On prediction of slope failure time with the inverse velocity method

被引:10
作者
Zhang, Jie [2 ]
Yao, Hong-zeng [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zi-peng [2 ,4 ]
Xue, Ya-dong [2 ]
Zhang, Lu-lu [3 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Key Lab Geotech & Underground Engn, Minist Educ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, Dept Geotech Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Tongji Univ, Dept Geotech Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Inverse velocity method; slope failure time; saddle point; condition number; PROGRESSIVE FAILURE; ACCELERATING CREEP; NEW-ZEALAND; LANDSLIDE; FORECAST; RUPTURE; MASSES;
D O I
10.1080/17499518.2022.2132263
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The inverse velocity (INV) method is widely used for predicting the slope failure time. When applying the INV method, the inverse velocity can be assumed to be a linear and non-linear function of time, respectively, which are called linear and non-linear INV methods in this paper, respectively. Very few guidance is available in the literatures on the use of the two types of INV methods. In this paper, the performances of the linear and non-linear INV methods are assessed using a landslide database with 55 case histories. It is found that, two types of pitfalls may be encountered when applying the non-linear INV method, i.e. the saddle point and the ill-conditioned Hessian matrix. For the landslides examined in this paper, the linear INV method is free from the two pitfalls. When these pitfalls are encountered, the failure time predicted based on the non-linear INV methods may be significantly different from the actual slope failure time. For the landslides examined in this paper, the linear INV method is not only more stable, but also more accurate than the non-linear INV method. It is suggested that the linear INV method should be preferred over the non-linear INV method in future applications.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 126
页数:13
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Generation of Near-Field Artificial Ground Motions Compatible with Median-Predicted Spectra Using PSO-Based Neural Network and Wavelet Analysis [J].
Amiri, G. Ghodrati ;
Rad, A. Abdolahi ;
Aghajari, S. ;
Hazaveh, N. Khanmohamadi .
COMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2012, 27 (09) :711-730
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1985, Landslides
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, POSITIVE FEEDBACK SE
[4]   Large reactivated landslides in weak rock masses: a case study from the Northern Apennines (Italy) [J].
Borgatti, L. ;
Corsini, A. ;
Barbieri, M. ;
Sartini, G. ;
Truffelli, G. ;
Caputo, G. ;
Puglisi, C. .
LANDSLIDES, 2006, 3 (02) :115-124
[5]  
Borsetto M., 1991, P 7 INT S LANDSL CHR, P335
[6]  
Brown D.E., 2014, HESSIAN MATRIX EIGEN
[7]   FINITE-ELEMENT STUDY OF THE NEVIS BLUFF (NEW-ZEALAND) ROCK SLOPE FAILURE [J].
BROWN, I ;
HITTINGER, M ;
GOODMAN, R .
ROCK MECHANICS, 1980, 12 (3-4) :231-245
[8]  
Cahill J, 2006, J S AFR I MIN METALL, V106, P471
[9]  
Carey JM, 2007, PROC MONOGR ENG WATE, P207
[10]   Guidelines on the use of inverse velocity method as a tool for setting alarm thresholds and forecasting landslides and structure collapses [J].
Carla, Tommaso ;
Intrieri, Emanuele ;
Di Traglia, Federico ;
Nolesini, Teresa ;
Gigli, Giovanni ;
Casagli, Nicola .
LANDSLIDES, 2017, 14 (02) :517-534