Comparison of the diagnostic performance of three ultrasound thyroid nodule risk stratification systems for follicular thyroid neoplasm: K-TIRADS, ACR -TIRADS and C-TIRADS

被引:4
|
作者
Li, Hua-Juan [1 ]
Yang, Yu-Ping [1 ]
Liang, Xin [1 ]
Zhang, Zhi [2 ]
Xu, Xiao-Hong [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Med Univ, Dept Ultrasound, Affiliated Hosp, Zhanjiang, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Med Univ, Dept Thyroid & Mammary Vasc Surg, Affiliated Hosp, Zhanjiang, Peoples R China
关键词
TIRADS; follicular thyroid adenoma; follicular thyroid carcinoma; CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND; FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; CONVENTIONAL ULTRASOUND; EGGSHELL CALCIFICATION; CONSENSUS STATEMENT; WHITE PAPER; FEATURES; CARCINOMA; CANCER; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.3233/CH-231898
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To explore the diagnostic performance of the currently used ultrasound-based thyroid nodule risk stratification systems (K-TIRADS, ACR -TIRADS, and C-TIRADS) in differentiating follicular thyroid adenoma (FTA) from follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC). METHODS: Clinical data and preoperative ultrasonographic images of 269 follicular thyroid neoplasms were retrospectively analyzed. All of them were detected by Color Doppler ultrasound instruments equipped with high-frequency liner array probes (e.g. Toshiba Apoli500 with L5-14MHZ; Philips IU22 with L5-12MHZ; GE LOGIQ E9 with L9-12MHZ and MyLab Class C with L9-14MHZ). The diagnostic performance of three TIRADS classifications for differentiating FTA from FTC was evaluated by drawing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculating the cut-off values. RESULTS: Of the 269 follicular neoplasms (mean size, 3.67 +/- 1.53 cm), 209 were FTAs (mean size, 3.56 +/- 1.38 cm) and 60 were FTCs (mean size, 4.07 +/- 1.93 cm). There were significant differences in ultrasound features such as margins, calcifications, and vascularity of thyroid nodules between the FTA and FTC groups (P < 0.05). According to the ROC curve comparison analysis, the diagnostic cut-off values of K-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and C-TIRADS for identifying FTA and FTC were K-TR4, ACR-TR4, and C-TR4B, respectively, and the areas under the curves were 0.676, 0.728, and 0.719, respectively. The difference between ACR-TIRADS and K-TIRADS classification was statistically significant (P = 0.0241), whereas the differences between ACR-TIRADS and C-TIRADS classification and between K-TIRADS and C-TIRADS classification were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The three TIRADS classifications were not conducive to distinguishing FTA from FTC. It is necessary to develop a novel malignant risk stratification system specifically for the identification of follicular thyroid neoplasms.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 406
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Differentiation of Thyroid Nodules (C-TIRADS 4) by Combining Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Diagnosis Model With Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System
    Zhu, Tiantong
    Chen, Jiahui
    Zhou, Zimo
    Ma, Xiaofen
    Huang, Ying
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [42] Diagnostic performance of ACR-TIRADS combined with superb microvascular imaging for differential diagnosis of mummified thyroid nodules and papillary thyroid carcinomas
    Tian, Jiali
    Liang, Jinlei
    Lin, Yuhong
    Wang, Liping
    Chen, Xiaobo
    ENDOCRINE CONNECTIONS, 2024, 13 (03)
  • [43] Nodules with nonspecific ultrasound pattern according to the 2015 American Thyroid Association malignancy risk stratification system A comparison to the Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS-Na)
    Xiang, Pingping
    Chu, Xiaoqiu
    Chen, Guofang
    Liu, Binbin
    Ding, Wenbo
    Zeng, Zheng
    Wu, Xinping
    Wang, Jianhua
    Xu, Shuhang
    Liu, Chao
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (44)
  • [44] Comparison of British Thyroid Association, American College of Radiology TIRADS and Artificial Intelligence TIRADS with histological correlation: diagnostic performance for predicting thyroid malignancy and unnecessary fine needle aspiration rate
    Watkins, Linda
    O'Neill, Greg
    Young, David
    McArthur, Claire
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 94 (1123)
  • [45] Diagnostic Performance of Thyroid Nodule Risk Stratification Systems
    Yucel, Serap
    Balci, Isa Gokturk
    Tomak, Leman
    ULTRASOUND QUARTERLY, 2023, 39 (04) : 206 - 211
  • [46] Clinical Application of C-TIRADS Category and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Differential Diagnosis of Solid Thyroid Nodules Measuring?1 cm
    Jin, Zhuang
    Zhu, Yaqiong
    Lei, Yu
    Yu, Xin
    Jiang, Nan
    Gao, Yue
    Cao, Junying
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2022, 28
  • [47] Diagnostic performance of six ultrasound-based risk stratification systems in thyroid follicular neoplasm: A retrospective multi-center study
    Yang, Jingjing
    Sun, Yu
    Li, Xingjia
    Zhao, Yueting
    Han, Xue
    Chen, Guofang
    Ding, Wenbo
    Li, Ruiping
    Wang, Jianhua
    Xiao, Fangsen
    Liu, Chao
    Xu, Shuhang
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [48] Explore the diagnostic performance of 2020 Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by comparing with the 2017 ACR-TIRADS guidelines: a single-center study
    Cai, Miaomiao
    Chen, Libo
    Shui, Limin
    Lv, Xuan
    Wang, Hui
    ENDOCRINE, 2023, 80 (02) : 399 - 407
  • [49] Validation of Diagnostic Performance and Interobserver Agreement of DTD-TIRADS for Diffuse Thyroid Disease on Ultrasound: A Single-Center Study
    Baek, Hye Jin
    Ryu, Kyeong Hwa
    An, Hyo Jung
    Kim, Jin Pyeong
    Jung, Eun Jung
    Kim, Dong Wook
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2021, 216 (05) : 1329 - 1334
  • [50] Diagnostic Performance of Kwak, EU, ACR, and Korean TIRADS as Well as ATA Guidelines for the Ultrasound Risk Stratification of Non-Autonomously Functioning Thyroid Nodules in a Region with Long History of Iodine Deficiency: A German Multicenter Trial
    Seifert, Philipp
    Schenke, Simone
    Zimny, Michael
    Stahl, Alexander
    Grunert, Michael
    Klemenz, Burkhard
    Freesmeyer, Martin
    Kreissl, Michael C.
    Herrmann, Ken
    Goerges, Rainer
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (17)