Wearable motion-based platform for functional spine health assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Mageswaran, Prasath [1 ,6 ]
Dufour, Jonathan [1 ]
Aurand, Alexander [1 ]
Knapik, Gregory [1 ]
Hani, Hamed [1 ]
Blakaj, Dukagjin M. [1 ,2 ]
Khan, Safdar [1 ,3 ]
Hussain, Nasir [1 ]
Tiwari, Maneesh [1 ]
Vallabh, Jayesh [1 ,4 ]
Weaver, Tristan [1 ,5 ]
Marras, William S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Spine Res Inst, Columbus, OH USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Orthoped, Columbus, OH USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Phys Med & Rehabil, Columbus, OH USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Anesthesiol, Columbus, OH USA
[6] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Back Pain; CHRONIC PAIN; Pain Management; OUTCOMES; TECHNOLOGY; LOW-BACK-PAIN; PHYSICAL FUNCTION; GLOBAL BURDEN; UNITED-STATES; LUMBAR SPINE; PROMIS; KINEMATICS; VALIDITY; PATIENT; CARE;
D O I
10.1136/rapm-2023-104840
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
IntroductionLow back pain is a significant burden to society and the lack of reliable outcome measures, combined with a prevailing inability to quantify the biopsychosocial elements implicated in the disease, impedes clinical decision-making and distorts treatment efficacy. This paper aims to validate the utility of a biopsychosocial spine platform to provide standardized wearable sensor-derived functional motion assessments to assess spine function and differentiate between healthy controls and patients. Secondarily, we explored the correlation between these motion features and subjective biopsychosocial measures.MethodsAn observational study was conducted on healthy controls (n=50) and patients with low back pain (n=50) to validate platform utility. The platform was used to conduct functional assessments along with patient-reported outcome assessments to holistically document cohort differences. Our primary outcomes were motion features; and our secondary outcomes were biopsychosocial measures (pain, function, etc).ResultsOur results demonstrated statistically significant differences in motion features between healthy and patient cohorts across anatomical planes. Importantly, we found velocity and acceleration in the axial plane showed the largest difference, with healthy controls having 49.7% and 55.7% higher values, respectively, than patients. In addition, we found significant correlations between motion features and biopsychosocial measures for pain, physical function and social role only.ConclusionsOur study validated the use of wearable sensor-derived functional motion metrics in differentiating healthy controls and patients. Collectively, this technology has the potential to facilitate holistic biopsychosocial evaluations to enhance spine care and improve patient outcomes.Trial registration numberNCT05776771.
引用
收藏
页码:518 / 527
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Motion-based prediction of external forces and moments and back loading during manual material handling tasks
    Muller, A.
    Pontonnier, C.
    Robert-Lachaine, X.
    Dumont, G.
    Plamondon, A.
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2020, 82
  • [42] Quantitative assessment of the motion of the lumbar spine in the low back pain population and the effect of different spinal pathologies on this motion
    McGregor A.H.
    McCarthy I.D.
    Doré C.J.
    Hughes S.P.
    European Spine Journal, 1997, 6 (5) : 308 - 315
  • [43] Core stability status classification based on mediolateral head motion during rhythmic movements and functional movement tests
    Jeong, Siwoo
    Kim, Si-Hyun
    Park, Kyue-Nam
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 9
  • [44] Continuous Assessment of Levodopa Response in Parkinson's Disease Using Wearable Motion Sensors
    Pulliam, Christopher L.
    Heldman, Dustin A.
    Brokaw, Elizabeth B.
    Mera, Thomas O.
    Mari, Zoltan K.
    Burack, Michelle A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 65 (01) : 159 - 164
  • [45] Normal Functional Range of Motion of the Lumbar Spine During 15 Activities of Daily Living
    Bible, Jesse E.
    Biswas, Debdut
    Miller, Christopher P.
    Whang, Peter G.
    Grauer, Jonathan N.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2010, 23 (02): : 106 - 112
  • [46] Preliminary Assessment of Accurate Motion Detection via Magnetic Tracking Toward Wearable Technologies
    Masiero, Federico
    Ianniciello, Valerio
    Raeli, Roberto
    Sinibaldi, Edoardo
    Masia, Lorenzo
    Cipriani, Christian
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIONICS, 2025, 7 (01): : 59 - 65
  • [47] Optical Marker-Based Motion Capture of the Human Spine: A Scoping Review of Study Design and Outcomes
    Romero-Flores, Claudia F.
    Bustamante-Bello, Rogelio
    Moya Bencomo, Marcos
    Martinez-Rios, Erick Axel
    Montesinos, Luis
    ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 52 (09) : 2373 - 2387
  • [48] Perioperative Nutritional, Functional, and Bone Health Optimization in Spine Surgery: A National Investigation of Spine Surgeons' Perceptions and Practices
    Higginbotham, Devan O.
    El-Othmani, Mouhanad M.
    Nham, Fong H.
    Alsoof, Daniel
    Diebo, Bassel G.
    McCarty, Scott A.
    Daniels, Alan H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2024, 32 (18) : 862 - 871
  • [49] Remote Patient Monitoring Using Mobile Health for Total Knee Arthroplasty: Validation of a Wearable and Machine Learning-Based Surveillance Platform
    Ramkumar, Prem N.
    Haeberle, Heather S.
    Ramanathan, Deepak
    Cantrell, William A.
    Navarro, Sergio M.
    Mont, Michael A.
    Bloomfield, Michael
    Patterson, Brendan M.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (10) : 2253 - 2259
  • [50] Motion-Based Ground Reaction Forces and Moments Prediction Method for Interaction With a Moving and/or Non-Horizontal Structure
    Demestre, Louise
    Morin, Pauline
    May, Francois
    Bideau, Nicolas
    Nicolas, Guillaume
    Pontonnier, Charles
    Dumont, Georges
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2022, 144 (11):