An overview of the peer review process in biomedical sciences

被引:2
|
作者
Miller, Edward [1 ,11 ]
James Weightman, Michael [2 ,3 ]
Basu, Ashna [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Amos, Andrew [7 ]
Brakoulias, Vlasios [8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Div Psychol Med, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Med, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Flinders Univ S Australia, Coll Med & Publ Hlth, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
[4] Prince Wales Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] UNSW, Discipline Psychiat & Mental Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Royal Australian & New Zealand Coll Psychiat, Comm Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] James Cook Univ, Sch Med & Dent, Townsville, Qld, Australia
[8] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[9] Western Sydney Univ, Translat Hlth Res Inst THRI, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[10] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Specialty Psychiat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[11] Univ Auckland, Div Psychol Med, Bldg 507,28 Pk Ave, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
关键词
medical education; peer review; biomedical publishing; psychiatry; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1177/10398562241231460
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective This paper aims to provide an introductory resource for beginner peer reviewers in psychiatry and the broader biomedical science field. It will provide a concise overview of the peer review process, alongside some reviewing tips and tricks.Conclusion The peer review process is a fundamental aspect of biomedical science publishing. The model of peer review offered varies between journals and usually relies on a pool of volunteers with differing levels of expertise and scope. The aim of peer review is to collaboratively leverage reviewers' collective knowledge with the objective of increasing the quality and merit of published works. The limitations, methodology and need for transparency in the peer review process are often poorly understood. Although imperfect, the peer review process provides some degree of scientific rigour by emphasising the need for an ethical, comprehensive and systematic approach to reviewing articles. Contributions from junior reviewers can add significant value to manuscripts.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 251
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] AN OVERVIEW OF THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS IN BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES
    Miller, E.
    Weightman, M.
    Amos, A.
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 58 : 27 - 28
  • [3] The "peer-review" process in biomedical journals: characteristics of "Elite" reviewers
    Alfonso, F.
    NEUROLOGIA, 2010, 25 (09): : 521 - 529
  • [4] Quality control of the peer-review process by Forensic Sciences Research
    Li, Shiying
    FORENSIC SCIENCES RESEARCH, 2020, 5 (01) : 87 - 88
  • [5] PEER REVIEW IN BIOMEDICAL PUBLICATION
    INGELFINGER, FJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1974, 56 (05): : 686 - 692
  • [6] A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
    Glonti, Ketevan
    Cauchi, Daniel
    Cobo, Erik
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Moher, David
    Hren, Darko
    BMC MEDICINE, 2019, 17 (1)
  • [7] A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
    Ketevan Glonti
    Daniel Cauchi
    Erik Cobo
    Isabelle Boutron
    David Moher
    Darko Hren
    BMC Medicine, 17
  • [8] The Peer Review Congresses Improving Peer Review and Biomedical Publication
    Steinbrook, Robert
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (17): : 1799 - 1800
  • [9] Peer review in health sciences
    Munk-Jorgensen, P
    ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 104 (04) : 319 - 319
  • [10] A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
    Glonti, Ketevan
    Cauchi, Daniel
    Cobo, Erik
    Boutron, Isabelle
    Moher, David
    Hren, Darko
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (10):