Reliability and Validity Testing of the Caregiver- Centered Communication Questionnaire

被引:5
|
作者
Demiris, George [1 ]
Pitzer, Kyle [2 ]
Washington, Karla [2 ]
Oliver, Debra Parker [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Fagin Hall,418 Curie Blvd,Rm 324, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Washington Univ St Louis, Mid Campus Ctr, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
communication; family caregiving; validity; reliability; survey; psychometric test; FAMILY; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1891/JNM-2022-0044
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study is to test the reliability and construct validity of a new instrument, the Caregiver -Centered Communication Questionnaire (CCCQ), designed to assess the extent to which family caregivers feel their perspectives and needs are appropriately acknowledged and addressed by the healthcare team. Methods: We adminis-tered the CCCQ to adult family caregivers of hospice patients. We calculated Cronbach's alpha and performed struc-tural equation modeling. Following the estimation of the congeneric model, modification indices (MI) were examined to establish cross-loading. We used RMSEA, CFI and TLI, and SRMR to determine the quality of model fit. Results: A total of 525 caregivers completed the CCCQ instrument. The Cronbach's alpha was alpha = 0.98, indicating good reliabil-ity. Our final model demonstrated good fit to our data, chi 2(354) = 711.653, RMSEA = 0.044(0.039, 0.049), CFI = 0.99, TLI = 0.99, SRMR = 0.029. Conclusion: Caregivers are asked to play an ever-increasing role in managing aspects of care. This role is not fully reflected in available toolkits to assess processes of care, and the CCCQ, designed to address this gap, was found to be reliable and valid. Assessing caregiver centered communication should and can be integrated into the evaluation of health care services delivered to patients and families.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 447
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Design and Preliminary Testing of the Caregiver-Centered Communication Questionnaire (CCCQ)
    Demiris, George
    Ganz, Freda DeKeyser
    Han, Claire J.
    Pike, Kenneth
    Oliver, Debra Parker
    Washington, Karla
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2020, 35 (03) : 154 - 160
  • [2] Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Iranian caregiver burden questionnaire for heart failure
    Hamediseresht, Marjohn
    Khalili, Yasaman
    Asghari, Raana
    Taghavi, Sepideh
    Amin, Ahmad
    Naderi, Nasim
    RESEARCH IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (02) : 35 - 41
  • [3] The Reliability and Validity of the Korean Edition of the CSBS DP Caregiver Questionnaire
    Lee, Yoonkyoung
    Choi, Jieun
    Lee, HyoJoo
    COMMUNICATION SCIENCES AND DISORDERS-CSD, 2021, 26 (01): : 22 - 33
  • [4] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of caregiver self-assessment questionnaire
    Askin, Ayhan
    Atar, Emel
    Sengul, Ilker
    Tosun, Aliye
    Demirdal, Umit
    Elmali, Ferhan
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 42 (22) : 3250 - 3255
  • [5] The validity and reliability of the simplified Chinese version of the Social Communication Questionnaire
    Liu, Si-Yu
    Wang, Xin
    Chen, Qiang
    Chen, Jia-Jie
    Jin, Cheng-Kai
    Zhan, Xiao-Ling
    Guo, Cui-Hua
    Li, Xiu-Hong
    Lin, Li-Zi
    Jing, Jin
    AUTISM RESEARCH, 2022, 15 (09) : 1732 - 1741
  • [6] The communication patterns questionnaire: The reliability and validity of a constructive communication subscale
    Heavey, CL
    Larson, BM
    Zumtobel, DC
    Christensen, A
    JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1996, 58 (03): : 796 - 800
  • [7] Validity and reliability testing of the Swedish version of Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire
    Isaksson, Ulf
    Hajdarevic, Senada
    Jutterstrom, Lena
    Hornsten, Asa
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2014, 28 (02) : 405 - 412
  • [8] The Japanese version of the questionnaire about the process of recovery: development and validity and reliability testing
    Kanehara, Akiko
    Kotake, Risa
    Miyamoto, Yuki
    Kumakura, Yousuke
    Morita, Kentaro
    Ishiura, Tomoko
    Shimizu, Kimiko
    Fujieda, Yumiko
    Ando, Shuntaro
    Kondo, Shinsuke
    Kasai, Kiyoto
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 17
  • [9] The Japanese version of the questionnaire about the process of recovery: development and validity and reliability testing
    Akiko Kanehara
    Risa Kotake
    Yuki Miyamoto
    Yousuke Kumakura
    Kentaro Morita
    Tomoko Ishiura
    Kimiko Shimizu
    Yumiko Fujieda
    Shuntaro Ando
    Shinsuke Kondo
    Kiyoto Kasai
    BMC Psychiatry, 17
  • [10] The Reliability and Validity of The Caregiver Burden Inventory in Turkey
    Kucukguclu, Ozlem
    Esen, Aynur
    Yener, Goersev
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES-TURKISH, 2009, 26 (01): : 60 - 73