Environmental impact of milk and electricity production from dairy farms with biogas plants of different size and feeding system

被引:4
作者
Fusi, Mara [1 ]
Pirlo, Giacomo [1 ]
机构
[1] Council Agr Res & Econ, Res Ctr Anim Prod & Aquaculture, CREA, Via Antonio Lombardo 11, I-26900 Lodi, Italy
关键词
Life cycle assessment; System expansion; Milk; Electricity; Anaerobic digestion; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; CARBON FOOTPRINT; ENERGY CROPS; EFFICIENCY; INTENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135445
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Anaerobic digestion is an effective method to decrease the environmental impact of milk production and to generate renewable energy. A dairy farm with an annexed biogas plant produces three outputs, milk, meat and electricity, and should be considered as a single system for the evaluation of the environmental impact. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent the size and feeding methods of the biogas plants in three dairy farms with different features affect the environmental impact related to the milk and electricity produced. The first farm was characterized by a biogas plant of 300 kW fed only with cattle manure, the second farm had a plant of 526 kW fed with cattle manure, maize silage and waste of maize grain production, while the third farm had a biogas plant of 999 kW fed with cattle and poultry manure, maize and triticale silage, and fats from slaugh-terhouse waste. The Life Cycle Assessment involved the environmental impact of Fat Protein Corrected Milk (FPCM), in the first instance with meat and electricity from biogas considered with an economic allocation, and then considered a credit. Successively, the environmental consequences of electricity were evaluated considering milk and meat as credits. With the economic allocation, Carbon Footprint (CFP) of one kg of FPCM was 0.82, 0.85 and 0.72 kg CO2 eq in the first, second and third farm, respectively. In all the three farms, electricity generation from biogas determined a reduction in the environmental impact of milk production thanks to a credit of emissions provided by the production of renewable energy. Milk CFP in the three farms was 0.82, 0.91 and 0.13 kg CO2 eq respectively, with mitigation from biogas of 11%, 11% and 85%. The best performances were obtained in the third farm thanks to higher levels of electricity generation, covered digestate storage and the large use of agri-industrial waste. Electricity CFP in the farms was-0.74,-0.68 and-0.06 kg CO2 eq/kWh respectively. Environmental consequences of electricity production from biogas plants were compensated in all the farms thanks to the credits provided by milk; this compensation was as greater as the ratio between milk and electricity production and the first farm reached better outcomes. In the context of reducing the environmental impact of animal foods and implementing an ecological transition to reach national and European goals for renewable energy production, the work could be beneficial to assess which combination between dairy and energy products should be promoted.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Woody biofuel production from short rotation coppice in Italy: Environmental-impact assessment of different species and crop management [J].
Bacenetti, Jacopo ;
Bergante, Sara ;
Facciotto, Gianni ;
Fiala, Marco .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2016, 94 :209-219
[32]   Reducing the environmental impact of methane emissions from dairy farms by anaerobic digestion of cattle waste [J].
Maranon, E. ;
Salter, A. M. ;
Castrillon, L. ;
Heaven, S. ;
Fernandez-Nava, Y. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 31 (08) :1745-1751
[33]   Impact of the abolition of the milk quotas system on the productive structure of dairy cattle farms in the Autonomous Community of Andalusia (Spain) [J].
Olvera-Porcel, Rafael ;
Rodriguez-Zamudio, Javier ;
Barba-Capote, Cecilio ;
Olvera-Porcel, M. Carmen ;
Gonzalez-Redondo, Pedro .
ITEA-INFORMACION TECNICA ECONOMICA AGRARIA, 2023, 119 (01) :30-53
[34]   Environmental impact of beef sourced from different production systems - focus on the slaughtering stage: input and output [J].
Mogensen, Lisbeth ;
Nguyen, Thu Lan T. ;
Madsen, Niels T. ;
Pontoppidan, Ole ;
Preda, Teodora ;
Hermansen, John E. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 133 :284-293
[35]   Characteristics of aquaculture sludge produced from two different fish diets and its impact on biogas production [J].
Choudhury, Abhinav ;
Lepine, Christine ;
Hersom, Michaela ;
Good, Christopher .
AQUACULTURAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 111
[36]   Effects of Feeding Management System on Milk Production and Milk Quality from Sheep of the Turcana Breed [J].
Caraba, Ion Valeriu ;
Caraba, Marioara Nicoleta .
ANIMALS, 2023, 13 (18)
[37]   Biogas production from different size fractions separated from solid waste and the accompanying changes in the community structure of methanogenic Archaea [J].
Bernat, Katarzyna ;
Zielinska, Magdalena ;
Cydzik-Kwiatkowska, Agnieszka ;
Wojnowska-Baryla, Irena .
BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2015, 100 :30-40
[38]   Heavy Metal Levels in Milk and Serum of Dairy Cows from Different Farms Located near an Industrial Area [J].
Monteverde, Vincenzo ;
Camilleri, Gaetano ;
Arfuso, Francesca ;
Pennisi, Melissa ;
Perillo, Laura ;
Patito, Gioacchino ;
Gioia, Gianluca ;
Castronovo, Calogero ;
Piccione, Giuseppe .
ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (19)
[39]   Milk production costs of dairy cattle farms; a case study from bafra district of Samsun Province, Turkey [J].
Gozener, Bilge ;
Mollaoglu, Emre .
CUSTOS E AGRONEGOCIO ON LINE, 2021, 17 (01) :166-183
[40]   A new approach using an open-source low cost system for monitoring and controlling biogas production from dairy wastewater [J].
Cruz, Ianny Andrade ;
de Melo, Luciano ;
Leite, Ariadne Nunes ;
Melquiades Satiro, Joao Victor ;
Santos Andrade, Larissa Renata ;
Torres, Nadia Hortense ;
Cabrera Padilla, Rebeca Yndira ;
Bharagava, Ram N. ;
Tavares, Renan Figueiredo ;
Romanholo Ferreira, Luiz Fernando .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 241