An overview of the peer review process in biomedical sciences

被引:2
|
作者
Miller, Edward [1 ,11 ]
James Weightman, Michael [2 ,3 ]
Basu, Ashna [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Amos, Andrew [7 ]
Brakoulias, Vlasios [8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Div Psychol Med, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Med, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Med & Publ Hlth, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
[4] Prince Wales Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] UNSW, Discipline Psychiat & Mental Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Royal Australian & New Zealand Coll Psychiat, Comm Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] James Cook Univ, Sch Med & Dent, Townsville, Qld, Australia
[8] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[9] Western Sydney Univ, Translat Hlth Res Inst THRI, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[10] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Specialty Psychiat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[11] Univ Auckland, Div Psychol Med, Bldg 507,28 Pk Ave, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
关键词
medical education; peer review; biomedical publishing; psychiatry; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1177/10398562241231460
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective This paper aims to provide an introductory resource for beginner peer reviewers in psychiatry and the broader biomedical science field. It will provide a concise overview of the peer review process, alongside some reviewing tips and tricks.Conclusion The peer review process is a fundamental aspect of biomedical science publishing. The model of peer review offered varies between journals and usually relies on a pool of volunteers with differing levels of expertise and scope. The aim of peer review is to collaboratively leverage reviewers' collective knowledge with the objective of increasing the quality and merit of published works. The limitations, methodology and need for transparency in the peer review process are often poorly understood. Although imperfect, the peer review process provides some degree of scientific rigour by emphasising the need for an ethical, comprehensive and systematic approach to reviewing articles. Contributions from junior reviewers can add significant value to manuscripts.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 251
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biomedical Biopolymers, their Origin and Evolution in Biomedical Sciences: A Systematic Review
    Yadav, Preeti
    Yadav, Harsh
    Shah, Veena Gowri
    Shah, Gaurav
    Dhaka, Gaurav
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2015, 9 (09) : ZE21 - ZE25
  • [22] Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals
    Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
    Kitas, George D.
    CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 53 (04) : 386 - 389
  • [23] Editors' perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study
    Glonti, Ketevan
    Hren, Darko
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (10):
  • [24] An overview of studies assessing predatory journals within the biomedical sciences
    Althaus, Felix
    Kohl, Carla Brigitte Susan
    Faggion Jr, Clovis Mariano
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2025,
  • [25] The Peer Review Process
    Flanagan, Jane
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING KNOWLEDGE, 2014, 25 (03) : 131 - 131
  • [26] The peer review process
    Tumin, Dmitry
    Tobias, Joseph Drew
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 13 : 52 - 58
  • [27] Peer review process
    Center for Research and Technology Development, (Publication) CRTD, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2002, 65 : 11 - 17
  • [28] The Peer Review Process
    Willis, L. Denise
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2024, 69 (04) : 492 - 499
  • [29] Peer review process
    Parrish, Evelyn
    PERSPECTIVES IN PSYCHIATRIC CARE, 2021, 57 (01) : 7 - 8
  • [30] PEER REVIEW PROCESS
    不详
    REVISTA CONTABILIDADE E CONTROLADORIA-RC C, 2022, 14 (03): : 155 - 156