Life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions for a novel algal-osmosis membrane system versus conventional advanced potable water reuse processes: Part I

被引:4
作者
Lugo, Abdiel [1 ]
Bandara, G. L. Chathurika L. [1 ]
Xu, Xuesong [1 ]
de Almeida, Juliano Penteado [1 ]
Abeysiriwardana-Arachchige, I. S. A. [1 ]
Nirmalakhandan, Nagamany [1 ]
Xu, Pei [1 ]
机构
[1] New Mexico State Univ, Civil Engn Dept, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Potable water reuse; Life cycle assessment; Energy consumption; Greenhouse gas emission; Algal wastewater treatment; Advanced water treatment processes; MUNICIPAL WASTE-WATER; TREATMENT PLANTS; HYDROTHERMAL LIQUEFACTION; SEAWATER DESALINATION; GALDIERIA-SULPHURARIA; SCALE; PERFORMANCE; CONSUMPTION; EFFICIENCY; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117293
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study applied a life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology for a comparative environmental analysis between an innovative algae resource recovery and near zero-liquid discharge potable reuse system (i.e., the main system) versus a conventional potable reuse system (i.e., the benchmark system) through energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The objective of this study is to demonstrate that pilot-scale data coupled with LCA would provide valuable information for system optimization, integration, and improvements for the design of envi-ronmentally sustainable full-scale systems. This study also provides decision-makers valuable information regarding the energy demand and environmental impact of this innovative main system compared to a typical tried-and-true system for potable water reuse. The main system consists of a novel algal-based wastewater treatment coupled with a dual forward osmosis and seawater reverse osmosis (Algal FO-SWRO) membranes system for potable water recovery and hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) to recover biofuels and valuable nu-trients from the harvested algal biomass. The benchmark system refers to the current industry standard tech-nologies for potable water reuse and waste management including a secondary biological treatment, microfiltration (MF), brackish water reverse osmosis (BWRO), ultraviolet/advanced oxidation process (UV-AOP), and granular activated carbon (GAC), as well as anaerobic digestion for sludge treatment. Respective energy and GHG emissions of both systems were normalized and compared considering 1 m3 of water recovered. Based on an overall water recovery of 76% designed for the benchmark system, the energy consumption totaled 4.83 kWh/ m3, and the system was estimated to generate 2.42 kg of CO2 equivalent/m3 with most of the emissions coming from the biological treatment. The main system, based on an overall water recovery of 88%, was estimated to consume 4.76 kWh/m3 and emit 1.49 kg of CO2 eq/m3. The main system has high environmental resilience and can recover bioenergy and nutrients from wastewater with zero waste disposal. With the application of energy recovery devices for the HTL and the SWRO, increase in water recovery of the FO membrane, and replacement of the SWRO membrane with BWRO, the main system provides an energy-competitive and environmentally positive alternative with an energy demand of 2.57 kWh/m3 and low GHG emissions of 0.94 kg CO2 eq/m3.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 120 条
  • [1] Modeling and optimization of an algal-based sewage treatment and resource recovery (STaRR) system
    Abeysiriwardana-Arachchige, I. S. A.
    Delanka-Pedige, H. M. K.
    Munasinghe-Arachchige, S. P.
    Brewer, C. E.
    Nirmalakhandan, N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (02):
  • [2] Removal and recovery of nutrients from municipal sewage: Algal vs. conventional approaches
    Abeysiriwardana-Arachchige, I. S. A.
    Munasinghe-Arachchige, S. P.
    Delanka-Pedige, H. M. K.
    Nirmalakhandan, N.
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2020, 175
  • [3] Abeysiriwardana-Arachchige I.S.A., 2019, ALGAL RES, V43, P1
  • [4] Recovery of Nutrients From Wastewaters Using Microalgae
    Acien Fernandez, Francisco Gabriel
    Gomez-Serrano, Cintia
    Maria Fernandez-Sevilla, Jose
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2018, 2
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, Greenhouse gas emissions estimation methodologies for biogenic emissions from selected source categories: Solid waste disposal wastewater treatment ethanol fermentation
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1997, Regional Wastewater Plan for The East El Paso Area
  • [7] Arcadis, 2016, ADV WAT PUR FAC PIL
  • [8] Avagyan A., 2013, Journal of Sustainable Bioenergy Systems, V3, P287, DOI [DOI 10.4236/JSBS.2013.34038, 10.4236/jsbs.2013.34038]
  • [9] The status of forward osmosis technology implementation
    Awad, Abdelrahman M.
    Jalab, Rem
    Minier-Matar, Joel
    Adham, Samer
    Nasser, Mustafa S.
    Judd, S. J.
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2019, 461 : 10 - 21
  • [10] Bandara C., 2022, J ENVIRON MANAGE, V304, P1