Unchaining supply chains: Transformative leaps toward regenerating social-ecological systems

被引:24
|
作者
Gualandris, Jury [1 ]
Branzei, Oana [1 ]
Wilhelm, Miriam [2 ]
Lazzarini, Sergio [1 ,3 ]
Linnenluecke, Martina [4 ]
Hamann, Ralph [5 ]
Dooley, Kevin J. [6 ]
Barnett, Michael L. [7 ]
Chen, Chien-Ming [8 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Ivey Business Sch, London, ON, Canada
[2] Vienna Univ Econ & Business, Vienna, Austria
[3] Insper Inst Educ & Res, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Technol Sydney, UTS Business Sch, Ctr Climate Risk & Resilience, Sydney, Australia
[5] Univ Cape Town, UCT Grad Sch Business, Cape Town, South Africa
[6] Arizona State Univ, W P Carey Sch Business, Tempe, AZ USA
[7] Rutgers State Univ, Rutgers Business Sch, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[8] Nanyang Technol Univ, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
adaptation; climate change; coordination; degeneration; regeneration; research methods; resilience; stakeholder governance; supply chain management; GOVERNANCE; FIRM; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; RETAILERS;
D O I
10.1111/jscm.12314
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The worsening climate, biodiversity, and inequity crises have existential implications. To help resolve these crises, supply chains must move beyond a minimal harm approach. Instead, supply chains must make positive contributions to and harmoniously integrate with the living systems around them. Despite agreement on this urgent need, supply chain management research still lacks a shared roadmap for establishing economically sustainable supply chains that actively regenerate social-ecological systems. This essay deepens the understanding of regenerative supply chains, inviting supply chain scholars and practitioners to rally around timely questions and codevelop new answers. We first scrutinize the paradigmatic assumptions that continue to anchor contemporary research and practice in supply chain management, showing how these once helpful assumptions now hold the community back from seeking much needed solutions. We then offer real-world examples and synthesize emerging arguments from multiple disciplines to propose three new principles of regenerative organizing: proportionality, reciprocity, and poly-rhythmicity. We also delve into the implications of pursuing these regenerative principles for supply chain coordination, governance, and resilience. Finally, we reflect on the fit of empirical research designs and methods for examining the creation of new regenerative supply chains and the conversion of existing supply chains.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 67
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Theory of Transformative Agency in Linked Social-Ecological Systems
    Westley, Frances R.
    Tjornbo, Ola
    Schultz, Lisen
    Olsson, Per
    Folke, Carl
    Crona, Beatrice
    Bodin, Orjan
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (03):
  • [2] Separating Adaptive Maintenance (Resilience) and Transformative Capacity of Social-Ecological Systems
    Wilson, Samuel
    Pearson, Leonie J.
    Kashima, Yoshihisa
    Lusher, Dean
    Pearson, Craig
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (01):
  • [3] The importance of cross-scale social relationships for dealing with social-ecological change in agricultural supply chains
    Gonzalez-Mon, Blanca
    Mancilla-Garcia, Maria
    Bodin, Orjan
    Malherbe, Willem
    Sitas, Nadia
    Pringle, Catherine B.
    Biggs, Reinette
    Schluter, Maja
    JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2024, 105
  • [4] Transformative adaptation to climate change for sustainable social-ecological systems
    Fedele, Giacomo
    Donatti, Camila I.
    Harvey, Celia A.
    Hannah, Lee
    Hole, David G.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2019, 101 : 116 - 125
  • [5] The social structural foundations of adaptation and transformation in social-ecological systems
    Barnes, Michele L.
    Bodin, Orjan
    Guerrero, Angela M.
    McAllister, Ryan R. J.
    Alexander, Steven M.
    Robins, Garry
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2017, 22 (04):
  • [6] Social networks and transformative behaviours in a grassland social-ecological system
    Nesbitt, Holly K.
    Metcalf, Alexander L.
    Floyd, Theresa M.
    Uden, Daniel R.
    Chaffin, Brian C.
    Gulab, Sabrina
    Banerjee, Simanti
    Vallury, Sechindra
    Hamlin, Samantha L.
    Metcalf, Elizabeth Covelli
    Fogarty, Dillon T.
    Twidwell, Dirac
    Allen, Craig R.
    PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2024, 6 (05) : 1877 - 1892
  • [7] Studying the complexity of change: toward an analytical framework for understanding deliberate social-ecological transformations
    Moore, Michele-Lee
    Tjornbo, Ola
    Enfors, Elin
    Knapp, Corrie
    Hodbod, Jennifer
    Baggio, Jacopo A.
    Norstrom, Albert
    Olsson, Per
    Biggs, Duan
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2014, 19 (04):
  • [8] Evaluating Linked Social-Ecological Systems in Marine Protected Areas
    Lopez-Angarita, Juliana
    Moreno-Sanchez, Rocio
    Higinio Maldonado, Jorge
    Sanchez, Juan A.
    CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2014, 7 (03): : 241 - 252
  • [9] Toward comparative institutional analysis of polycentric social-ecological systems governance
    Thiel, Andreas
    Moser, Christine
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2018, 28 (04) : 269 - 283
  • [10] Governance of food systems across scales in times of social-ecological change: a review of indicators
    Delaney, Aogan
    Evans, Tom
    McGreevy, John
    Blekking, Jordan
    Schlachter, Tyler
    Korhonen-Kurki, Kaisa
    Tamas, Peter A.
    Crane, Todd A.
    Eakin, Hallie
    Forch, Wiebke
    Jones, Lindsey
    Nelson, Donald R.
    Oberlack, Christoph
    Purdon, Mark
    Rist, Stephan
    FOOD SECURITY, 2018, 10 (02) : 287 - 310