ESG performance and green innovation: An investigation based on quantile regression

被引:127
作者
Long, Han [1 ]
Feng, Gen-Fu [1 ]
Gong, Qiang [2 ]
Chang, Chun-Ping [3 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Econ & Finance, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Wenlan Sch Business, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Shih Chien Univ, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
green innovation; national ESG performance; quantile regression; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PRODUCT INNOVATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; ECO-INNOVATION; LEVEL EVIDENCE; CORRUPTION; MANAGEMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1002/bse.3410
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Using panel data from 37 countries from 1990 to 2019 and applying a quantile regression approach with panel fixed effects, we investigate the impact of national Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance on green innovation and how this impact varies across different green innovation capacity distributions. The research conclusions are as follows. (1) National ESG performance improvement significantly promotes green innovation. (2) The improvement of environmental performance and governance performance significantly promotes green innovation, but in countries with weak green innovation capabilities, the improvement of social performance reduces the output of green innovation. (3) The role of national ESG performance in promoting green innovation is stronger in countries with weak green innovation capabilities. (4) In non-high-income countries, the stronger the green innovation capability is, the more obvious is the promotion of ESG performance to green innovation. The findings of this paper provide empirical evidence and a policy basis for governments to focus on improving ESG performance and to commit to promoting green innovation activities more effectively.
引用
收藏
页码:5102 / 5118
页数:17
相关论文
共 121 条
[1]  
Abanyie S. K., 2023, GHANA INNOVATION GRE, V2, DOI [10.1016/j.igd.2023.100033, DOI 10.1016/J.IGD.2023.100033]
[2]   Impact of knowledge management practices on green innovation and corporate sustainable development: A structural analysis [J].
Abbas, Jawad ;
Sagsan, Mustafa .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 229 :611-620
[3]   Role of green innovation, trade and energy to promote green economic growth: a case of South Asian Nations [J].
Ahmed, Farhan ;
Kousar, Shazia ;
Pervaiz, Amber ;
Trinidad-Segovia, Juan E. ;
Casado-Belmonte, Maria Del Pilar ;
Ahmed, Wisal .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (05) :6871-6885
[4]   The role of spatial agglomeration in a structural model of innovation, productivity and export: a firm-level analysis [J].
Antonietti, Roberto ;
Cainelli, Giulio .
ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2011, 46 (03) :577-600
[5]   The second green revolution: Innovative urban agriculture's contribution to food security and sustainability - A review [J].
Armanda, Dian T. ;
Guinee, Jeroen B. ;
Tukker, Arnold .
GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY-AGRICULTURE POLICY ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 22 :13-24
[6]   The Consolidation of the ESG Rating Industry as an Enactment of Institutional Retrogression [J].
Avetisyan, Emma ;
Hockerts, Kai .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 26 (03) :316-330
[7]   External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance [J].
Ben Arfi, Wissal ;
Hikkerova, Lubica ;
Sahut, Jean-Michel .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2018, 129 :210-220
[8]   The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China [J].
Broadstock, David C. ;
Chan, Kalok ;
Cheng, Louis T. W. ;
Wang, Xiaowei .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 38
[9]   Sustainability engagement's impact on tourism sector performance: linear and nonlinear models [J].
Buallay, Amina ;
Al-Ajmi, Jasim ;
Barone, Elisabetta .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT, 2022, 35 (02) :361-384
[10]   Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector [J].
Buallay, Amina .
MANAGEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2019, 30 (01) :98-115