Wearable motion-based platform for functional spine health assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Mageswaran, Prasath [1 ,6 ]
Dufour, Jonathan [1 ]
Aurand, Alexander [1 ]
Knapik, Gregory [1 ]
Hani, Hamed [1 ]
Blakaj, Dukagjin M. [1 ,2 ]
Khan, Safdar [1 ,3 ]
Hussain, Nasir [1 ]
Tiwari, Maneesh [1 ]
Vallabh, Jayesh [1 ,4 ]
Weaver, Tristan [1 ,5 ]
Marras, William S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Spine Res Inst, Columbus, OH USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Orthoped, Columbus, OH USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Phys Med & Rehabil, Columbus, OH USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Anesthesiol, Columbus, OH USA
[6] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Back Pain; CHRONIC PAIN; Pain Management; OUTCOMES; TECHNOLOGY; LOW-BACK-PAIN; PHYSICAL FUNCTION; GLOBAL BURDEN; UNITED-STATES; LUMBAR SPINE; PROMIS; KINEMATICS; VALIDITY; PATIENT; CARE;
D O I
10.1136/rapm-2023-104840
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
IntroductionLow back pain is a significant burden to society and the lack of reliable outcome measures, combined with a prevailing inability to quantify the biopsychosocial elements implicated in the disease, impedes clinical decision-making and distorts treatment efficacy. This paper aims to validate the utility of a biopsychosocial spine platform to provide standardized wearable sensor-derived functional motion assessments to assess spine function and differentiate between healthy controls and patients. Secondarily, we explored the correlation between these motion features and subjective biopsychosocial measures.MethodsAn observational study was conducted on healthy controls (n=50) and patients with low back pain (n=50) to validate platform utility. The platform was used to conduct functional assessments along with patient-reported outcome assessments to holistically document cohort differences. Our primary outcomes were motion features; and our secondary outcomes were biopsychosocial measures (pain, function, etc).ResultsOur results demonstrated statistically significant differences in motion features between healthy and patient cohorts across anatomical planes. Importantly, we found velocity and acceleration in the axial plane showed the largest difference, with healthy controls having 49.7% and 55.7% higher values, respectively, than patients. In addition, we found significant correlations between motion features and biopsychosocial measures for pain, physical function and social role only.ConclusionsOur study validated the use of wearable sensor-derived functional motion metrics in differentiating healthy controls and patients. Collectively, this technology has the potential to facilitate holistic biopsychosocial evaluations to enhance spine care and improve patient outcomes.Trial registration numberNCT05776771.
引用
收藏
页码:518 / 527
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantitative dynamic wearable motion-based metric compared to patient-reported outcomes as indicators of functional recovery after lumbar fusion surgery
    Khan, Safdar
    Mageswaran, Prasath
    Brock, Guy
    Eisner, Mariah
    Ferguson, Sue A.
    Marras, William S.
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2022, 97
  • [2] Lumbatex: A Wearable Monitoring System Based on Inertial Sensors to Measure and Control the Lumbar Spine Motion
    Cortell-Tormo, Juan M.
    Garcia-Jaen, Miguel
    Ruiz-Fernandez, Daniel
    Fuster-Lloret, Vicent
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2019, 27 (08) : 1644 - 1653
  • [3] Wearable technology for spine movement assessment: A systematic review
    Papi, Enrica
    Koh, Woon Senn
    McGregor, Alison H.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2017, 64 : 186 - 197
  • [4] Wearable Motion Analysis System for Thoracic Spine Mobility With Inertial Sensors
    Zhu, Chenyao
    Luo, Lan
    Li, Rui
    Guo, Junhui
    Wang, Qining
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2024, 32 : 1884 - 1895
  • [5] Are Range of Motion-Based Guides Valid in Assessing True Impairment of Patients with Lumbar Spine Disorders?
    Bybee, R. F.
    Jones, J.
    Haan, J. A.
    McDonald, D.
    Pusateri, A.
    MANUELLE THERAPIE, 2007, 11 (02) : 80 - 87
  • [6] Segmental in vivo vertebral motion during functional human lumbar spine activities
    Li, Guoan
    Wang, Shaobai
    Passias, Peter
    Xia, Qun
    Li, Gang
    Wood, Kirkham
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 18 (07) : 1013 - 1021
  • [7] Extraction of Lumbar Spine Motion Using a 3-IMU Wearable Cluster
    Moon, Kee S.
    Gombatto, Sara P.
    Phan, Kim
    Ozturk, Yusuf
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [8] A missing link between fidelity and realism: an experts’ assessment of an advanced motion-based driving simulator
    Luzuriaga M.
    Trunzer S.
    Schick B.
    International Journal of Vehicle Systems Modelling and Testing, 2021, 15 (2-3): : 141 - 163
  • [9] Assessment of non-invasive intervertebral motion measurements in the lumbar spine
    Zhao, K
    Yang, C
    Zhao, CF
    An, KN
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2005, 38 (09) : 1943 - 1946
  • [10] Towards Wearable and Portable Spine Motion Analysis Through Dynamic Optimization of Smartphone Videos and IMU Data
    Wang, Wei
    Peng, Yinghu
    Sun, Yilun
    Wang, Jun
    Li, Guanglin
    IEEE JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2024, 28 (10) : 5929 - 5940