Probabilistic forecast of nonlinear dynamical systems with uncertainty quantification

被引:4
|
作者
Gu, Mengyang [1 ]
Lin, Yizi [1 ]
Lee, Victor Chang [2 ]
Qiu, Diana Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Stat & Appl Probabil, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Dept Mech Engn & Mat Sci, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Bayesian prior; Generative models; Dynamic mode decomposition; Forecast; Gaussian processes; Uncertainty quantification; GAUSSIAN STOCHASTIC-PROCESS; MODE DECOMPOSITION; BAYESIAN-ANALYSIS; PROCESS EMULATION; KOOPMAN OPERATOR; COMPUTER-MODELS; QUASI-PARTICLE; CALIBRATION; IDENTIFICATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.physd.2023.133938
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Data-driven modeling is useful for reconstructing nonlinear dynamical systems when the underlying process is unknown or too expensive to compute. Having reliable uncertainty assessment of the forecast enables tools to be deployed to predict new scenarios unobserved before. In this work, we first extend parallel partial Gaussian processes for predicting the vector-valued transition function that links the observations between the current and next time points, and quantify the uncertainty of predictions by posterior sampling. Second, we show the equivalence between the dynamic mode decomposition and the maximum likelihood estimator of the linear mapping matrix in the linear state space model. The connection provides a probabilistic generative model of dynamic mode decomposition and thus, uncertainty of predictions can be obtained. Furthermore, we draw close connections between different data-driven models for approximating nonlinear dynamics, through a unified view of generative models. We study two numerical examples, where the inputs of the dynamics are assumed to be known in the first example and the inputs are unknown in the second example. The examples indicate that uncertainty of forecast can be properly quantified, whereas model or input misspecification can degrade the accuracy of uncertainty quantification.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] On the effectiveness of Monte Carlo for initial uncertainty forecasting in nonlinear dynamical systems
    Yang, Chao
    Kumar, Mrinal
    AUTOMATICA, 2018, 87 : 301 - 309
  • [32] Uncertainty Quantification in Nonlinear MEMS
    Goyal, R.
    Bajaj, A. K.
    PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NOISE AND VIBRATION ENGINEERING (ISMA2012) / INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNCERTAINTY IN STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS (USD2012), 2012, : 4575 - 4589
  • [33] Probabilistic Inference for Dynamical Systems
    Davis, Sergio
    Gonzalez, Diego
    Gutierrez, Gonzalo
    ENTROPY, 2018, 20 (09)
  • [34] Dynamical probabilistic P systems
    Pescini, D
    Besozzi, D
    Mauri, G
    Zandron, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (01) : 183 - 204
  • [35] Probabilistic modelling for the quantification of uncertainty in fracture data
    Windle, PL
    Moskovic, R
    ECF 11 - MECHANISMS AND MECHANICS OF DAMAGE AND FAILURE, VOLS I-III, 1996, : 2157 - 2162
  • [36] A probabilistic approach to uncertainty quantification with limited information
    Red-Horse, JR
    Benjamin, AS
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2004, 85 (1-3) : 183 - 190
  • [37] Uncertainty quantification by probabilistic analysis of circular fins
    Gorla, Rama Subba Reddy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TURBO & JET-ENGINES, 2024, 41 (02) : 307 - 316
  • [38] Probabilistic density function method for nonlinear dynamical systems driven by colored noise
    Barajas-Solano, David A.
    Tartakovsky, Alexandre M.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2016, 93 (05)
  • [39] Application of the Uncertainty Quantification in railway dynamical problems
    Anwendung der Uncertainty Quantification bei eisenbahndynamischen problemen
    Bigoni, D. (dabi@dtu.dk), 1600, Georg Siemens Verlag GmbH and Co. KG (137): : 152 - 158
  • [40] Evaluation of machine learning techniques for forecast uncertainty quantification
    Sacco, Maximiliano A.
    Ruiz, Juan J.
    Pulido, Manuel
    Tandeo, Pierre
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2022, 148 (749) : 3470 - 3490