First 100 cases of transvesical single-port robotic radical prostatectomy

被引:10
|
作者
Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana [1 ]
Ferguson, Ethan L. [1 ]
Chavali, Jaya S. [1 ]
Geskin, Albert [1 ]
Kaouk, Jihad [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic-assisted surgery; Single-port; Minimally-invasive surgery;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajur.2022.12.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe the surgical technique and report the early outcomes of the transvesical (TV) approach to single-port (SP) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Methods: All procedures were performed at a single center by one surgeon. We identified the first 100 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer that underwent SP TV robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the da Vinci SP robotic surgical system. Data were collected prospectively and analyzed with descriptive statistics. The primary outcomes assessed were postoperative urinary continence, rate of biochemical recurrence, and sexual function.Results: All procedures were performed without extra ports or conversion. The median age was 62.1 years and 49.0% of the patients had abdominal surgery history. The preoperative median prostate-specific antigen value and prostate volume were 5.0 ng/mL and 33.0 mL, respectively. There were no intraoperative complications. The median operative time and estimated blood loss were 212.5 min and 100.0 mL, respectively. A total of 92.0% of patients were discharged within 24.0 h, with an overall median length of stay of 5.6 h. Only 4.0% of patients required opioid prescriptions at discharge. The median Foley catheter duration was 3 days. Positive margins were present in 15.0% of cases. Median follow-up was 10.4 months. Continence rate was immediate after Foley removal in 49.0% of cases, 65.0% at 2 weeks, 77.4% at 6 weeks, 94.1% at 6 months, and 98.9% at 1 year. One case of biochemical recurrence (1.0%) was noted 3 months after surgery. Conclusion: The SP TV approach for radical prostatectomy cases is a safe and feasible technique for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. This technique offers advantages of short hospital stay, minimal narcotic use postoperatively, and promising early return of urinary continence, without compromising oncologic outcomes. 2023 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 422
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robotic perineal radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection using a purpose-built single-port robotic platform
    Ramirez, Daniel
    Maurice, Matthew J.
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 118 (05) : 829 - 833
  • [42] Perioperative results of single-port vs multi-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via peritoneal approach: a meta-analysis
    Zongying Lv
    Guiyuan Chen
    Yugen Li
    Junyang Li
    Anneng Hu
    Xiaodong Yu
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 17 : 1309 - 1318
  • [43] Perioperative results of single-port vs multi-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy via peritoneal approach: a meta-analysis
    Lv, Zongying
    Chen, Guiyuan
    Li, Yugen
    Li, Junyang
    Hu, Anneng
    Yu, Xiaodong
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (04) : 1309 - 1318
  • [44] Single-port and multiport robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A meta-analysis
    Nguyen, Tuan Thanh
    Dobbs, Ryan W.
    Vuong, Huy Gia
    Quy, Khoa
    Ngo, Hanh Thi Tuyet
    Mai, Anh Tuan
    Tuyet, Mai Tran Thi
    Thai, Minh Sam
    Tiong, Ho Yee
    Choi, Se Young
    Shahait, Mohammed
    Lee, David I.
    PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 11 (04) : 187 - 194
  • [45] Robot-assisted single-port radical prostatectomy: A phase 1 clinical study
    Ng, Chi-Fai
    Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun
    Chiu, Peter Ka-Fung
    Yee, Chi-Hang
    Chan, Chi-Kwok
    Hou, Simon See-Ming
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Chan, Eddie Shu-Yin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 (09) : 878 - 883
  • [46] Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Where Do We Stand?
    Franco, Antonio
    Pellegrino, Antony A.
    De Nunzio, Cosimo
    Salkowski, Morgan
    Jackson, Jamal C.
    Zukowski, Lucas B.
    Checcucci, Enrico
    Vourganti, Srinivas
    Chow, Alexander K.
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Crivellaro, Simone
    Autorino, Riccardo
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (04) : 4301 - 4310
  • [47] GASLESS ROBOTIC PERINEAL RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: EXPERIENCE OF THE FIRST 12 CASES
    Tasci, Ali Ihsan
    Simsek, Abdulmuttalip
    Sam, Emre
    Seker, Kamil Gokhan
    Atar, Feyzi Arda
    Sahin, Selcuk
    Tugcu, Volkan
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2020, 73 (03): : 236 - 241
  • [48] Transperineal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with Si da Vinci surgical system: initial experience and description of technique
    Ni, Kangxin
    Xue, Dingwei
    Li, Gonghui
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 10 (11) : 4694 - 4701
  • [49] Comparison of outcomes between single-port and multi-port robotic radical nephrectomy
    Okhawere, Kennedy E.
    Razdan, Shirin
    Bamby, Jewel
    Saini, Indu
    Zuluaga, Laura
    Sauer, Ruben Calvo
    Soputro, Nicolas
    Eun, Daniel D.
    Bhandari, Akshay
    Hemal, Ashok K.
    Porter, James
    Abaza, Ronney
    Mansour, Ahmed
    Ahmed, Mutahar
    Crivellaro, Simone
    Pierorazio, Phillip M.
    Singla, Nirmish
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Stifelman, Michael D.
    Badani, Ketan K.
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [50] Super-veil nerve-sparing extraperitoneal pure single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy on da Vinci Si robotic system
    Chang, Yifan
    Xu, Weidong
    Xiao, Yutian
    Wang, Ye
    Yan, Shi
    Ren, Shancheng
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (06) : 1413 - 1418