Water-energy-carbon synergies and trade-offs: A daily nexus analysis for wastewater treatment plants

被引:36
作者
Ni, Xiaojing [1 ]
Huang, Xiangfeng [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Ru [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Jinhui [4 ]
Peng, Kaiming [1 ]
Zhang, Wei [5 ]
Zhu, Yuyu [5 ]
Yang, Weilan [5 ]
Wang, Liya [1 ]
Cai, Chen [1 ]
Liu, Jia [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Erwu [6 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, Inst Carbon Neutral, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[3] Key Lab Cities Mitigat & Adaptat Climate Change Sh, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Coll Ocean Sci & Engn, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
[5] Wuxi Water Grp Co Ltd, Wuxi 214031, Peoples R China
[6] Tongji Univ, Coll Elect Informat & Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
关键词
Water-energy-carbon nexus; Trade-off; Synergy; Water-energy-carbon coupling index (WECCI); Four -quadrant clustering (FQC) method; Standard upgrade; FOOTPRINT ASSESSMENT; CHINA; EFFICIENCY; SYSTEMS; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106712
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Given the increasing interest in achieving carbon neutrality, water-energy-carbon synergy and trade-off mechanisms are critical for the sustainability of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Based on daily opera-tion data of a WWTP in southern China from 2007 to 2021, we propose a new approach to explore the water--energy-carbon (WEC) nexus of WWTPs by developing a Water-Energy-Carbon Coupling Index (WECCI) and a four-quadrant clustering (FQC) method. It is found that the WECCI increased by 10.12% after the first standard upgrade and decreased by 8.20% after the second standard upgrade, which indicates that the transformation of WWTP may lead to unexpected change in the overall performance. Based on the FQC method, 85.64% of the operation data are mainly concentrated in the WEC best synergy zone after the first standard upgrade, whereas 58.52% of the operation data are concentrated in the low carbon trade-off zone after the second standard up-grade. This study indicates that WECCI and FQC are necessary tools to quantitively assess the integrated per-formance of WWTPs for better understanding the complex WEC mechanisms of WWTPs, which facilitate the sustainable transition of WWTPs towards carbon neutrality.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Fundamental and Applied Climatology, V2, P5
[2]  
Arjen Y.H., 2012, WATER FOOTPRINT ASSE
[3]   Efficiency evaluation for regional urban water use and wastewater decontamination systems in China: A DEA approach [J].
Bian, Yiwen ;
Yan, Shuai ;
Xu, Hao .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2014, 83 :15-23
[4]   Energy performance factors in wastewater treatment plants: A review [J].
Cardoso, Bruno J. ;
Rodrigues, Eugenio ;
Gaspar, Adelio R. ;
Gomes, Alvaro .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 322 (322)
[5]  
Carr M., 2007, Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Industrial Biotechnology and Biorefining
[6]   The application of footprints for assessing the sustainability of wastewater treatment plants: A review [J].
Chen, Ke-Hua ;
Wang, Hong-Cheng ;
Han, Jing-Long ;
Liu, Wen-Zong ;
Cheng, Hao-Yi ;
Liang, Bin ;
Wang, Ai-Jie .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 277
[7]  
Chhipi-Shrestha G, 2017, J WATER RES PLAN MAN, V143, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000765, 10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000765]
[8]   Carbon footprint and life cycle assessment of centralised and decentralised handling of wastewater during rain [J].
Clauson-Kaas, Jes ;
Sorensen, Birgitte Lilholt ;
Dalgaard, Ole G. ;
Sharma, Anitha K. ;
Johansen, Niels Bent ;
Rindel, Kim ;
Andersen, Helle K. .
JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2012, 3 (04) :266-275
[9]   Site-specific carbon footprints of Scandinavian wastewater treatment plants, using the life cycle assessment approach [J].
Delre, Antonio ;
ten Hoeve, Marieke ;
Scheutz, Charlotte .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 211 :1001-1014
[10]   Hynol - An economical process for methanol production from biomass and natural gas with reduced CO2 emission [J].
Dong, YJ ;
Steinberg, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 1997, 22 (10-11) :971-977