New Fragility Curves for Evaluation of the Vulnerability of Bridges to Earthquakes in Iran

被引:1
作者
Harandi, Vahideh Shirvani [1 ]
Mansouri, Babak [2 ]
Hosseini, Kambod Amini [2 ]
机构
[1] Int Inst Earthquake Engn & Seismol IIEES, Tehran, Iran
[2] IIEES, Tehran, Iran
关键词
bridge damage; fragility curve; seismic risk; transportation networks; vulnerability; SEISMIC FRAGILITY; HIGHWAY BRIDGES; GROUND-MOTION; TYPICAL BRIDGES; MODELS; VARIABILITY;
D O I
10.1080/10168664.2024.2318323
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Bridges are vulnerable structures in transportation networks, as demonstrated by the results of recent earthquakes worldwide. Their failure can lead to disruptions in the functionality of road networks and cause delays in emergency response and recovery after earthquakes. Researchers have developed different fragility functions to assess the vulnerability of bridges to earthquakes. However, suitable fragility curves are not available for many types of bridges for seismic-risk assessment of transportation networks. The current study presents new fragility functions for four common bridge categories in Iran. For this purpose, existing fragility curves were collected through a systematic literature review according to the bridge typologies. The analytical hierarchy process was used to adjust the collected functions for the case of Iran based on expert opinion, considering local practices, bridge similarities, and construction quality. The newly developed fragility functions were validated by converting the data to vulnerability curves and comparing them to the damage observed to bridges from past earthquakes in Iran and other countries under similar conditions. The results revealed that, for over 50% of the evaluated damaged bridges, the relative error in vulnerability curves for estimating the loss ratio was below 20%.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / 504
页数:15
相关论文
共 77 条
  • [1] Agha Kuchaki Hoseini M., 2018, SEISMIC VULNERABILIT
  • [2] Seismic fragility analysis of reinforced concrete continuous span bridges with irregular configuration
    Akbari, Reza
    [J]. STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2012, 8 (09) : 873 - 889
  • [3] The Variability of Ground-Motion Prediction Models and Its Components
    Al Atik, Linda
    Abrahamson, Norman
    Bommer, Julian J.
    Scherbaum, Frank
    Cotton, Fabrice
    Kuehn, Nicolas
    [J]. SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2010, 81 (05) : 794 - 801
  • [4] A Survey of Damages to Bridges in Pakistan after the Major Earthquake of 8 October 2005
    Ali, Syed M.
    Khan, Akhtar N.
    Rahman, Shahzad
    Reinhorn, Andrei M.
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2011, 27 (04) : 947 - 970
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1996, ATC-40. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2003, Multi-hazard Loss Estimation Methodology Earthquake Model HAZUS-MH MR3 Technical Manual
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1985, ATC13 FEMA
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1996, IMPROVED SEISMIC DES
  • [9] Askari F., 2004, JSEE SPECIAL ISSUE, V5, P69
  • [10] Relationships between felt intensity and instrumental ground motion in the central United States and California
    Atkinson, Gail M.
    Kaka, SanLinn I.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2007, 97 (02) : 497 - 510