Diagnostic accuracy of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) to estimate disability after stroke

被引:3
作者
dos Santos, Heyriane Martins [1 ]
Pereira, Gabriela Santos [1 ]
de Oliveira, Leia Cordeiro [1 ]
da Silva, Paula Karina [1 ]
Lima, Michael Goncalves [1 ]
Alexandre de Amorim Feliz, Victor Hugo [1 ]
Coelho de Morais Faria, Christina Danielli [2 ]
Silva, Soraia Micaela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nove Julho UNINOVE, Postgrad Program Rehabil Sci, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais UFMG, Postgrad Program Rehabil Sci, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
Stroke; disability; accuracy; World Health Assessment Disability Schedule 2; 0; International Classification of Functioning; disability and health; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1080/09638288.2022.2080876
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose To analyze WHODAS 2.0's diagnostic capacity and accuracy in stroke survivors. Methods Cross-sectional methodological study, in which individuals with chronic stroke were evaluated. Disability was considered the outcome variable, being evaluated by WHODAS 2.0; the modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used as the parameter variable. Disability was categorized in two levels being: "No or mild disability" (mRS 0-2) and "Moderate to severe disability" (mRS 3-5). To identify the cutoff point, a Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed with a confidence interval (CI) of 95% and considering sensitivity and specificity. Results The cutoff point >39.62 proved acceptable for distinguishing individuals with moderate/severe disability from individuals with no or mild disability (<= 39.62 points), with 66.22% sensitivity, 72.41% specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) of 45.45%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 84.74%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.747 (CI 95%: 0.65-0.83; p < 0.001). Conclusion WHODAS 2.0 demonstrated acceptable diagnostic capacity and the cutoff point of 39.62 proved suitable for distinguishing individuals with moderate/severe disability from those with no or mild disability after stroke.
引用
收藏
页码:2169 / 2174
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Arowoiya AI, 2017, SOUTH AFR J PHYSIOTH, V73, DOI 10.4102/sajp.v73i1.343
[2]   THE MINI-MENTAL-STATE-EXAMINATION IN AN OUTPATIENT POPULATION - INFLUENCE OF LITERACY [J].
BERTOLUCCI, PHF ;
BRUCKI, SMD ;
CAMPACCI, SR ;
JULIANO, Y .
ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 1994, 52 (01) :1-7
[3]  
Bossuyt PM, 2015, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V351, DOI [10.1136/bmj.h5527, 10.1373/clinchem.2015.246280, 10.1148/radiol.2015151516]
[4]  
Castro S, 2019, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V35, DOI [10.1590/0102-311x00000519, 10.1590/0102-311X00000519]
[5]   What is the most appropriate way to analyse the WHODAS 2.0 score? [J].
Castro, Shamyr S. ;
Ferreira, Anderson Fuentes ;
Sampaio, Edgar G. M. ;
Araujo, Camilla M. ;
Dantas, Thaissa H. M. ;
Dantas, Diego de Sousa .
PHYSIOTHERAPY PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2021, 42 (01) :35-41
[6]  
Castro Shamyr Sulyvan, 2017, Fisioter. Pesqui., V24, P385, DOI 10.1590/1809-2950/17118724042017
[7]  
Dancey C. P., 2006, Estatistica sem Matematica para Psicologia: Usando SPSS para Windows
[8]   Reliability of neurological assessment scales in patients with stroke [J].
de caneda, Marco Aurelio Gralha ;
Fernandes, Jefferson Gomes ;
de Almeida, Andrea Garcia ;
Mugnol, Fabiana Eloisa .
ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2006, 64 (3A) :690-697
[9]   THE CLINICAL MEANING OF RANKIN HANDICAP GRADES AFTER STROKE [J].
DEHAAN, R ;
LIMBURG, M ;
BOSSUYT, P ;
VANDERMEULEN, J ;
AARONSON, N .
STROKE, 1995, 26 (11) :2027-2030
[10]   World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: An international systematic review [J].
Federici, Stefano ;
Bracalenti, Marco ;
Meloni, Fabio ;
Luciano, Juan V. .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 39 (23) :2347-2380