Diagnostic accuracy of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) to estimate disability after stroke

被引:3
作者
dos Santos, Heyriane Martins [1 ]
Pereira, Gabriela Santos [1 ]
de Oliveira, Leia Cordeiro [1 ]
da Silva, Paula Karina [1 ]
Lima, Michael Goncalves [1 ]
Alexandre de Amorim Feliz, Victor Hugo [1 ]
Coelho de Morais Faria, Christina Danielli [2 ]
Silva, Soraia Micaela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nove Julho UNINOVE, Postgrad Program Rehabil Sci, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais UFMG, Postgrad Program Rehabil Sci, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
Stroke; disability; accuracy; World Health Assessment Disability Schedule 2; 0; International Classification of Functioning; disability and health; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1080/09638288.2022.2080876
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose To analyze WHODAS 2.0's diagnostic capacity and accuracy in stroke survivors. Methods Cross-sectional methodological study, in which individuals with chronic stroke were evaluated. Disability was considered the outcome variable, being evaluated by WHODAS 2.0; the modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used as the parameter variable. Disability was categorized in two levels being: "No or mild disability" (mRS 0-2) and "Moderate to severe disability" (mRS 3-5). To identify the cutoff point, a Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed with a confidence interval (CI) of 95% and considering sensitivity and specificity. Results The cutoff point >39.62 proved acceptable for distinguishing individuals with moderate/severe disability from individuals with no or mild disability (<= 39.62 points), with 66.22% sensitivity, 72.41% specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) of 45.45%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 84.74%. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.747 (CI 95%: 0.65-0.83; p < 0.001). Conclusion WHODAS 2.0 demonstrated acceptable diagnostic capacity and the cutoff point of 39.62 proved suitable for distinguishing individuals with moderate/severe disability from those with no or mild disability after stroke.
引用
收藏
页码:2169 / 2174
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2004, Rev Bras Neurol
  • [2] Arowoiya AI, 2017, SOUTH AFR J PHYSIOTH, V73, DOI 10.4102/sajp.v73i1.343
  • [3] THE MINI-MENTAL-STATE-EXAMINATION IN AN OUTPATIENT POPULATION - INFLUENCE OF LITERACY
    BERTOLUCCI, PHF
    BRUCKI, SMD
    CAMPACCI, SR
    JULIANO, Y
    [J]. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 1994, 52 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [4] Bossuyt PM, 2015, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V351, DOI [10.1136/bmj.h5527, 10.1373/clinchem.2015.246280, 10.1148/radiol.2015151516]
  • [5] Castro S, 2019, CAD SAUDE PUBLICA, V35, DOI [10.1590/0102-311x00000519, 10.1590/0102-311X00000519]
  • [6] What is the most appropriate way to analyse the WHODAS 2.0 score?
    Castro, Shamyr S.
    Ferreira, Anderson Fuentes
    Sampaio, Edgar G. M.
    Araujo, Camilla M.
    Dantas, Thaissa H. M.
    Dantas, Diego de Sousa
    [J]. PHYSIOTHERAPY PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2021, 42 (01) : 35 - 41
  • [7] Castro Shamyr Sulyvan, 2017, Fisioter. Pesqui., V24, P385, DOI 10.1590/1809-2950/17118724042017
  • [8] Dancey C., 2006, ESTATISTICA SEM MATE
  • [9] Reliability of neurological assessment scales in patients with stroke
    de caneda, Marco Aurelio Gralha
    Fernandes, Jefferson Gomes
    de Almeida, Andrea Garcia
    Mugnol, Fabiana Eloisa
    [J]. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2006, 64 (3A) : 690 - 697
  • [10] THE CLINICAL MEANING OF RANKIN HANDICAP GRADES AFTER STROKE
    DEHAAN, R
    LIMBURG, M
    BOSSUYT, P
    VANDERMEULEN, J
    AARONSON, N
    [J]. STROKE, 1995, 26 (11) : 2027 - 2030