SGCN: A multi-order neighborhood feature fusion landform classification method based on superpixel and graph convolutional network

被引:6
作者
Fu, Honghao [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Yilang [1 ]
Liu, Yuxuan [3 ]
Li, Jingzhong [4 ]
Zhang, Xiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat sen Univ, Sch Geospatial Engn & Sci, Zhuhai 519082, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Instrument Sci & Engn, Nanjing 211189, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ Technol, Sch Comp Sci & Artificial Intelligence, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[4] Wuhan Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Sci, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
关键词
Landform classification; DEM; Superpixel; GCN; SEGMENTATION; TERRAIN; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jag.2023.103441
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
To address key issues with traditional landform classification methods that impact the integrity and continuity of the analysis area, as well as neglecting neighboring features, We presents a novel approach called superpixelbased graph convolutional network (SGCN) for automatic classification of digital elevation model (DEM) landform. The SGCN uses superpixel segmentation and graph convolutional networks (GCNs). Specifically, we employ the Simple Linear Iterative Clustering (SLIC) algorithm to perform superpixel segmentation on the DEM image and convert the resulting distribution of superpixels in the 2D image into a graph structure, where nodes are labeled. We then analyze the geographic features and external neighborhood relationships within each DEM superpixel to obtain corresponding node information for the graph structure. Finally, the GCN model is trained according to the graph structure, node feature information, and node label, enabling automatic recognition of node landform types. Importantly, SGCN accounts for the multi-order neighborhood features of the basic analysis unit and expresses the DEM micro-features relatively macroscopically. Experimental results demonstrate that compared with pixel-level semantic segmentation methods like U-Net, FCN, and SegNet, the SGCN significantly improves DEM landform classification accuracy by 17.84%, 33.22%, and 30.60%, respectively. Moreover, SGCN better preserves the integrity and continuity of features inside and outside the analysis area, overcoming the limitation of traditional methods that use regular grids as the basic analysis unit, which can compromise landform edge continuity.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]   Sensitivity and Performance Analyses of the Distributed Hydrology-Soil-Vegetation Model Using Geomorphons for Landform Mapping [J].
Melo, Pamela A. ;
Alvarenga, Livia A. ;
Tomasella, Javier ;
Mello, Carlos R. ;
Martins, Minella A. ;
Coelho, Gilberto .
WATER, 2021, 13 (15)
[22]   A review of landform classification methods [J].
Mokarram M. ;
Sathyamoorthy D. .
Spatial Information Research, 2018, 26 (06) :647-660
[23]  
Kipf TN, 2017, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1609.02907, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1609.02907]
[24]   Evaluating the potential for site-specific modification of LiDAR DEM derivatives to improve environmental planning-scale wetland identification using Random Forest classification [J].
O'Neil, Gina L. ;
Goodall, Jonathan L. ;
Watson, Layne T. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2018, 559 :192-208
[25]   Supervised landform classification of Northeast Honshu from DEM-derived thematic maps [J].
Prima, Oky Dicky Ardiansyah ;
Echigo, Ayako ;
Yokoyama, Ryuzo ;
Yoshida, Takeyoshi .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2006, 78 (3-4) :373-386
[26]  
Ren XF, 2003, NINTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, P10
[27]   Terrain and Surface Modeling Using Polarimetric SAR Data Features [J].
Sabry, Ramin .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 54 (02) :1170-1184
[28]   Extracting Centerlines From Dual-Line Roads Using Superpixel Segmentation [J].
Shen, Yilang ;
Ai, Tinghua ;
Yang, Min .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :15967-15979
[29]   Uncertainty and Overfitting in Fluvial Landform Classification Using Laser Scanned Data and Machine Learning: A Comparison of Pixel and Object-Based Approaches [J].
Szabo, Zsuzsanna Csatarine ;
Mikita, Tomas ;
Negyesi, Gabor ;
Varga, Orsolya Gyongyi ;
Burai, Peter ;
Takacs-Szilagyi, Laszlo ;
Szabo, Szilard .
REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (21) :1-29
[30]   Scientific attributes and expression methods of geographical boundary [J].
Tang, Guoan ;
Li, Jilong ;
Xiong, Liyang ;
Na, Jiaming .
JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 32 (06) :1119-1135