Reliability and Validity Testing of the Caregiver- Centered Communication Questionnaire

被引:5
|
作者
Demiris, George [1 ]
Pitzer, Kyle [2 ]
Washington, Karla [2 ]
Oliver, Debra Parker [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Fagin Hall,418 Curie Blvd,Rm 324, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Washington Univ St Louis, Mid Campus Ctr, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
communication; family caregiving; validity; reliability; survey; psychometric test; FAMILY; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1891/JNM-2022-0044
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study is to test the reliability and construct validity of a new instrument, the Caregiver -Centered Communication Questionnaire (CCCQ), designed to assess the extent to which family caregivers feel their perspectives and needs are appropriately acknowledged and addressed by the healthcare team. Methods: We adminis-tered the CCCQ to adult family caregivers of hospice patients. We calculated Cronbach's alpha and performed struc-tural equation modeling. Following the estimation of the congeneric model, modification indices (MI) were examined to establish cross-loading. We used RMSEA, CFI and TLI, and SRMR to determine the quality of model fit. Results: A total of 525 caregivers completed the CCCQ instrument. The Cronbach's alpha was alpha = 0.98, indicating good reliabil-ity. Our final model demonstrated good fit to our data, chi 2(354) = 711.653, RMSEA = 0.044(0.039, 0.049), CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.99, SRMR = 0.029. Conclusion: Caregivers are asked to play an ever-increasing role in managing aspects of care. This role is not fully reflected in available toolkits to assess processes of care, and the CCCQ, designed to address this gap, was found to be reliable and valid. Assessing caregiver centered communication should and can be integrated into the evaluation of health care services delivered to patients and families.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 447
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Emotional Abuse Questionnaire: a validity and reliability study
    Celik, Melike Yavas
    Elmaoglu, Erhan
    SOCIAL WORK IN HEALTH CARE, 2022, : 483 - 498
  • [32] Reliability and validity of the Satisfaction with Hospital Care Questionnaire
    Hendriks, AAJ
    Oort, FJ
    Vrielink, MR
    Smets, EMA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 14 (06) : 471 - 482
  • [33] The multidimensional relationship questionnaire:: A study of reliability and validity
    Büyüksahin, A
    TURK PSIKIYATRI DERGISI, 2005, 16 (02) : 97 - 105
  • [34] Caregiver burden in cerebral palsy: Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of caregiver difficulties scale
    Atar, Emel
    Dilekci, Erdal
    Unubol, Tugba Ozsoy
    Gunduz, Nermin
    Atar, Murat
    Askin, Ayhan
    CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 48 (03) : 465 - 473
  • [35] Validity and Reliability of the Home Enteral Nutrition Caregiver Task Checklist
    Ceren, Rana Elcin Sezer
    Talas, Melek Serpil
    Goksuluk, Dincer
    TOPICS IN CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2021, 36 (03) : 242 - 251
  • [36] Turkish validity and reliability study of the person-centered perioperative nursing scale
    Albayram, Tugba
    Guner, Sukriye Ilkay
    PERIOPERATIVE CARE AND OPERATING ROOM MANAGEMENT, 2025, 38
  • [37] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview
    Ari, Y
    Kudo, K
    Hosokawa, T
    Washio, M
    Miura, H
    Hisamichi, S
    PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 1997, 51 (05) : 281 - 287
  • [38] Psychometric and Logometric Properties of the Armenian Version of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Assessment Questionnaire: Assessing Reliability and Validity
    Tigran R. Petrosyan
    Armenuhi V. Avagyan
    Anush A. Petrosyan
    Tatev V. Margaryan
    Hasmik H. Mkrtchyan
    Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2022, 51 : 135 - 150
  • [39] Psychometric and Logometric Properties of the Armenian Version of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Assessment Questionnaire: Assessing Reliability and Validity
    Petrosyan, Tigran R.
    Avagyan, Armenuhi, V
    Petrosyan, Anush A.
    Margaryan, Tatev, V
    Mkrtchyan, Hasmik H.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2022, 51 (01) : 135 - 150
  • [40] A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability
    DeVon, Holli A.
    Block, Michelle E.
    Moyle-Wright, Patricia
    Ernst, Diane M.
    Hayden, Susan J.
    Lazzara, Deborah J.
    Savoy, Suzanne M.
    Kostas-Polston, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2007, 39 (02) : 155 - 164