A systematic literature review of university-industry partnerships in engineering education

被引:4
作者
Shah, R. [1 ]
Gillen, A. L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, Sch Engn & Mat Sci, London, England
[2] Northeastern Univ, First Year Engn Program, 368 Snell Engn, Boston, MA USA
关键词
systematic literature review; university-industry partnerships; engineering education; educational collaboration; undergraduate curriculum; CORPORATE-SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; CAPSTONE DESIGN; GRADUATE-STUDENTS; COMMUNICATION; DEFINITIONS; REFLECTIONS; EXPERIENCES; TECHNOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1080/03043797.2023.2253741
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Over the last few decades, a wide range of works have featured studies documenting successful pedagogic collaborations in the form of university-industry partnerships in engineering education. In light of this, we conducted a systematic literature review of these studies centred around five key research questions: (a) purposes of university-industry collaborations, (b) theories used to guide such work, (c) types of methods employed, (d) evidence-based best practices identified and (e) areas of future work to be explored. Publications were selected for inclusion by screening and appraising results obtained from databases and keywords refined through a scoping study. We conclude from our findings that future studies would benefit from better alignment with literature or theoretical frameworks and specific robust methods. Additionally, early and middle years of undergraduate engineering programs offer underutilised opportunities for partnership, in line with designing a more futures-focused educational curriculum.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 603
页数:27
相关论文
共 135 条
  • [1] Case study: Industry-sponsored mechanical engineering capstone senior design program
    Abu-Mulaweh, Hosni I.
    Abu-Mulaweh, Nusaybah A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2019, 47 (04) : 371 - 381
  • [2] Acharya S., 2017, J ED LEARNING, V6, P69, DOI [10.5539/jel.v6n2p69, DOI 10.5539/JEL.V6N2P69]
  • [3] Alexander D, 2015, INT J ENG EDUC, V31, P1881
  • [4] A structured problem-solving course for graduate students: Exposing students to Six Sigma as part of their university training
    Anderson-Cook, CM
    Patterson, A
    Hoerl, R
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 21 (03) : 249 - 256
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1995, ENG CRIT 2000
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2006, ED ENG 21 CENTURY
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2010, 2010 ANN C EXP P, DOI DOI 10.18260/1-2-16141
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2007, ED ENG 21 CENTURY
  • [9] The Meanings of Student Engagement: Implications for Policies and Practices
    Ashwin, Paul
    McVitty, Debbie
    [J]. EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA: BETWEEN CRITICAL REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE POLICIES, PTS 1-2, 2015, : 343 - 359
  • [10] Bell S., 2010, CLEAR HOUSE J ED STR, V83, P39, DOI [10.1080/00098650903505415, DOI 10.1080/00098650903505415]