Digital technologies for motor rehabilitation in children: protocol for a cross-sectional European survey

被引:2
|
作者
Pons, Christelle [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Brochard, Sylvain [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Grigoriu, Anca [5 ]
Newman, Christopher J. [6 ]
Monbaliu, Elegast [7 ]
Mensah-Gourmel, Johanne [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gaudin-Drouelle, Delphine [1 ,2 ]
Toumi, Anis
Konings, Marco [7 ]
de la Cruz, Javier [8 ]
机构
[1] INSERM UMR 1101, Lab Med Informat Proc, Brest, France
[2] CHU Brest, Phys Med & Rehabil Dept, Brest, France
[3] Fdn Ildys, Pediat Rehabil Dept, Brest, France
[4] Western Brittany Univ, Med Dept, Brest, France
[5] Natl Ctr Neurorehabil Children Dr N Robanescu, Bucharest, Romania
[6] Univ Hosp Lausanne, Paediat Neurol & Neurorehabil Unit, Lausanne, Switzerland
[7] KU Leuven Bruges, Neurorehabil Technol Lab, Brugge, Belgium
[8] Hosp Univ 12 Octubre, Inst Invest Sanitaria Imas12, Madrid, Spain
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 04期
关键词
REHABILITATION MEDICINE; PAEDIATRICS; Information technology; CEREBRAL-PALSY; VIRTUAL-REALITY; BRAIN-INJURY; THERAPISTS; ACCEPTANCE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069034
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionDigital technologies can be used as part of paediatric motor rehabilitation to remediate impairment, promote recovery and improve function. However, the uptake of digital technologies in this clinical field may be limited.The aim of this study is to describe and explain digital technology use for paediatric motor rehabilitation. The specific objectives will be: (1) to describe the access to, acceptance of and use of digital technologies as a function of individual factors related to professionals practicing motor rehabilitation with children, and of environmental factors related to paediatric rehabilitation practice and (2) to explain digital technology use with a causal model based on the 'unified theory of acceptance and use of technology'.Methods and analysisRehaTech4child (Rehabilitation Technologies For children) is a cross-sectional study involving an online survey, that is sponsored by the European Academy of Childhood Disability (EACD). The survey protocol follows the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and CHERRIES (Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys) guidelines. The survey includes 43 questions about (1) respondents' individual and environmental characteristics; (2) the ease of access to digital technologies, and the frequency, type and purpose of use of those technologies and (3) acceptance of technologies and barriers to their use. The survey is intended for professionals involved in paediatric motor rehabilitation. It is disseminated across Europe by the EACD network in 20 languages. Participation is anonymous and voluntary. We aim to include 500 respondents to ensure sufficient precision for the description of study outcomes and to perform stratified analyses by the main determinants.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval was waived by the Brest CHRU Institutional Review Board. The study is conducted according to current French legislation (loi Jarde' (n degrees 2012-300)) and the survey is GDPR compliant. Study findings will be presented at national and international meetings and submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberNCT05176522.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Warmth, Competence, and the Determinants of Trust in Artificial Intelligence: A Cross-Sectional Survey from China
    Li, Yugang
    Wu, Baizhou
    Huang, Yuqi
    Liu, Jun
    Wu, Junhui
    Luan, Shenghua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2025, 41 (08) : 5024 - 5038
  • [32] Long-term physical and psychological outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-protocol for a national cross-sectional survey of survivors and their relatives (the DANCAS survey)
    Joshi, Vicky L.
    Tang, Lars H.
    Borregaard, Britt
    Zinckernagel, Line
    Mikkelsen, Tina Broby
    Taylor, Rod S.
    Christiansen, Sofie Raahauge
    Nielsen, Jorgen Feldbaek
    Zwisler, Ann Dorthe
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (04):
  • [33] Investigating Italian parents' vaccine hesitancy: A cross-sectional survey
    Napolitano, Francesco
    D'Alessandro, Alessia
    Angelillo, Italo Francesco
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2018, 14 (07) : 1558 - 1565
  • [34] Bruxism, parafunctional oral habits and oral motor problems in children with spastic cerebral palsy: A cross-sectional study
    Tuncer, Aysenur
    Uzun, Asiye
    Tuncer, Abidin H.
    Guzel, Hazel C.
    Atilgan, Elif D.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2023, 50 (12) : 1393 - 1400
  • [35] Smartphone Alcohol Use Disorder Recovery Apps: Cross-sectional Survey of Behavioral Intention to Use
    Menon, Rijuta
    Meyer, Julien
    Nippak, Pria
    Begum, Housne
    JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2022, 9 (02):
  • [36] Clinician Knowledge, Confidence, and Practice Patterns Defining, Identifying, and Quantifying Dystonia in Children: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study
    Barbuto, Amy E.
    Bickley, Christina
    Fiss, Alyssa
    Mitchell, Katy
    DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROREHABILITATION, 2024, 27 (3-4) : 116 - 125
  • [37] Appropriate Image Selection With Virtual Reality in Vestibular Rehabilitation: Cross-sectional Study
    Ersin, Kerem
    Gurlek, Emre
    Guler, Hakan
    Ertugay, Cigdem Kalaycik
    Serbetcioglu, Mustafa Bulent
    JMIR SERIOUS GAMES, 2023, 11
  • [38] Intentions of hospital pharmacists to use digital technology in their daily practice: a cross-sectional survey using the Theory of Planned Behaviour
    Tecen-Yucel, Kamer
    Ozdemir-Ayduran, Nesligul
    Kara, Emre
    Demirkan, Kutay
    Okuyan, Betul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2025,
  • [39] Perceived benefits of digital health and social services among older adults: A population-based cross-sectional survey
    Kainiemi, Emma
    Saukkonen, Petra
    Virtanen, Lotta
    Vehko, Tuulikki
    Kyytsoenen, Maiju
    Aaltonen, Mari
    Heponiemi, Tarja
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 9
  • [40] Cross-sectional comparison of periventricular leukomalacia in preterm and term children
    Lasry, Oliver
    Shevell, Michael I.
    Dagenais, Lynn
    NEUROLOGY, 2010, 74 (17) : 1386 - 1391