FFLUX molecular simulations driven by atomic Gaussian process regression models

被引:3
|
作者
Manchev, Yulian T. [1 ]
Popelier, Paul L. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Dept Chem, Manchester M13 9PL, England
基金
欧洲研究理事会; 英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
FFLUX; Gaussian process regression; Interacting Quantum Atoms (IQA); machine learning; molecular dynamics; multipole moments; QTAIM; Quantum chemical topology (QCT); FORCE-FIELD; AUTOMATED PARAMETRIZATION; DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; CHEMICAL TOPOLOGY; CONDENSED-PHASE; OPTIMIZATION; MECHANICS; ENERGY; PARAMETERS; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1002/jcc.27323
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Machine learning (ML) force fields are revolutionizing molecular dynamics (MD) simulations as they bypass the computational cost associated with ab initio methods but do not sacrifice accuracy in the process. In this work, the GPyTorch library is used to create Gaussian process regression (GPR) models that are interfaced with the next-generation ML force field FFLUX. These models predict atomic properties of different molecular configurations that appear in a progressing MD simulation. An improved kernel function is utilized to correctly capture the periodicity of the input descriptors. The first FFLUX molecular simulations of ammonia, methanol, and malondialdehyde with the updated kernel are performed. Geometry optimizations with the GPR models result in highly accurate final structures with a maximum root-mean-squared deviation of 0.064 & Aring; and sub-kJ mol(-1) total energy predictions. Additionally, the models are tested in 298 K MD simulations with FFLUX to benchmark for robustness. The resulting energy and force predictions throughout the simulation are in excellent agreement with ab initio data for ammonia and methanol but decrease in quality for malondialdehyde due to the increased system complexity. GPR model improvements are discussed, which will ensure the future scalability to larger systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1235 / 1246
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adaptive Gaussian process regression for efficient building of surrogate models in inverse problems
    Semler, Phillip
    Weiser, Martin
    INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2023, 39 (12)
  • [32] Aerodynamic probe calibration using Gaussian process regression
    Heckmeier, Florian M.
    Breitsamter, Christian
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 31 (12)
  • [33] State of Health Estimation with an Improved Gaussian Process Regression
    Wang, Zengkai
    Zeng, Shengkui
    Guo, Jianbin
    2019 ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM (RAMS 2019) - R & M IN THE SECOND MACHINE AGE - THE CHALLENGE OF CYBER PHYSICAL SYSTEMS, 2019,
  • [34] Optimal computation budget allocation with Gaussian process regression
    Hu, Mingjie
    Xu, Jie
    Chen, Chun-Hung
    Hu, Jian-Qiang
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2025, 322 (01) : 147 - 156
  • [35] Interpolation of wind pressures using Gaussian process regression
    Ma, Xingliang
    Xu, Fuyou
    Chen, Bo
    JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2019, 188 : 30 - 42
  • [36] Benchmarking of quantum fidelity kernels for Gaussian process regression
    Guo, Xuyang
    Dai, Jun
    Krems, Roman, V
    MACHINE LEARNING-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 5 (03):
  • [37] Bias Estimation and Downscaling for Regional Climate Models Using Gaussian Process Regression
    Kupilik, Matthew
    Witmer, Frank
    Grill, Olivia
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 118362 - 118370
  • [38] Data Driven Prognosis of Fracture Dynamics Using Tensor Train and Gaussian Process Regression
    Duong, Pham Luu Trung
    Hussain, Shaista
    Jhon, Mark Hyunpong
    Raghavan, Nagarajan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 222256 - 222266
  • [39] On the use of Gaussian process regression and multiple imputation in Cox regression models with time-dependent covariates
    Tanaka, Kenta
    Sugimoto, Tomoyuki
    2024 IEEE 48TH ANNUAL COMPUTERS, SOFTWARE, AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE, COMPSAC 2024, 2024, : 1955 - 1960
  • [40] Using Gaussian process regression to simulate the vibrational Raman spectra of molecular crystals
    Raimbault, Nathaniel
    Grisafi, Andrea
    Ceriotti, Michele
    Rossi, Mariana
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2019, 21 (10):