Innovation studies, social innovation, and sustainability transitions research: From mutual ignorance towards an integrative perspective?

被引:13
作者
Havas, Attila [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schartinger, Doris [2 ]
Weber, K. Matthias [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Econ & Reg Studies, Inst Econ, Budapest, Hungary
[2] AIT Austrian Inst Technol, Ctr Innovat Syst & Policy, Vienna, Austria
[3] KRTK, Toth Kalman U 4, H-1097 Budapest, Hungary
[4] Univ Gustave Eiffel, LISIS, Champs Sur Marne, France
关键词
Goal-orientated transformative change; An integrative analytical framework; Innovation studies; Social innovation research; Sustainability transitions research; Focussed literature review; MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE; ENERGY INNOVATION; SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGY; DYNAMICS; AGENCY; KNOWLEDGE; INSIGHTS; INTERMEDIARIES; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.eist.2023.100754
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article is a first attempt towards building an integrative analytical framework to study goalorientated transformative change (GOTC) processes, defined as system-transforming processes that are guided by the ambition to resolve current or expected future societal challenges. GOTC can only start once a broad range of possible goals are considered by key stakeholders and major relevant actors are committed to act. Hence, there is a need for widening the scope of the current, partial conceptual models to consider the co-evolutionary interactions between technology, economy, and society to better understand and effectively guide and/or assess GOTC. This claim is based on our focussed review of Innovation Studies, Social Innovation, and Sustainability Transitions research. We offer four building blocks for a new, integrative framework to analyse GOTC: its overarching goal; objects, types, and levels of change; mechanisms of change; and a set of criteria to assess change.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 230 条
[21]  
Beise M, 2001, Lead markets: Country-specific success factors of the global diffusion of innovations
[22]   Universities' contributions to social innovation: reflections in theory & practice [J].
Benneworth, Paul ;
Cunha, Jorge .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 18 (04) :508-+
[23]   'Legitimation' and 'development of positive externalities':: two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems [J].
Bergek, Anna ;
Jacobsson, Staffan ;
Sanden, Bjorn A. .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2008, 20 (05) :575-592
[24]   Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis [J].
Bergek, Anna ;
Jacobsson, Staffan ;
Carlsson, Bo ;
Lindmark, Sven ;
Rickne, Annika .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (03) :407-429
[25]  
Bergek A, 2019, HANDBOOK OF SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION, P200
[26]  
Berkhout F., 2004, System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability, P48, DOI DOI 10.4337/9781845423421.00013
[27]  
Boelman V., 2015, SOCIAL INNOVATION ST
[28]   Competitive advantage through innovation: the case of Nespresso [J].
Brem, Alexander ;
Maier, Maximilian ;
Wimschneider, Christine .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2016, 19 (01) :133-148
[29]  
Bresnahan T, 2012, Recombination, Generality, and Re-Use: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity Revisited
[30]  
Bulakovskiy M, 2021, Building Local Ecosystems for Social Innovation: A Methodological Framework, DOI [10.1787/bef867cd-en, DOI 10.1787/BEF867CD-EN]