Targeted Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Quantitative Gleason 4 Grading Prediction in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: Implications for Active Surveillance Candidate Selection

被引:5
作者
Kachanov, Mykyta [1 ,2 ]
Budaeus, Lars [1 ]
Beyersdorff, Dirk [1 ,3 ]
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. [4 ]
Tian, Zhe [4 ]
Falkenbach, Fabian [1 ]
Tilki, Derya [1 ,5 ]
Maurer, Tobias [1 ,5 ]
Sauter, Guido [6 ]
Graefen, Markus [1 ]
Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi [7 ]
机构
[1] Prostate Canc Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Klin, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Inst Human Genet, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol & Nucl Med, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Univ Montreal Hlth Ctr, Div Urol, Canc Prognost & Hlth Outcomes Unit, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Hamburg, Germany
[6] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Pathol, Hamburg, Germany
[7] St Antonius Hosp, Prostate Ctr Northwest, Dept Urol Pediat Urol & Uro Oncol, Gronau, Germany
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2023年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Multiparametric magnetic; resonance imaging; Targeted biopsy; Quantitative Gleason grade; CANCER; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2022.09.010
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Quantitative Gleason grading appears to be a reliable prognostic parameter and provides broader risk stratification then the traditional Gleason grading in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with radical prostatectomy (RP).Objective: To determine if quantification of Gleason pattern (GP) 4 for targeted and sys-tematic biopsy (TBx + SBx) cores together with further clinical variables can identify the lowest quantitative GP 4 fraction on RP.Design, setting, and participants: A total of 548 patients underwent TBx + SBx of the pros-tate and then RP, with pathology revealing Gleason score 3 + 4, 4 + 3, or 4 + 4 disease.Intervention: TBx + SBx of the prostate followed by RP.Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: GP 4 fraction thresholds of <5%, <10%, <15%, <20%, and <25% were compared between the TBx + SBx and RP specimens. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy for predicting the GP 4 fraction in the RP specimen were determined. Logistic regression models were used to establish a probabilistic relationship between various combinations of clinical and biopsy variables and the GP 4 fraction in the RP specimen. Results and limitations: GP 4 fractions of <5%, <10%, <15%, <20%, and <25% was observed in 33%, 49%, 58%, 65%, and 70% of patients on TBx, and 18%, 41%, 53%, 63%, and 70% of patients on RP, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and accu-racy were 75%, 67%, 91%, 39%, and 74% for a TBx GP 4 fraction of <5%, and 65%, 85%, 65%, 85%, and 79% for a TBx GP 4 fraction of <25%, respectively. A model combining quanti-fied TBx + SBx GP 4 with clinical parameters demonstrated the highest diagnostic accu-racy. Limitations include the retrospective study design.Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that the combination of MRI-TBx + SBx and GP 4 quantification allowed precise detection of a low fraction of GP 4 when using RP speci-mens as the reference standard. Moreover, we found that clinical variables including Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score without biopsy are limited in detec-tion of low GP 4 fractions.Patient summary: Combination of targeted biopsy alone as well as combined with sys-tematic biopsy and quantitative Gleason grading of biopsy specimen showed high agree-ment with pathology findings after surgical removal of the prostate. This could help in identifying patients who are suitable for active surveillance.(c) 2022 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 308
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] The Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance (MRIAS) Trial: Use of Baseline Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Saturation Biopsy to Reduce the Frequency of Surveillance Prostate Biopsies
    Amin, Amer
    Scheltema, Matthijs J.
    Shnier, Ron
    Blazevski, Alexandar
    Moses, Daniel
    Cusick, Thomas
    Siriwardena, Amila
    Yuen, Brian
    van Leeuwen, Pim J.
    Haynes, Anne Maree
    Matthews, Jayne
    Brenner, Phillip
    O'Neill, Gordon
    Yuen, Carlo
    Delprado, Warick
    Stricker, Phillip
    Thompson, James
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (05) : 910 - 917
  • [2] Does the introduction of prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging into the active surveillance protocol for localized prostate cancer improve patient re-classification?
    Bryant, Richard J.
    Yang, Bob
    Philippou, Yiannis
    Lam, Karla
    Obiakor, Maureen
    Ayers, Jennifer
    Chiocchia, Virginia
    Gleeson, Fergus
    MacPherson, Ruth
    Verrill, Clare
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Hamdy, Freddie C.
    Brewster, Simon F.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (05) : 794 - 800
  • [3] Prognostic Value of Percent Gleason Grade 4 at Prostate Biopsy in Predicting Prostatectomy Pathology and Recurrence
    Cole, Adam I.
    Morgan, Todd M.
    Spratt, Daniel E.
    Palapattu, Ganesh S.
    He, Chang
    Tomlins, Scott A.
    Weizer, Alon Z.
    Feng, Felix Y.
    Wu, Angela
    Siddiqui, Javed
    Chinnaiyan, Arul M.
    Montgomery, Jeffrey S.
    Kunju, Lakshmi P.
    Miller, David C.
    Hollenbeck, Brent K.
    Wei, John T.
    Mehra, Rohit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (02) : 405 - 411
  • [4] Trends in Management for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer, 1990-2013
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 314 (01): : 80 - 82
  • [5] Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Men With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Hilton, Joan F.
    Reese, Adam C.
    Zaid, Harras B.
    Porten, Sima P.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Meng, Maxwell V.
    Greene, Kirsten L.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (02) : 228 - 234
  • [6] Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer: Incremental Value
    Felker, Ely R.
    Wu, Jason
    Natarajan, Shyam
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Raman, Steven S.
    Huang, Jiaoti
    Dorey, Fred
    Marks, Leonard S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (05) : 1421 - 1427
  • [7] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Fusion Biopsy to Detect Progression in Patients with Existing Lesions on Active Surveillance for Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
    Frye, Thomas P.
    George, Arvin K.
    Kilchevsky, Amichai
    Maruf, Mahir
    Siddiqui, M. Minhaj
    Kongnyuy, Michael
    Muthigi, Akhil
    Han, Hui
    Parnes, Howard L.
    Merino, Maria
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Wood, Brad
    Pinto, Peter A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (03) : 640 - 646
  • [8] Four-year outcomes from a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based active surveillance programme: PSA dynamics and serial MRI scans allow omission of protocol biopsies
    Gallagher, Kevin Michael
    Christopher, Edward
    Cameron, Andrew James
    Little, Scott
    Innes, Alasdair
    Davis, Gill
    Keanie, Julian
    Bollina, Prasad
    McNeill, Alan
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 123 (03) : 429 - 438
  • [9] Update on Multiparametric Prostate MRI During Active Surveillance: Current and Future Trends and Role of the PRECISE Recommendations
    Giganti, Francesco
    Kirkham, Alex
    Allen, Clare
    Punwani, Shonit
    Orczyk, Clement
    Emberton, Mark
    Moore, Caroline M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 216 (04) : 943 - 951
  • [10] Optimizing Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Targeted and Systematic Biopsy Strategies: Sparing the Multiparametric MRI-Negative Transitional Zone in Presence of Exclusively Peripheral Multiparametric MRI-Suspect Lesions
    Kachanov, Mykyta
    Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi
    Roberts, Matthew J.
    Sauer, Markus
    Beyersdorff, Dirk
    Boiko, Svitlana
    Maurer, Tobias
    Steuber, Thomas
    Graefen, Markus
    Budaeus, Lars
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (02) : 334 - 340