An overview of the peer review process in biomedical sciences

被引:2
|
作者
Miller, Edward [1 ,11 ]
James Weightman, Michael [2 ,3 ]
Basu, Ashna [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Amos, Andrew [7 ]
Brakoulias, Vlasios [8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Div Psychol Med, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Med, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Med & Publ Hlth, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
[4] Prince Wales Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] UNSW, Discipline Psychiat & Mental Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Royal Australian & New Zealand Coll Psychiat, Comm Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] James Cook Univ, Sch Med & Dent, Townsville, Qld, Australia
[8] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[9] Western Sydney Univ, Translat Hlth Res Inst THRI, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[10] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Specialty Psychiat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[11] Univ Auckland, Div Psychol Med, Bldg 507,28 Pk Ave, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
关键词
medical education; peer review; biomedical publishing; psychiatry; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1177/10398562241231460
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective This paper aims to provide an introductory resource for beginner peer reviewers in psychiatry and the broader biomedical science field. It will provide a concise overview of the peer review process, alongside some reviewing tips and tricks.Conclusion The peer review process is a fundamental aspect of biomedical science publishing. The model of peer review offered varies between journals and usually relies on a pool of volunteers with differing levels of expertise and scope. The aim of peer review is to collaboratively leverage reviewers' collective knowledge with the objective of increasing the quality and merit of published works. The limitations, methodology and need for transparency in the peer review process are often poorly understood. Although imperfect, the peer review process provides some degree of scientific rigour by emphasising the need for an ethical, comprehensive and systematic approach to reviewing articles. Contributions from junior reviewers can add significant value to manuscripts.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 251
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Performance Overview Of E-Nose In Biomedical Sciences
    Warakar, Pravin
    Patil, Shashikant
    Kothari, Mayank
    Kurumbanshi, Suresh
    RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 9 (04): : 784 - 791
  • [12] PEER-REVIEW - AN OVERVIEW
    STRICKER, G
    CLAIBORN, WL
    BENT, RJ
    PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 13 (01): : 5 - 8
  • [13] Biomedical journals probe peer review
    Hampton, T
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (18): : 2287 - 2288
  • [14] Shortcomings of peer review in biomedical journals
    Wager, E
    Jefferson, T
    LEARNED PUBLISHING, 2001, 14 (04) : 257 - 263
  • [15] PEER-REVIEW OF THE BIOMEDICAL LITERATURE
    OLSON, CM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1990, 8 (04): : 356 - 358
  • [16] Peer review of biomedical manuscripts: an update
    Ludbrook, J
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 10 (05) : 540 - 542
  • [17] Evaluation of peer review in biomedical publication
    El-Munshid, HA
    ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 2001, 21 (5-6) : 275 - 282
  • [18] Dielectrophoresis for Biomedical Sciences Applications: A Review
    Abd Rahman, Nurhaslina
    Ibrahim, Fatimah
    Yafouz, Bashar
    SENSORS, 2017, 17 (03)
  • [19] Peer review: The biomedical bowling league
    Chai, Toby C.
    Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, 2010, 16 (03): : 145 - 146
  • [20] PEER-REVIEW - THE ARTS AND THE SCIENCES
    FISHER, DW
    HOSPITAL PRACTICE, 1990, 25 (08): : 13 - 13