Clinical Decision Support Systems for Palliative Care Management: A Scoping Review

被引:9
作者
Dos Santos, Fabiana Cristina [1 ]
Snigurska, Urszula A. [1 ]
Keenan, Gail M. [1 ]
Lucero, Robert J. [2 ]
Modave, Francois [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Nursing, Dept Family Community & Hlth Syst Sci, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Nursing, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept MD Anesthesiol, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ Florida, Coll Nursing, Dept Family Community & Hlth Syst Sci, 1225 Ctr Dr,POB 100197, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Clinical decision support; clinical decision-making; palliative care; electronic health record; nursing; scoping review; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.03.006
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Context. With the expansion of palliative care services in clinical settings, clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have become increasingly crucial for assisting bedside nurses and other clinicians in improving the quality of care to patients with life-limiting health conditions. Objectives. To characterize palliative care CDSSs and explore end-users' actions taken, adherence recommendations, and clinical decision time. Methods. The CINAHL, Embase, and PubMed databases were searched from inception to September 2022. The review was developed following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews guidelines. Qualified studies were described in tables and assessed the level of evidence. Results. A total of 284 abstracts were screened, and 12 studies comprised the final sample. The CDSSs selected focused on identifying patients who could benefit from palliative care based on their health status, making referrals to palliative care services, and managing medications and symptom control. Despite the variability of palliative CDSSs, all studies reported that CDSSs assisted clinicians in becoming more informed about palliative care options leading to better decisions and improved patient outcomes. Seven studies explored the impact of CDSSs on end-user adherence. Three studies revealed high adherence to recommendations while four had low adherence. Lack of feature customization and trust in guideline-based in the initial stages of feasibility and usability testing were evident, limiting the usefulness for nurses and other clinicians. Conclusion. This study demonstrated that implementing palliative care CDSSs can assist nurses and other clinicians in improving the quality of care for palliative patients. The studies' different methodological approaches and variations in palliative CDSSs made it challenging to compare and validate the applicability under which CDSSs are effective. Further research utilizing rigorous methods to evaluate the impact of clinical decision support features and guideline-based actions on clinicians' adherence and efficiency is recommended. J Pain Symptom Manage 2023;66:e205-e218. & COPY; 2023 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E205 / E218
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Automation in nursing decision support systems: A systematic review of effects on decision making, care delivery, and patient outcomes [J].
Akbar, Saba ;
Lyell, David ;
Magrabi, Farah .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2021, 28 (11) :2502-2513
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, CLIN PRACT GUID QUAL, V4th
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Delivering high-quality cancer care: Charting a new course for a system in crisis, DOI DOI 10.17226/18359
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Dying in America: Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life
[5]   Feasibility and Acceptability of a Pharmacogenomic Decision Support System in Palliative Care [J].
Bull, Janet H. ;
Bice, Tyler ;
Satterwhite, Wesley J. ;
Massie, Lisa ;
Burpee, Elizabeth ;
Knotkova, Helena ;
Portenoy, Russell K. .
JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 25 (02) :219-226
[6]   A systematic review of the use of the electronic health record for patient identification, communication, and clinical support in palliative care [J].
Bush, Ruth A. ;
Perez, Alexa ;
Baum, Tanja ;
Etland, Caroline ;
Connelly, Cynthia D. .
JAMIA OPEN, 2018, 1 (02) :294-303
[7]   Feasibility of Using Algorithm-Based Clinical Decision Support for Symptom Assessment and Management in Lung Cancer [J].
Cooley, Mary E. ;
Blonquist, Traci M. ;
Catalano, Paul J. ;
Lobach, David F. ;
Halpenny, Barbara ;
McCorkle, Ruth ;
Johns, Ellis B. ;
Braun, Ilana M. ;
Rabin, Michael S. ;
Mataoui, Fatma Zohra ;
Finn, Kathleen ;
Berry, Donna L. ;
Abrahm, Janet L. .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2015, 49 (01) :13-26
[8]   Communication and decision-making in seriously ill patients: Findings of the SUPPORT project [J].
Covinsky, KE ;
Fuller, JD ;
Yaffe, K ;
Johnston, CB ;
Hamel, MB ;
Lynn, J ;
Teno, JM ;
Phillips, RS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2000, 48 (05) :S187-S193
[9]   Palliative Care Planner: A Pilot Study to Evaluate Acceptability and Usability of an Electronic Health Records System-integrated, Needs-targeted App Platform [J].
Cox, Christopher E. ;
Jones, Derek M. ;
Reagan, Wen ;
Key, Mary D. ;
Chow, Vinca ;
McFarlin, Jessica ;
Casarett, David ;
Creutzfeldt, Claire J. ;
Docherty, Sharron L. .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2018, 15 (01) :59-68
[10]  
Das M., 2010, Challenges and barriers to clinical decision support (CDS) design and implementation experienced in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality CDS demonstrations