First 100 cases of transvesical single-port robotic radical prostatectomy

被引:10
|
作者
Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana [1 ]
Ferguson, Ethan L. [1 ]
Chavali, Jaya S. [1 ]
Geskin, Albert [1 ]
Kaouk, Jihad [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Glickman Urol & Kidney Inst, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic-assisted surgery; Single-port; Minimally-invasive surgery;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajur.2022.12.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe the surgical technique and report the early outcomes of the transvesical (TV) approach to single-port (SP) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Methods: All procedures were performed at a single center by one surgeon. We identified the first 100 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer that underwent SP TV robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using the da Vinci SP robotic surgical system. Data were collected prospectively and analyzed with descriptive statistics. The primary outcomes assessed were postoperative urinary continence, rate of biochemical recurrence, and sexual function.Results: All procedures were performed without extra ports or conversion. The median age was 62.1 years and 49.0% of the patients had abdominal surgery history. The preoperative median prostate-specific antigen value and prostate volume were 5.0 ng/mL and 33.0 mL, respectively. There were no intraoperative complications. The median operative time and estimated blood loss were 212.5 min and 100.0 mL, respectively. A total of 92.0% of patients were discharged within 24.0 h, with an overall median length of stay of 5.6 h. Only 4.0% of patients required opioid prescriptions at discharge. The median Foley catheter duration was 3 days. Positive margins were present in 15.0% of cases. Median follow-up was 10.4 months. Continence rate was immediate after Foley removal in 49.0% of cases, 65.0% at 2 weeks, 77.4% at 6 weeks, 94.1% at 6 months, and 98.9% at 1 year. One case of biochemical recurrence (1.0%) was noted 3 months after surgery. Conclusion: The SP TV approach for radical prostatectomy cases is a safe and feasible technique for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. This technique offers advantages of short hospital stay, minimal narcotic use postoperatively, and promising early return of urinary continence, without compromising oncologic outcomes. 2023 Editorial Office of Asian Journal of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 422
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Upper urinary tract surgery and radical prostatectomy with Senhance(R) robotic system: Single center experience-First 100 cases
    Kastelan, Zeljko
    Hudolin, Tvrtko
    Kulis, Tomislav
    Knezevic, Nikola
    Penezic, Luka
    Maric, Marjan
    Zekulic, Toni
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2021, 17 (04)
  • [32] Single-institution Cost Comparison: Single-port Versus Multiport Robotic Prostatectomy
    Lenfant, Louis
    Sawczyn, Guilherme
    Kim, Soodong
    Aminsharifi, Alireza
    Kaouk, Jihad
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (03): : 532 - 536
  • [33] Single-port robotic subcostal major pulmonary resection using the single-port robotic system
    Lee, Jun Hee
    Hong, Jeong In
    Kim, Hyun Koo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 48 (03) : 713 - 722
  • [34] Complications of single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: multi-institutional analysis from the Single-Port Advanced Research Consortium (SPARC)
    Soputro, Nicolas A.
    Chavali, Jaya Sai
    Ferguson, Ethan L.
    Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana
    Calvo, Ruben Sauer
    Nguyen, Jennifer
    Moschovas, Marcio C.
    Wilder, Samantha
    Okhawere, Kennedy
    de la Rosa, Ruth Sanchez
    Saini, Indu
    Peabody, James
    Badani, Ketan K.
    Rogers, Craig
    Joseph, Jean
    Nix, Jeffrey
    Patel, Vipul
    Stifelman, Michael
    Ahmed, Mutahar
    Crivellaro, Simone
    Kim, Moses
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 134 (01) : 54 - 62
  • [35] Minimally invasive cytoreductive radical prostatectomy, exploring the safety and feasibility of a single-port or multi-port robotic platform
    Daniel J. Lama
    Kyle Thomas
    Simone L. Vernez
    Oluwatimilehin Okunowo
    Clayton S. Lau
    Bertram E. Yuh
    BMC Urology, 24
  • [36] Extraperitoneal Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Khalil, Mahmoud I.
    Joseph, Jean V.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2021, 35 : S100 - S105
  • [37] Minimally invasive cytoreductive radical prostatectomy, exploring the safety and feasibility of a single-port or multi-port robotic platform
    Lama, Daniel J.
    Thomas, Kyle
    Vernez, Simone L.
    Okunowo, Oluwatimilehin
    Lau, Clayton S.
    Yuh, Bertram E.
    BMC UROLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [38] Single port robotic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review
    Lai, Andrew
    Dobbs, Ryan W.
    Talamini, Susan
    Halgrimson, Whitney R.
    Wilson, Jessica O.
    Vigneswaran, Hari T.
    Crivellaro, Simone
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (02) : 898 - 905
  • [39] Single-port Transvesical Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes
    Ramos, Roxana
    Ferguson, Ethan
    Abou Zeinab, Mahmoud
    Soputro, Nicolas
    Chavali, Jaya S.
    Pedraza, Adriana M.
    Schwen, Zeyad
    Mikesell, Carter
    Kaouk, Jihad
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 (05) : 445 - 456
  • [40] Single-Port versus Multiple-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Fahmy, Omar
    Fahmy, Usama A.
    Alhakamy, Nabil A.
    Khairul-Asri, Mohd Ghani
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (24)