Innovation studies, social innovation, and sustainability transitions research: From mutual ignorance towards an integrative perspective?

被引:10
作者
Havas, Attila [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Schartinger, Doris [2 ]
Weber, K. Matthias [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Econ & Reg Studies, Inst Econ, Budapest, Hungary
[2] AIT Austrian Inst Technol, Ctr Innovat Syst & Policy, Vienna, Austria
[3] KRTK, Toth Kalman U 4, H-1097 Budapest, Hungary
[4] Univ Gustave Eiffel, LISIS, Champs Sur Marne, France
关键词
Goal-orientated transformative change; An integrative analytical framework; Innovation studies; Social innovation research; Sustainability transitions research; Focussed literature review; MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE; ENERGY INNOVATION; SYSTEMS; TECHNOLOGY; DYNAMICS; AGENCY; KNOWLEDGE; INSIGHTS; INTERMEDIARIES; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.eist.2023.100754
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article is a first attempt towards building an integrative analytical framework to study goalorientated transformative change (GOTC) processes, defined as system-transforming processes that are guided by the ambition to resolve current or expected future societal challenges. GOTC can only start once a broad range of possible goals are considered by key stakeholders and major relevant actors are committed to act. Hence, there is a need for widening the scope of the current, partial conceptual models to consider the co-evolutionary interactions between technology, economy, and society to better understand and effectively guide and/or assess GOTC. This claim is based on our focussed review of Innovation Studies, Social Innovation, and Sustainability Transitions research. We offer four building blocks for a new, integrative framework to analyse GOTC: its overarching goal; objects, types, and levels of change; mechanisms of change; and a set of criteria to assess change.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 230 条
[1]   Technologically mediated practices in sustainability transitions: Environmental monitoring and the ocean data buoy [J].
Adamo, Greta ;
Willis, Max .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 182
[2]  
Aiginger K., 2013, WWWFOREUROPE WORKING, V44
[3]   Patterns of expectations for emerging sustainable technologies [J].
Alkemade, Floortje ;
Suurs, Roald A. A. .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2012, 79 (03) :448-456
[4]   The innovation and industry dynamics of technology phase-out in sustainability transitions: Insights from diversifying petroleum technology suppliers in Norway [J].
Andersen, Allan Dahl ;
Gulbrandsen, Magnus .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 64
[5]   The role of inter-sectoral dynamics in sustainability transitions: A comment on the transitions research agenda [J].
Andersen, Allan Dahl ;
Steen, Markus ;
Makitie, Tuukka ;
Hanson, Jens ;
Thune, Taran M. ;
Soppe, Birthe .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2020, 34 :348-351
[6]   Multi-technology interaction in socio-technical transitions: How recent dynamics in HVDC technology can inform transition theories [J].
Andersen, Allan Dahl ;
Markard, Jochen .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2020, 151
[8]  
Anderson P.W., 1988, EC EVOLVING COMPLEX
[9]   Innovation as a vehicle for improving socially vulnerable groups' access to basic provisions: A research note on the development of a questionnaire module [J].
Andries, Petra ;
Daou, Alain ;
Verheyden, Laura .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2019, 48 (01) :281-288
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Oslo Manual: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation, The measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities, V4th, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264304604-EN