Diagnostic accuracy of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) to estimate disability after stroke

被引:3
作者
dos Santos, Heyriane Martins [1 ]
Pereira, Gabriela Santos [1 ]
de Oliveira, Leia Cordeiro [1 ]
da Silva, Paula Karina [1 ]
Lima, Michael Goncalves [1 ]
Alexandre de Amorim Feliz, Victor Hugo [1 ]
Coelho de Morais Faria, Christina Danielli [2 ]
Silva, Soraia Micaela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nove Julho UNINOVE, Postgrad Program Rehabil Sci, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais UFMG, Postgrad Program Rehabil Sci, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
Stroke; disability; accuracy; World Health Assessment Disability Schedule 2; 0; International Classification of Functioning; disability and health; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1080/09638288.2022.2080876
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose To analyze WHODAS 2.0's diagnostic capacity and accuracy in stroke survivors. Methods Cross-sectional methodological study, in which individuals with chronic stroke were evaluated. Disability was considered the outcome variable, being evaluated by WHODAS 2.0; the modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used as the parameter variable. Disability was categorized in two levels being: "No or mild disability" (mRS 0-2) and "Moderate to severe disability" (mRS 3-5). To identify the cutoff point, a Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed with a confidence interval (CI) of 95% and considering sensitivity and specificity. Results The cutoff point >39.62 proved acceptable for distinguishing individuals with moderate/severe disability from individuals with no or mild disability (<= 39.62 points), with 66.22% sensitivity, 72.41% specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) of 45.45%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 84.74%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.747 (CI 95%: 0.65-0.83; p < 0.001). Conclusion WHODAS 2.0 demonstrated acceptable diagnostic capacity and the cutoff point of 39.62 proved suitable for distinguishing individuals with moderate/severe disability from those with no or mild disability after stroke.
引用
收藏
页码:2169 / 2174
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[21]   WHODAS II with people after stroke and their relatives [J].
Schlote, A. ;
Richter, M. ;
Wunderlich, M. T. ;
Poppendick, U. ;
Moeller, C. ;
Schwelm, K. ;
Wallesch, C. W. .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2009, 31 (11) :855-864
[22]  
Tarvonen-schr, 2021, RES REPORTS MED, V3, P1
[23]   THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION DISABILITY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE (WHODAS 2.0) AND THE WHO MINIMAL GENERIC SET OF DOMAINS OF FUNCTIONING AND HEALTH VERSUS CONVENTIONAL INSTRUMENTS IN SUBACUTE STROKE [J].
Tarvonen-Schroder, Sinikka ;
Hurme, Saija ;
Laimi, Katri .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2019, 51 (09) :675-682
[24]   Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 [J].
Uestuen, T. Bedirhan ;
Chatterji, Somnath ;
Kostanjsek, Nenad ;
Rehm, Juergen ;
Kennedy, Cille ;
Epping-Jordan, Joanne ;
Saxena, Shekhar ;
von Korff, Michael ;
Pull, Charles .
BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2010, 88 (11) :815-823
[25]  
Under TA., ROC CURVE ANAL