Experimental Program on Behavior of Concrete-Filled Steel Deck Composite Diaphragms

被引:0
作者
Avellaneda-Ramirez, R. E. [1 ]
Eatherton, M. R. [2 ]
Easterling, W. S. [3 ]
Schafer, B. W. [4 ]
Hajjar, J. F. [5 ]
机构
[1] Magnusson Klemenc Associates, 1302 Fifth Ave,Suite 3200, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[2] Virginia Tech, 105A Patton Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24060 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Coll Engn, 4100 Marston Hall, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Civil & Syst Engn, 201P Latrobe Hall, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[5] Northeastern Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 400 Snell Engn Ctr, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Concrete-filled steel deck diaphragms; Composite steel deck; Large-scale testing; Seismic behavior; Steel buildings; Diaphragm design;
D O I
10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-12556
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A limited amount of data exists on the cyclic behavior of concrete-filled steel deck diaphragms, and the few historical testing programs that have been conducted used specimens that may not be representative of modern floor assemblies typical in North America. As part of a larger research project, the Steel Diaphragm Innovation Initiative, an experimental program was conducted to fill critical knowledge gaps related to the behavior and design of concrete-filled steel deck diaphragms leading to a better understanding of the seismic performance of steel buildings utilizing these types of diaphragms. The experimental program included eight diaphragm specimens that were approximately 4 m by 5 m, tested in a cantilever test setup wherein one edge is restrained against translation while the opposing edge is subjected to an in-plane cyclic displacement history. Parameters that were varied included deck height (51 mm and 76 mm), concrete cover over the deck (51 mm to 115 mm), concrete type (normal weight and lightweight), configuration of perimeter headed shear studs, and the presence and amount of reinforcing steel. Specimen behavior was quantified including initial stiffness, peak shear strength, ductility, and energy dissipation and qualitatively connected to observed cracking and deformations. The results of this experimental program, combined with tests from the literature were used to develop proposed expressions for peak shear strength and initial stiffness. The proposed expressions reasonably capture the experimental results and are suitable for design.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] ABK (Agbabian Associates S.B. Barnes Associates and Kariotis Associates), 1981, Methodology for mitigation of seismic hazards in existing unreinforced masonry buildings: Diaphragm testing
  • [2] ACI, 318M2019 ACI, DOI DOI 10.14359/51716937
  • [3] AISI, 2020, AISI S310-20
  • [4] AISI (American Iron and Steel Institute), 2017, Test standard for determining the strength and stiffness of cold-formed steel diaphragms by the cantilever test method
  • [5] AISI (American Iron and Steel Institute), 2013, S90713 AISI
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2016, Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2016, SPEC STRUCT STEEL BU
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2016, STANDARD TEST METHOD, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1520/E0384-22, DOI 10.1520/F3001-14R21, 10.1520/C1202-12.2, DOI 10.1520/E0384-17]
  • [9] ASCE, 2010, MIN DELOADBUILD
  • [10] ASTM, 2020, . ASTM A924/A924M