"You need a team": perspectives on interdisciplinary symptom management using patient-reported outcome measures in hemodialysis care-a qualitative study

被引:10
作者
Baragar, Brigitte [1 ]
Schick-Makaroff, Kara [2 ]
Manns, Braden [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Love, Shannan [1 ]
Donald, Maoliosa [1 ,3 ]
Santana, Maria [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Corradetti, Bonnie [6 ]
Finlay, Juli [1 ]
Johnson, Jeffrey A. [7 ]
Walsh, Michael [8 ,9 ,10 ]
Elliott, Meghan J. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Med, TRW Bldg,3280 Hosp Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, OBrien Inst Publ Hlth, Calgary, AB, Canada
[5] Univ Calgary, Dept Pediat, Calgary, AB, Canada
[6] Alberta Hlth Serv, Kidney Hlth Sect, Med Strateg Clin Network, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[7] Univ Alberta, Sch Publ Hlth, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[8] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[9] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[10] McMaster Univ, Populat Hlth Res Inst, Hamilton Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
Qualitative research; Kidney failure; Hemodialysis; Patient-oriented research; Patient-centered care; Patient-reported outcome measures; CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; OF-LIFE; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; HEALTH-CARE; TRANSDISCIPLINARITY; MULTIDISCIPLINARY; INTERVIEWS; PROGRAM; BURDEN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s41687-022-00538-8
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Plain English summaryPeople with kidney failure receiving hemodialysis are faced with complex symptoms that impact their day-to-day functioning and quality of life. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are tools used by patients to directly communicate symptoms to their care team and guide symptom-focused care. Little is known about how PROMs could be integrated into the team-based care models of outpatient hemodialysis centres. In this study, we conducted interviews with people receiving hemodialysis and their clinicians about their perspectives on how PROMs could support interdisciplinary symptom management (i.e., integration of expertise to achieve common management goals). Participants described how the interrelatedness of symptoms was well suited to an integrated care approach and how PROMs enhanced communication and access to information across team members. In cases where symptoms persisted despite appropriate treatment, patients and clinicians explained how PROMs served as a tool to set realistic goals and reshape illness perception. Findings from this study suggest that access to resources, role flexibility, and established relationships within hemodialysis centres are important for sustaining PROM use in this setting. BackgroundPatient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standardized instruments used for assessing patients' perspectives on their health status at a point in time, including their health-related quality of life, symptoms, functionality, and physical, mental, and social wellbeing. For people with kidney failure receiving hemodialysis, addressing high symptom burden and complexity relies on care team members integrating their expertise to achieve common management goals. In the context of a program-wide initiative integrating PROMs into routine hemodialysis care, we aimed to explore patients' and clinicians' perspectives on the role of PROMs in supporting interdisciplinary symptom management.MethodsWe employed a qualitative descriptive approach using semi-structured interviews and observations. Eligible participants included adult patients receiving intermittent, outpatient hemodialysis for > 3 months, their informal caregivers, and hemodialysis clinicians (i.e., nurses, nephrologists, and allied health professionals) in Southern Alberta, Canada. Guided by thematic analysis, team members coded transcripts in duplicate and developed themes iteratively through review, refinement, and discussion.ResultsThirty-three clinicians (22 nurses, 6 nephrologists, 5 allied health professionals), 20 patients, and one caregiver participated in this study. Clinicians described using PROMs to coordinate care across provider types using the resources available in their units, whereas patients tended to focus on the perceived impact of this concerted care on symptom trajectory and care experience. We identified 3 overarching themes with subthemes related to the role of PROMs in interdisciplinary symptom management in this setting: (1) Integrating care for interrelated symptoms ("You need a team", conducive setting, role clarity and collaboration); (2) Streamlining information sharing and access (symptom data repository, common language for coordinated care); (3) Reshaping expectations (expectations for follow-up, managing symptom persistence).ConclusionsWe found that use of PROMs in routine hemodialysis care highlighted symptom interrelatedness and complexity and helped to streamline involvement of the interdisciplinary care team. Issues such as role flexibility and resource constraints may influence sustainability of routine PROM use in the outpatient hemodialysis setting.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Exploring patient reported quality of life in lung cancer patients: A qualitative study of patient-reported outcome measures
    Jensen-Marini, Elena
    Ayton, Darshini
    Zalcberg, John
    Stirling, Robert G.
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2025, 21 (02) : 163 - 173
  • [22] Perceptions of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Acute Care Pediatric Physical Therapy A Qualitative Analysis
    Tischler, Dana
    Pitney, William A.
    Wood, Janine
    Shotwell, Mary
    Mooney, Cade
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACUTE CARE PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2023, 14 (04) : 146 - 158
  • [23] Chiropractors’ views on the use of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: a qualitative study
    Michelle M. Holmes
    Felicity L. Bishop
    David Newell
    Jonathan Field
    George Lewith
    [J]. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 26
  • [24] A qualitative interview study to explore adolescents' experience of alopecia areata and the content validity of sign/symptom patient-reported outcome measures
    Macey, Jake
    Kitchen, Helen
    Aldhouse, Natalie V. J.
    Edson-Heredia, Emily
    Burge, Russel
    Prakash, Apurva
    King, Brett A.
    Mesinkovska, Natasha
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 186 (05) : 849 - 860
  • [25] Perceived benefits and limitations of using patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice with individual patients: a systematic review of qualitative studies
    Campbell, Rachel
    Ju, Angela
    King, Madeleine T.
    Rutherford, Claudia
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (06) : 1597 - 1620
  • [26] The Surgeon's Perceived Value of Patient-reported Outcome Measures (PROMs): An Exploratory Qualitative Study of 5 Different Surgical Subspecialties
    Mou, Danny
    Sisodia, Rachel C.
    Castillo-Angeles, Manuel
    Ladin, Keren
    Bergmark, Regan W.
    Pusic, Andrea L.
    del Carmen, Marcela G.
    Heng, Marilyn
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2022, 275 (03) : 500 - 505
  • [27] Surgeon’s experiences of receiving peer benchmarked feedback using patient-reported outcome measures: a qualitative study
    Maria B Boyce
    John P Browne
    Joanne Greenhalgh
    [J]. Implementation Science, 9
  • [28] A qualitative study to identify thematic areas for HIV related patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and patient-reported experience measures (PREM)
    Anna-Leena Lohiniva
    Sanna Isosomppi
    Sini Pasanen
    Jussi Sutinen
    [J]. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 7
  • [29] Barriers and Facilitators When Implementing Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures at a Municipal Cancer Care Unit A Qualitative Study
    Skare, Terese S.
    Midtbust, May Helen
    Lund, Jo-asmund
    Kaasa, Stein
    Dreyer, Anne
    [J]. CANCER NURSING, 2023, 46 (04) : E268 - E275
  • [30] A qualitative study of patients’ perceptions of the utility of patient-reported outcome measures of symptoms in primary care clinics
    Tasneem L. Talib
    Paige DeChant
    Jacob Kean
    Patrick O. Monahan
    David A. Haggstrom
    Madison E. Stout
    Kurt Kroenke
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2018, 27 : 3157 - 3166