : 693 - 710
  • [4] Alabi O.A., 2019, J Toxicol Risk Assess, V5, P1, DOI [10.23937/2572-4061.1510021, DOI 10.23937/2572-4061.1510021]
  • [5] Emergy as a tool for Ecodesign: evaluating materials selection for beverage packages in Brazil
    Almeida, C. M. V. B.
    Rodrigues, A. J. M.
    Bonilla, S. H.
    Giannetti, B. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (01) : 32 - 43
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2006, LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMEN
  • [7] Life cycle assessment of a plastic packaging recycling system
    Arena, U
    Mastellone, ML
    Perugini, F
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2003, 8 (02) : 92 - 98
  • [8] Arvanitoyannis IS, 2008, FOOD SCI TECH-INT SE, P97, DOI 10.1016/B978-012373654-3.50006-7
  • [9] Life Cycle Assessment of the existing and proposed plastic waste management options in India: A case study
    Aryan, Yash
    Yadav, Pooja
    Samadder, Sukha Ranjan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 211 : 1268 - 1283
  • [10] The environmental comparison of landfilling vs. incineration of MSW accounting for waste diversion
    Assamoi, Bernadette
    Lawryshyn, Yuri
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 32 (05) : 1019 - 1030